# Nature Documentaries and DEATH.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [November 12, 2010, 5:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395 "2010-11-12T05:02:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Max\_Torque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Max\_Torque](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Max_Torque)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/21 "2010-11-12T17:12:07Z")

</div>

They showed it so graphically and dramatically because, let’s face it, crocodiles (and most other animals) don’t do much. A great deal of a crocodile’s life is spent lying, or floating about, motionless.

Crocodiles basically do three things: they eat, they shit, and they make more crocodiles. No one’s interested in watching a crocodile take a shit, so you’re left with eating and making little crocodiles. The rest of the time, watching a crocodile is like watching a log. So, documentaries show the few things the animals actually do, in great detail.

I suppose the real question should be: why are there so many documentaries about crocodiles, when there are so many other animals that are livelier and more interesting? Show us bees or beavers or termites or giant squid or something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/22 "2010-11-12T17:21:38Z")

</div>

Or giant squid that when they open their mouth bees shoot out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AuntiePam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f19dbf/32.png) [@AuntiePam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AuntiePam)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 5:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/23 "2010-11-12T17:49:24Z")

</div>

_Winged Migration_ has a nice balance. The four or five scenes of birds dying or being killed weren’t drawn out and the music wasn’t overplayed. The scenes aren’t easy to watch though (especially the one with the crabs).

But I think I get the OP – why emphasize the gory stuff?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Knorf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/58956e/32.png) [@Knorf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Knorf)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 6:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/24 "2010-11-12T18:03:57Z")

</div>

> [@kapri](#):
>
> I’m with you, Opal. The idea of an innocent creature (which, to me includes all animals) suffering that way is more than I can bear. I know it happens, but I can’t bring myself to watch it, and why should I? I avoid those kinds of nature programs, not because I’m looking at the world through rose-colored glasses but because I see no need to witness suffering voluntarily when I see enough of it in my day-to-day life.

Yeah? What kind of suffering–comparable to being eaten slowly by a large carnivore–do you see in your day-to-day life?

Answer to the OP: because it teaches you something and provides a perspective you otherwise rarely get. Also because it makes for exciting television. You can live in a perfect little imaginary cocoon where all creatures of nature may as well be vegans, but that ain’t the truth by a long shot.

Edit: Also, crying is good for you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Apollo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/41988e/32.png) [@Apollo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Apollo)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/25 "2010-11-12T18:34:23Z")

</div>

Oh come on, haven’t you guys learnt anything from Disney  
It’s **The Circle of Life**

\*_Cue African chant_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dallas\_Jones](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dallas_jones/32/3277_2.png) [@Dallas\_Jones](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dallas_Jones)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 6:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/26 "2010-11-12T18:58:53Z")

</div>

> [@kapri](#):
>
> I’m with you, Opal. The idea of an innocent creature (which, to me includes all animals) suffering that way is more than I can bear. I know it happens, but I can’t bring myself to watch it, and why should I? I avoid those kinds of nature programs, not because I’m looking at the world through rose-colored glasses but because I see no need to witness suffering voluntarily when I see enough of it in my day-to-day life.

You know it happens. Do you realize that violent death is the norm and it _almost always_ happens to wild animals? The young, those only a few years old but past their prime, the slow, those with any injury or disease, all get ripped apart by predators and eaten, usually while they are still partially alive. Sometimes illness or disease or accident will kill them before the predators come, then they go to the scavengers.

There is no elephant graveyard where the wise old ones go to die after a long happy life. There is very little death from old age at all in the natural world.

The sort of Walt Disney world of nature where all animals would live in harmony, with an occational killing for the need of the pack or herd is a fantasy. It usually contains an element about the Evil of Man. This thinking is a religious hold over from the several Garden of Eden type myths. The “innocent creature” must be held in high regard separate from the “sins and evils of Man.”

The reality is if you are a prey animal and you screw up you are breakfast. If you are smart and manage to survive long enough to breed, you still get eaten, but for dinner instead of breakfast.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 7:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/27 "2010-11-12T19:16:41Z")

</div>

> [@DataZak](#):
>
> Snuff films are okay when it’s animal vs animal, I guess.

Snuff films, if they exist, record murders. Non-human animals cannot be murdered, as murder is the killing of a human.

I didn’t see the documentary in session, but I can recall Mrs. Rhymer weeping when we watched a PBS piece about polar bears, which could basically be summarized as “Polar bears are beautiful, majestic creatures and the world will be far poorer when they are extinct, which, incidentally, will happen any decade now. Possibly any year. In fact we wouldn’t be surprised if they were all gone by January but we pray that Athena will be merciful.” And frankly I felt a little like crying myself with the male polar bear killed & ate the cubs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dallas\_Jones](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dallas_jones/32/3277_2.png) [@Dallas\_Jones](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dallas_Jones)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 7:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/28 "2010-11-12T19:32:44Z")

</div>

All wild polar bears drowned last summer due to the _evils of man_, or the Bush administration, or both and are now only found in zoos.

Do try to keep up on current events. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DonLogan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@DonLogan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DonLogan)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 7:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/29 "2010-11-12T19:38:30Z")

</div>

When that happens, five mins later, the other wildebeests are like, “Whatevs…”

You don’t see wildebeests creating insta-shrines every time some goober wildebeest snuffs it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 7:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/30 "2010-11-12T19:52:54Z")

</div>

> [@DonLogan](#):
>
> When that happens, five mins later, the other wildebeests are like, “Whatevs…”
> 
> You don’t see wildebeests creating insta-shrines every time some goober wildebeest snuffs it.

But elephants do. Possibly because evolution favors hanging around a corpse on the offhand chance it isn’t really dead since most predators (i.e. all that I can think of cept for man) are unable to harm a pack of fully grown elephants. But possibly because they are genuinely sad that a herd member has died. Possibly a combination of both.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjimm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba8739/32.png) [@jjimm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jjimm)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/31 "2010-11-12T20:11:27Z")

</div>

> [@Laudenum](#):
>
> That is real life in the wild - nasty, brutal and short.

“Solitary, nasty, brutish and short” was actually coined by Hobbes about pre-civilisation humanity. I think the most appropriate phrase wrt the OP is Tennyson’s “Nature, red in tooth and claw”.

Same difference I know, just being a pedantic twat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slithy\_Tove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slithy_tove/32/18248_2.png) [@Slithy\_Tove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slithy_Tove)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/32 "2010-11-12T20:20:24Z")

</div>

**Meerkat Manor** was a good counter-example. Sure, the little critters kept getting knocked off like it was the Sopranos, but the show gave them names and let their personalites develop, instead of just objects of grim pity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 8:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/33 "2010-11-12T20:42:17Z")

</div>

> [@Slithy\_Tove](#):
>
> **Meerkat Manor** was a good counter-example. Sure, the little critters kept getting knocked off like it was the Sopranos, but the show gave them names and let their personalites develop, instead of just objects of grim pity.

My wife had to stop watching that show, because she would get all interested in the “characters” only to watch them die by the next episode. One meerkat would die and a whole evening was ruined.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OpalCat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/8edcca/32.png) [@OpalCat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OpalCat)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/34 "2010-11-12T21:02:15Z")

</div>

> [@sandra\_nz](#):
>
> Whilst I agree that death is a natural part of life and so should be shown in a documentary about wildlife, it doesn’t need to be made overly melodramatic in the way it is today (with the sad music and slow motion photography). I think that is what the OP is referring to, not that she objects to death being shown at all.

Thank you. This is exactly what I am saying. Yes the entire documentary is zoomed to an extent–nothing is dots on the horizon–but when something dies, they zoom in more, to get every rending tear. Then they slow it down (which I did not notice them doing much for the rest of the documentary, only the deaths) and play it over from as many angles as they can. They make such a show of the brutal killing, rather than just showing it in perspective with the rest of the life of the animals. It’s gruesome and panders to a certain type of sick audience IMO.

As for the comment earlier about domesticated livestock–I’ve been a vegetarian for 24 years and avoid all information about abuse of livestock because I can’t handle it and it makes me depressed for days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OpalCat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/8edcca/32.png) [@OpalCat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OpalCat)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 9:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/35 "2010-11-12T21:06:15Z")

</div>

> [@AuntiePam](#):
>
> _Winged Migration_ has a nice balance. The four or five scenes of birds dying or being killed weren’t drawn out and the music wasn’t overplayed. The scenes aren’t easy to watch though (especially the one with the crabs).
> 
> But I think I get the OP – why emphasize the gory stuff?

Oh, it wasn’t MUSIC that was overplayed. It was the actual audio of the killing. The bleating of the dying calf, the hysterics of the mother who was spazzing out, etc. In slow motion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peremensoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ce7236/32.png) [@Peremensoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peremensoe)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 9:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/36 "2010-11-12T21:11:47Z")

</div>

> [@sandra\_nz](#):
>
> Whilst I agree that death is a natural part of life and so should be shown in a documentary about wildlife, it doesn’t need to be made overly melodramatic in the way it is today (with the sad music and slow motion photography). I think that is what the OP is referring to, not that she objects to death being shown at all.

Let’s make a distinction between drama and melodrama. Drama is good, whether in the depiction of violent death or of less-grim subjects. Melodrama is too much.

> [@OpalCat](#):
>
> Oh, it wasn’t MUSIC that was overplayed. It was the actual audio of the killing. The bleating of the dying calf, the hysterics of the mother who was spazzing out, etc. In slow motion.

How can _actual audio_ be overplayed, if the scene itself is worth having? You’d rather have music or sound effects or silence that wasn’t there?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OpalCat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/8edcca/32.png) [@OpalCat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OpalCat)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 9:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/37 "2010-11-12T21:13:08Z")

</div>

I’d like to reiterate what I said in my OP which the majority of replies seem to have missed: **I GET that they have to show the good AND the bad.** This isn’t my complaint. It’s the WAY they show the bad that gets to me. Slow motion, repeated shots, zoomed way in, etc, all the while playing the sounds of the animal dying… It takes way more time than other single incidents they show. It’s highly disturbing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OpalCat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/8edcca/32.png) [@OpalCat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OpalCat)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/38 "2010-11-12T21:14:22Z")

</div>

> [@spark240](#):
>
> How can _actual audio_ be overplayed, if the scene itself is worth having? You’d rather have music or sound effects or silence that wasn’t there?

Because it’s louder than it would have been from the camera’s distance, it’s slowed down, it’s played over and over…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peremensoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ce7236/32.png) [@Peremensoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peremensoe)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/39 "2010-11-12T21:17:06Z")

</div>

> [@OpalCat](#):
>
> It takes way more time than other single incidents they show.

But is it out of proportion to the actual, real-life drama of the situation? I mean, successful predation is pretty important for the predator, still more so for prey. Starting with the assumption that _actual_ drama is the right thing to emphasize in depicting a true story dramatically, doesn’t it make sense that such moments be expanded?

Think of some dramatic films you’ve seen about humans–don’t the most dramatic moments often have similar expansion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![a35362](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3da27b/32.png) [@a35362](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/a35362)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2010, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395/40 "2010-11-12T21:24:20Z")

</div>

What I want to know is why, when the lionesses are chasing down something with hooves, why am I rooting for the lionesses _every single time?_

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nature-documentaries-and-death/560395.md?page=3)
