# Need a good definition of derivatives

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/need-a-good-definition-of-derivatives/108702>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [May 12, 2002, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/need-a-good-definition-of-derivatives/108702 "2002-05-12T23:08:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2002, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/need-a-good-definition-of-derivatives/108702/21 "2002-05-17T19:11:47Z")

</div>

The chain rule is much simpler, by the way, in Leibnitz notation. There, it’s just dz/dx = (dz/dy) \* (dy/dx) , exactly like you’d guess if those were fractions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qwertyasdfg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/ecc23a/32.png) [@Qwertyasdfg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qwertyasdfg)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 2:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/need-a-good-definition-of-derivatives/108702/22 "2002-07-05T02:09:58Z")

</div>

Ok, I have more questions, which I’ll put here rather than start a new thread:

1. When taking the derivative of a trig function, if the degrees part is a fuction (for example sin (x^2) ) should one differentiate the internal function too? In other words, would that be cos (x^2) or cos (2x) ?

2. Here’s a practice question from the book I’m using. I know the answer (from the book), but I dont understand it. (This isn’t a home work problem; I’m teaching myself calculus to be prepared for some courses I’m taking next school year.)  
V = A sin (wt). A and w are constants. Find dV/dt.  
Here were my thoughts (I got the wrong answer.)

First, make the following statements:  
u = sin (wt)  
z = wt  
According to chain rule (I have no idea what the notation should be, I’ve called derviatives d/dx for now, please correct me on this):  
dV/dt = (d/dx Au)(d/dx sin z)(d/dx wt)  
The derviative of a constant times a variable is the constant times the dervative of the variable, so:  
d/dx Au = A d/dx u  
d/dx wt = w d/dx t  
The derivative of a sine is a cosine so:  
d/dx sin z = cos z.  
So you get: (A)(d/dx u)(cos z)(w)(d/dx t)  
Plugging in for u and z:  
Aw(d/dx sin wt)(cos wt)(d/dx t)  
Which comes out to: Aw cos[sup]2/sup(d/dx t)  
The right answer however, is: wa cos(wt)  
What did I do wrong?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tekgraf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8491ac/32.png) [@tekgraf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tekgraf)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 2:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/need-a-good-definition-of-derivatives/108702/23 "2002-07-05T02:31:50Z")

</div>

Jesus, give it a rest!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![g8rguy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/7cd45c/32.png) [@g8rguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/g8rguy)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 3:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/need-a-good-definition-of-derivatives/108702/24 "2002-07-05T03:27:07Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> 1. When taking the derivative of a trig function, if the degrees part is a fuction (for example sin (x^2) ) should one differentiate the internal function too? In other words, would that be cos (x^2) or cos (2x) ?

Using the chain rule with u=x[sup]2[/sup], we’d have [sup]d sin(u)[/sup]/[sub]dx[/sub] = [sup]d sin(u)[/sup]/[sub]du[/sub]_[sup]du[/sup]/[sub]dx[/sub] = cos(u)_[sup]du[/sup]/[sub]dx[/sub] = cos(u)_2x = 2x_cos(x[sup]2[/sup]). So yes, differentiate the inside part, but that gets pulled out of the trig function. Generally, whenever you see a composite function like this, you’ll have to use the chain rule.

> [@](#):
>
> V = A sin (wt). A and w are constants. Find dV/dt.  
> Here were my thoughts (I got the wrong answer.)
> 
> First, make the following statements:  
> u = sin (wt)  
> z = wt  
> According to chain rule (I have no idea what the notation should be, I’ve called derviatives d/dx for now, please correct me on this):  
> dV/dt = (d/dx Au)(d/dx sin z)(d/dx wt)  
> The derviative of a constant times a variable is the constant times the dervative of the variable, so:  
> d/dx Au = A d/dx u  
> d/dx wt = w d/dx t  
> The derivative of a sine is a cosine so:  
> d/dx sin z = cos z.  
> So you get: (A)(d/dx u)(cos z)(w)(d/dx t)  
> Plugging in for u and z:  
> Aw(d/dx sin wt)(cos wt)(d/dx t)  
> Which comes out to: Aw cos[sup]2/sup(d/dx t)  
> The right answer however, is: wa cos(wt)  
> What did I do wrong?

Basically, you made the entire thing far too complicated and got confused about the chain rule. First of all, note that differentiation with respect to variable p is d/dp; that’s part of your confusion. So let’s call wt=z, like you did. You want, then,  
[sup]d(A_sin(z))[/sup]/[sub]dt[/sub] = A_[sup]d(sin(z))[/sup]/[sub]dz[/sub]\*[sup]dz[/sup]/[sub]dt[/sub]

The derivative of sin(z) is cos(z), the derivative of wt is w, so plugging these back in we get A_cos(z)w = Aw_cos(wt)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ring](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Ring](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ring)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 3:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/need-a-good-definition-of-derivatives/108702/25 "2002-07-05T03:38:20Z")

</div>

V = A sin (wt).

Instead of letting u = sin (wt) let u = wt

So du / dt = w

Now dV / dt = A cos (u) du / dt = A cos (wt) \* w

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/need-a-good-definition-of-derivatives/108702.md?page=1)
