# New basic color word in English

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [February 17, 2016, 11:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326 "2016-02-17T11:40:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dtilque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d6d6ee/32.png) [@dtilque](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dtilque)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 11:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/1 "2016-02-17T11:40:05Z")

</div>

English, like many languages, has 11 basic color words. Cecil discusses this in [this column](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/449/could-early-man-only-see-three-colors). A few languages have a 12th basic color word. For instance, Russian and Italian (and maybe Greek) have a basic color word for light blue as distinct from darker blues.

So I’m thinking that English needs a 12th color word as well. Not sure which one though. Maybe lime or turquoise. There’s no good candidates for a light blue, or I’d suggest that. Azure and cerulean just aren’t very common words.

So any ideas or favorites you think should be #12?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 12:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/2 "2016-02-17T12:31:44Z")

</div>

Just to be clear, these are the 11?

1. Black
2. White
3. Red
4. Blue
5. Green
6. Yellow
7. Orange
8. Brown
9. Purple
10. Pink
11. Gray

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 12:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/3 "2016-02-17T12:32:48Z")

</div>

First, get rid of taupe and eggshell.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 12:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/4 "2016-02-17T12:37:28Z")

</div>

Aqua is getting quite a bit of usage as a light blue-green (or green-blue).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjimm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba8739/32.png) [@jjimm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jjimm)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 12:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/5 "2016-02-17T12:52:37Z")

</div>

Italian uses azzurro for light greeny-blue.

Azure was good enough for Shakespeare, and it works for me too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 12:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/6 "2016-02-17T12:58:10Z")

</div>

If a light shade of **Red** is **Pink** , then a light shade of **Blue** could be called **Blink**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 1:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/7 "2016-02-17T13:09:35Z")

</div>

I would have thought that “violet” was a basic colour word in English, especially given its usage in the term “ultra-violet”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 1:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/8 "2016-02-17T13:18:37Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> I would have thought that “violet” was a basic colour word in English, especially given its usage in the term “ultra-violet”.

In the U.S., anyway, “violet” is just a less-popular word for “purple.” My Crayola box always had a “purple (violet)” crayon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WordMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e8c25b/32.png) [@WordMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WordMan)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 1:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/9 "2016-02-17T13:25:41Z")

</div>

ROY G BIV

- Red
- Orange
- Yellow
- Green
- Indigo
- Violet

Don’t these count as “official”?? In which case Indigo and Violet are part of the set.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slow\_Moving\_Vehicle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slow_moving_vehicle/32/291_2.png) [@Slow\_Moving\_Vehicle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slow_Moving_Vehicle)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 1:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/10 "2016-02-17T13:31:32Z")

</div>

> [@Acsenray](#):
>
> In the U.S., anyway, “violet” is just a less-popular word for “purple.” My Crayola box always had a “purple (violet)” crayon.

Really? I’m four decades removed from regular interactions with crayons, but I remember my Crayola boxes having purple _and_ violet. Which I thought odd, even at five, since they were basically the same color. IIRC, and I may not, the violet crayon was slightly more blue than the purple.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 1:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/11 "2016-02-17T13:38:21Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> I would have thought that “violet” was a basic colour word in English, especially given its usage in the term “ultra-violet”.

But we tend to consider violet and purple to be the same. Even if you think violet is more blue and purple more red (as in paints), they’re still variations of the same color.

From what I’ve read, that’s what’s so basic about these colors. It’s the idea that, given a bunch of colors, these are how we’d naturally separate them. The most obvious is pink vs red. We consider light blue to just be a lighter blue, and light green to be a lighter green. But light red is a different color that we call pink.

So I think we can’t just pick a color. We have to pick something we consider to somewhat be a different color than the rest. Not something we sometimes call blue-green or yellow-green or whatever.

I’m torn between **magenta** and **cyan** , as seen in CMYK colors. Cyan would bring us in line with other languages, but I can’t help but think of magenta as a different color than pinkish purple. And at least one person in this thread just sees cyan as **light blue**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 1:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/12 "2016-02-17T13:44:36Z")

</div>

> [@WordMan](#):
>
> ROY G BIV
> 
> - Red
> - Orange
> - Yellow
> - Green
> - Indigo
> - Violet
> 
> Don’t these count as “official”?? In which case Indigo and Violet are part of the set.

There’s nothing “official” about them; in fact, they’re totally arbitrary. When was the last time you saw indigo in a rainbow? Unless by indigo you mean: a cool pale gray.

I’m an artist, and work with color all the time. When you actually look at an array of colors, e.g. a “color wheel,” the biggest gap is between yellow and green. That is, there’s a tremendous contrast between those two, and they beg for an intermediate color. So I nominate yellow-green, or chartreuse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 1:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/13 "2016-02-17T13:57:29Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> I’m an artist, and work with color all the time. When you actually look at an array of colors, e.g. a “color wheel,” the biggest gap is between yellow and green. That is, there’s a tremendous contrast between those two, and they beg for an intermediate color. So I nominate yellow-green, or chartreuse.

I second this proposal, providing we can rename “puce” to be this yellow-green, because puce as a word looks like it should be puke-green.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/14 "2016-02-17T14:06:53Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> There’s nothing “official” about them; in fact, they’re totally arbitrary. When was the last time you saw indigo in a rainbow? Unless by indigo you mean: a cool pale gray.
> 
> I’m an artist, and work with color all the time. When you actually look at an array of colors, e.g. a “color wheel,” the biggest gap is between yellow and green. That is, there’s a tremendous contrast between those two, and they beg for an intermediate color. So I nominate yellow-green, or chartreuse.

As I’ve pointed out before, “Indigo” came in as a color because Isaac Newton was building an analogy between the color “scale” and the mucical scale. His original list of five colors didn’t include Orange or Indigo, but that was before he tried to shoehorn the colors into the same seven-tone scale as notes (counting the lower and upper “do” as the same). Orange was an easy choice between Red and Yellow, but he was harder pressed to name a shade between Blue and Violet. I, personally, don’t see a color in there. “Indigo” is the color of the Indigo plant dye, which is responsible for the blue in blue jeans. (It’s not really a “cool grey”) And that’s what everyone would call it. But Newton needed an extra color in there, so he decided that there was one, and that Indigo was it.

People today don’t really see it. My evidence is that the Resistor Code, which uses the colors of the rainbow (after black and brown for “0” and “1”), goes Red Orange Yellow Green Blue, and Violet.

> **[Electronic color code](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_color_code)**
>
> An electronic color code or electronic colour code (see spelling differences) is used to indicate the values or ratings of electronic components, usually for resistors, but also for capacitors, inductors, diodes and others. A separate code, the 25-pair color code, is used to identify wires in some telecommunications cables. Different codes are used for wire leads on devices such as transformers or in building wiring.
>  
> Before industry standards were established, each manufacturer used its own...

They don’t use Indigo. People don’t really recognize it as a color. If they used it, people would confuse it with blue.

Another place people don’t use it is in the Rainbow Flag. Despite all the talk about the “SEven Colors of the Rainbow”, most rainbow flags have only SIX stripes:

[https://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images;\_ylt=AwrBT8NXfsRWVzkADotXNyoA;\_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?p=Rainbow+Flag&fr=yfp-t-201](https://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images;_ylt=AwrBT8NXfsRWVzkADotXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?p=Rainbow+Flag&fr=yfp-t-201)

In those cases where they feel they need a seventh color, they put in a light blue stripe:

[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e6/Rainbow-flag-1978-nov.svg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e6/Rainbow-flag-1978-nov.svg)

It looks out-of-place, because it doesn’t really look that way in a rainbow. Maybe as Cyan (which people know these days from electronic imaging) is a good choice for the extra color.

“Purple”, by the way, in optics is the color on the line connecting Red and Blue on a CIE color diagram. It’s the Purple Line. Colors between the center of the Purple Line and the White Point are Magenta.

> **[Line of purples](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_of_purples)**
>
> In color theory, the line of purples or purple boundary is the locus on the edge of the chromaticity diagram formed between extreme spectral red and violet. Except for these endpoints of the line, colors on the line are non-spectral (no monochromatic light source can generate them). Rather, every color on the line is a unique mixture in a ratio of fully saturated red and fully saturated violet, the two spectral color endpoints of visibility on the spectrum of pure hues. Colors on the line and spe...

> **[Magenta](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magenta)**
>
> Magenta (/məˈdʒɛntə/) is a purplish-red color. On color wheels of the RGB (additive) and CMY (subtractive) color models, it is located precisely midway between blue and red. It is one of the four colors of ink used in color printing by an inkjet printer, along with yellow, cyan, and black to make all the other colors. The tone of magenta used in printing, printer's magenta, is redder than the magenta of the RGB (additive) model, the former being closer to rose.
> Magenta took its name from an anil...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mijin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mijin/32/9369_2.png) [@Mijin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mijin)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/15 "2016-02-17T14:10:31Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> I’m torn between **magenta** and **cyan** , as seen in CMYK colors. Cyan would bring us in line with other languages, but I can’t help but think of magenta as a different color than pinkish purple. And at least one person in this thread just sees cyan as **light blue**.

Was going to say, as a programmer, cyan really feels like a basic color to me.  
It doesn’t cover much range though…I’ve only ever seen it depicted with strong saturation so can’t fathom a pastel cyan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Don\_t\_Panic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/don_t_panic/32/398_2.png) [@Don\_t\_Panic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Don_t_Panic)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/16 "2016-02-17T14:28:12Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> There’s nothing “official” about them; in fact, they’re totally arbitrary. When was the last time you saw indigo in a rainbow?

As I’ve mentioned before, the whole stupid indigo debacle seems to be about a labeling issue with Newton’s spectrum. I usually see it reproduced like [this](http://www.recessart.org/wp-content/uploads/wheelw.jpg), with his “indigo” looking blue, and his “blue” more like cyan.

I wish he’d just labeled them “cyan” and “blue” instead of “blue” and “indigo”. Maybe the conventions for color naming were different at the time.

A [rainbow](http://blogs.nature.com/spoonful/files/Rainbow.jpg), for reference (in case someone doesn’t know what one looks like).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 2:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/17 "2016-02-17T14:32:40Z")

</div>

> [@Martian Bigfoot](#):
>
> As I’ve mentioned before, the whole stupid indigo debacle seems to be about a labeling issue with Newton’s spectrum. I usually see it reproduced like [this](http://www.recessart.org/wp-content/uploads/wheelw.jpg), with his “indigo” looking blue, and his “blue” more like cyan.
> 
> I wish he’d just labeled them “cyan” and “blue” instead of “blue” and “indigo”. Maybe the conventions for color naming were different at the time.
> 
> A [rainbow](http://blogs.nature.com/spoonful/files/Rainbow.jpg), for reference (in case someone doesn’t know what one looks like).

They were indeed. But if he’d called them “cyan” and “Blue” we’d now be complaining that we had two color names for indistinguishable colors, because HIS “cyan” wouldn’t be what we now call “Cyan”, but what we now call “indigo”, which looks like “blue” to me and most other folks.

just _calling_ it “cyan” wouldn’t have made it a clearly different light blue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Don\_t\_Panic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/don_t_panic/32/398_2.png) [@Don\_t\_Panic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Don_t_Panic)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 2:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/18 "2016-02-17T14:39:22Z")

</div>

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> They were indeed. But if he’d called them “cyan” and “Blue” we’d now be complaining that we had two color names for indistinguishable colors, because HIS “cyan” wouldn’t be what we now call “Cyan”, but what we now call “indigo”, which looks like “blue” to me and most other folks.
> 
> just _calling_ it “cyan” wouldn’t have made it a clearly different light blue.

I don’t see what you mean. If you look at the spectrum, there’s a noticable band of what is clearly cyan.

Maybe my link wasn’t that great. [Another take.](http://i.stack.imgur.com/2owrM.png) If you see what I’m getting at.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 3:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/19 "2016-02-17T15:22:45Z")

</div>

> [@Martian Bigfoot](#):
>
> I don’t see what you mean. If you look at the spectrum, there’s a noticable band of what is clearly cyan.
> 
> Maybe my link wasn’t that great. [Another take.](http://i.stack.imgur.com/2owrM.png) If you see what I’m getting at.

That Cyan is between Blue and Green. Indigo is between Blue and Violet. Calling what is now called “Indigo” by the name “Cyan” would leave us with a still-indistinguishable-from-blue color, only now it would be called “cyan”.

Newton didn’t think his extra color belonged between blue and green. He was building his case on the ratios of what we would call wavelengths (only Newton didn’t believe in the wave theory\*) of light and those of the do-re-me musical scale. “ti” worked perfectly as violet and “sol” as blue. He needed a color for his “la”. What we call “cyan” would have to fit between Green = “fa” and Blue = “sol”, and he didn’t need a color there, as there was no gap.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326/20 "2016-02-17T15:38:08Z")

</div>

To perhaps clarify what’s being discussed here: English (like all modern languages) does of course have many, many color words. You can find a box of crayons or a can of paint containing such colors as “periwinkle”, and “robin’s egg” and “cerulean”. But most English-speakers would look at all of those colors and say “Yeah, they’re all different, but they’re all shades of blue”. By contrast, an English speaker would not look at green and call it a shade of blue: “Green” and “blue” are different colors in a more fundamental way than “periwinkle” and “cerulean” are.

But this distinction is a cultural one: Some other cultures might look at the grass and at the sky and, while agreeing that they were different colors, say that they were just two different shades of the same “basic color”. Or, alternately, they might consider cerulean and blue to be two different colors, not just shades of something.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-basic-color-word-in-english/746326.md?page=2)
