# Negroni to be banned?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [March 11, 2023, 9:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043 "2023-03-11T21:53:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/61 "2023-03-13T18:00:05Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> And I agree that the OP is silly but the side discussion that it triggered is not.

But you still seem to be missing the key point here.

If I have no authority over you, all I can do to try to modify your language choices (or any other aspect of your behavior) is advocate my beliefs and try to persuade you to adopt those beliefs. And if my beliefs are silly (like telling people they shouldn’t drink a Negroni because it’s racially offensive) you, being an intelligent person, will ignore what I’m saying.

Absent authority, you can only get people to change their behavior if you are able to present a reasonable argument about why that change is good. So good ideas can spread through a culture.

But stupid ideas do not. People don’t choose to adopt changes they regard as stupid. So stupid ideas are limited by their own stupidity. People will keep drinking Negronis as long as people think the idea of not drinking Negronis is silly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slicedalone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slicedalone/32/12515_2.png) [@slicedalone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/slicedalone)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/62 "2023-03-13T18:06:23Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> As for the cocktail (which I’ve never heard of before)

It’s quite tasty.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 6:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/63 "2023-03-13T18:07:42Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> Which is what I’m offering. Others are offering theirs. And among those who have offered their views is John McWhorter, a renowned linguist specializing in language change who should not be casually dismissed. As he writes in an article in **[_The Atlantic_](https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/07/brandeis-language-police-have-suggestions-you/619347/)**,

Look, I’m not dismissing McWhorter, because I’m not talking with him: I’m talking with you. Based on the excerpts of him you’re choosing, and the way you’re paraphrasing him, he’s coming across as a disingenuous crank.

Look at this latest pull-quote. He’s not talking about what the governor of a state is demanding all teachers say, or else they get fired. He’s not talking about language that an attorney general has told physicians can get them prosecuted under a new anti-abortion law. He’s talking about a document–_which I can’t find anywhere on [PARC’s website](https://www.brandeis.edu/parc/other-resources.html)_–that he paraphrases as telling people they “must retire” certain words.

I don’t trust his paraphrase. But even if I did, so the fuck what? What power does PARC have? Do they have hiring-and-firing power over anyone? Can they arrest anyone? Can they [spoiler alert] stick your head in a cage full of rats?

What they can do, _at worst_, is make their case. They can try to persuade people that certain language is inaccurate, or unclear, or insensitive, or offensive, or whatever. _And that’s exactly what they should do_.

Criticizing their case on its merits is fine. But you–and, according to you, McWhorter–are going far beyond that. You’re calling it “Orwellian” for them to make the case at all.

And that’s gross.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 6:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/64 "2023-03-13T18:10:35Z")

</div>

And to be clear, I ignore well-meaning advice, too. Last year, someone made the case to me that as a math teacher I should stop using the phrase “story problem”, because certain BIPOC children found the word “problem” to be traumatizing. I listened to their full case, nodded, and promptly ignored the advice–not because it shouldn’t have been given, but because it was ridiculous.

It would have been even more ridiculous for me to call the occasion “Orwellian,” though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/65 "2023-03-13T18:32:53Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Look, I’m not dismissing McWhorter, because I’m not talking with him: I’m talking with you. Based on the excerpts of him you’re choosing, and the way you’re paraphrasing him, he’s coming across as a disingenuous crank.

FWIW, he comes across better in the full article, which does not have nearly the apocalyptic tone **wolfpup** assigns to it. It’s basically just a, “Look at this dumb list,” space-filling article, that doesn’t really make any larger conclusions about the Brandeis list other than, “These people are well meaning but kind of clueless.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 6:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/66 "2023-03-13T18:39:41Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Look, I’m not dismissing McWhorter, because I’m not talking with him: I’m talking with you. Based on the excerpts of him you’re choosing, and the way you’re paraphrasing him, he’s coming across as a disingenuous crank.

You say you’re not dismissing McWhorter, and then proceed to do just that. And I’m not “paraphrasing” him, I’m quoting him. I’ve said before that I don’t always agree with McWhorter. I don’t always agree with Steven Pinker, either, but I’ve never stooped to calling either of them “a disingenuous crank”. And here I think he makes a compelling case.

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> He’s not talking about what the governor of a state is demanding all teachers say, or else they get fired. He’s not talking about language that an attorney general has told physicians can get them prosecuted under a new anti-abortion law.

There are some real horrors going on in America, especially in Florida under DeSantis. But what does that have to do with this conversation? We ought to have the cognitive skills to worry about more than one thing at a time. And the things you cite here are not fundamentally about language change at all, they’re about ugly repressive politics being perpetrated by evil regimes.

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> He’s talking about a document–_which I can’t find anywhere on [PARC’s website](https://www.brandeis.edu/parc/other-resources.html)_–that he paraphrases as telling people they “must retire” certain words.

> **[Brandeis University releases ‘Oppressive Language List’ in effort to promote...](https://whdh.com/news/brandeis-university-releases-oppressive-language-list-in-effort-to-promote-more-inclusive-campus/)**
>
> WALTHAM, MASS. (WHDH) - Brandeis University in Waltham has released an “Oppressive Language List,” as well as recommendations for more neutral language, in an effortRead More

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> What power does PARC have?

Organizations like PARC are _de facto_ authorities who can bring considerable peer pressure to bear, at least within their spheres of influence, even if some people think it’s silly. McWhorter considers it a sufficient problem that he’s been on a mission for some time to call it out when it becomes downright ridiculous, while at the same time strongly supporting worthwhile initiatives like gender-neutral terminology and some of the other examples he cites of positive language change.

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> But you–and, according to you, McWhorter–are going far beyond that. You’re calling it “Orwellian” for them to make the case at all.

If the sole basis of your argument is objection to a particular adjective I used, you don’t have much of an argument. Suppose I withdraw “Orwellian” and substitute, courtesy of McWhorter, the description “an obsessive quest to curate words and expressions by people seeking to change reality through the performative policing of manners”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/67 "2023-03-13T18:49:24Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> Organizations like PARC are _de facto_ authorities who can bring considerable peer pressure to bear, at least within their spheres of influence, even if some people think it’s silly.

No they aren’t. I’m pretty sure no college student ever changed their language choices out of fear of being judged by the kids at PARC.

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> McWhorter considers it a sufficient problem that he’s been on a mission for some time to call it out when it becomes downright ridiculous…

…but don’t call him a crank!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/68 "2023-03-13T18:52:38Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> someone made the case to me that as a math teacher I should stop using the phrase “story problem”, because certain BIPOC children found the word “problem” to be traumatizing

Wait, what…?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steven\_Maven](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steven_maven/32/3272_2.png) [@Steven\_Maven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steven_Maven)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/69 "2023-03-13T18:59:45Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> when “master bedroom” is deprecated as racist when in fact it has a long history of referring to the main bedroom of a house

The point is that “master bedroom” has a SHORT history when compared to racism.  
That term originated in the 1926 Sears catalog, so it has NOTHING to do with slavery.

I’m all for not using terms that demean groups of people. The problem is when someone IMAGINES that a term might offend a group they don’t actually belong to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/70 "2023-03-13T19:00:18Z")

</div>

I could have sworn that the explanation for why the name “monkeypox” was changed was already given, _and that it didn’t have jack shit to do with insulting monkeys_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RitterSport](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rittersport/32/6326_2.png) [@RitterSport](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RitterSport)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/71 "2023-03-13T19:03:04Z")

</div>

> [@Steven\_Maven](#):
>
> The problem is when someone IMAGINES that a term might offend a group they don’t actually belong to.

What is the actual problem with saying “main bedroom” or “primary bedroom”? If you’re a real estate agent and you really don’t want to offend people who may be turned off by “master”, isn’t it good business to use “main”? Or, do you think you’ll turn off all the slave owner wannabes or something?

To the OP, negroni is not going to be banned. But, even if the drink name was changed (because it turned out that negroni is the most terrible thing to say to someone in some language), who cares?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chingon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chingon/32/17645_2.png) [@Chingon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chingon)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/72 "2023-03-13T19:05:34Z")

</div>

Everyone is free to hire real estate agents who use the terms they want. If you want to sell your house and it’s very important to you that it’s called the “master bedroom”, you can specify that demand.

If you’re looking to buy a house, you can tell an agent you only want houses that list “master bedrooms”.

No words have been banned. Continuing to say it has been banned is untruthful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/73 "2023-03-13T19:06:49Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> No they aren’t. I’m pretty sure no college student ever changed their language choices out of fear of being judged by the kids at PARC.

If they don’t have any influence, then everything they’re doing is a waste of time. Influencing change is the whole purpose of PARC’s existence. Read the article I linked about the “oppressive language list”. It sounds like PARC is driving a substantial campus movement. Peer pressure can be a powerful thing.

> [@Miller](#):
>
> …but don’t call him a crank!

Call him whatever you like. But a linguist specializing in language change who has a particular advocacy position on the subject is not what the word “crank” means.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AlsoNamedBort](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alsonamedbort/32/3213_2.png) [@AlsoNamedBort](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AlsoNamedBort)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/74 "2023-03-13T19:10:18Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> Read the article I linked about the “oppressive language list”. It sounds like PARC is driving a substantial campus movement. Peer pressure can be a powerful thing.

From the article:

> The university stressed that the list is meant to be a tool to share information and suggestions and that the use of suggested alternatives is not an expectation or requirement for students and staff.

How draconian.

Also, every news piece I can find is the same one from two years ago. Any follow-up on how the “peer pressure” is working? MY guess is not well since the list doesn’t exist on their website any more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tullsterx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e9bcb4/32.png) [@tullsterx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tullsterx)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/75 "2023-03-13T19:17:32Z")

</div>

I thought Negroni was a Doper. That’s what I thought.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/76 "2023-03-13T19:19:31Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> If they don’t have any influence, then everything they’re doing is a waste of time.

Yeah, probably, but it’s worth noting that you’ve moved the goalposts there, from “de facto authority” to “have any influence at all.”

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> Read the article I linked about the “oppressive language list”. It sounds like PARC is driving a substantial campus movement. Peer pressure can be a powerful thing.

I did read it, and didn’t find anything in it to suggest that PARC represents any sort of “substantial campus movement.”

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> But a linguist specializing in language change who has a particular advocacy position on the subject is not what the word “crank” means.

You say that like these are mutually exclusive terms. One can, of course, be both a specialist in a subject and a crank, even on the same subject.

That said, I wouldn’t call McWhorter a crank based on the article he wrote. I’d call him a crank based off of _your presentation_ of his arguments, but his actual arguments don’t seem to quite match up to what you think they are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/77 "2023-03-13T19:22:14Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> Organizations like PARC are _de facto_ authorities who can bring considerable peer pressure to bear, at least within their spheres of influence,

Oh, this is the Brandies list from two years ago! Yeah, a lot of those were silly. But it’s less silly when you look at the context, which was “here are some issues to think about” (not, “here are some words you should never use, because if you do you are a bad person”) And it’s not close to “Orwellian” to make suggestions and try to make a case for why something might be offensive. That’s, like, the opposite of Orwellian. It’s suggesting that everyone think and make decisions on their own. (which the article that included that list does.)

“The university stressed that the list is meant to be a tool to share information and suggestions and that the use of suggested alternatives is not an expectation or requirement for students and staff.”

It’s not even an expectation ON THE ONE COLLEGE CAMPUS that released the list. It’s hard to imagine a less oppressive way to suggest alternative phrases.

And as for their hidden coercive powers, did I mention that the exhibit I’m looking on my screen at work, RIGHT NOW at still says “ALAE” more than 25 years after my professional organization officially deprecated that term?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/78 "2023-03-13T19:26:34Z")

</div>

In contrast, my dance group changed the title of one of our volunteers from “webmaster” to “web manager” not because anyone forced us to, but because the volunteer requested we change the title.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RitterSport](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rittersport/32/6326_2.png) [@RitterSport](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RitterSport)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/79 "2023-03-13T19:33:00Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> changed the title of one of our volunteers from “webmaster” to “web manager”

Oh, the humanity! 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thorny\_locust](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thorny_locust/32/431_2.png) [@thorny\_locust](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thorny_locust)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043/80 "2023-03-13T19:34:43Z")

</div>

"these sanctions are based on no general agreement among even sensitive, sociologically concerned people. "

How on earth does McWhorter, or you, expect any such agreement to be arrived at except by discussion among people who may well not, at first, agree?

Again, do you think the changes in language, such as gender-neutral terminology, that you do agree with came out of nowhere? They didn’t; they were the result of long and vehement discussions, taking many years to reach any consensus, and were at first considered by most to be the province of isolated cranks who shouldn’t be taken seriously.

> [@Steven\_Maven](#):
>
> The point is that “master bedroom” has a SHORT history when compared to racism.  
> That term originated in the 1926 Sears catalog, so it has NOTHING to do with slavery.

I don’t think the term was intended to do with slavery; but its having originated in 1926 certainly doesn’t disprove it on its own. Legal slavery was over, sure (except in the form of prison sentences); but Jim Crow, the Klan, and both legal and illegal racism were doing fine.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/negroni-to-be-banned/981043.md?page=5)
