What does this thread have to do with Neolithic Homophobia ?
However, award or no, the paper is crap. There is* no evidence at all *that Paleolithic women used hairiness to decide whether to keep or abandon newborns- especially as they had to know that many newborns are born with different hair then lose it very early.
The thesis is on a line with the “Aquatic Ape Theory”. :dubious:
Here’s the article:
See post #13.
In other words, nothing at all. :rolleyes:
Yeah, well, I couldn’t get, “Neolithic Folks May Have Possibly Killed Hairy Babies Because They Thought They Were Animals, At Least According to One Hairbrained Theory That’s Won an Award” to fit in the thread title block. If you were expecting a story which detailed how the original Stonewall riots were merely a continuation of something our neolithic ancestors did, sorry to disappoint you.