# New Hampshire Bragging Rights Thread

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [February 2, 2016, 3:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914 "2016-02-02T03:10:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 15\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2016, 3:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/41 "2016-02-08T03:33:51Z")

</div>

Rubio’s NH momentum had stalled even before the debate. If anything, the establishment seems to be coalescing around Kasich, although not enough to give him a convincing showing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kolak_of_twilo/32/73_2.png) [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolak_of_Twilo)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2016, 5:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/42 "2016-02-08T05:19:44Z")

</div>

> [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](#):
>
> Rubio 24%  
> Trump 23%  
> Kasich 19%  
> Cruz 10%  
> For the Dems I’m going out on a limb and saying:  
> Sanders 51%  
> Clinton 45%

So I’m willing to stand by my projection for the D’s but after that debacle of a debate last night I would modify the GOP side thusly:  
Trump 28%  
Kasich 22%  
Christie 12%  
Bush 10%  
Cruz 9%

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/do_not_taunt/32/2968_2.png) [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Do_Not_Taunt)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2016, 5:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/43 "2016-02-08T05:52:23Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> If anything, the establishment seems to be coalescing around Kasich, although not enough to give him a convincing showing.

Uh, yeah. Not going to even consider that one without a credible cite.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Onomatopoeia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/onomatopoeia/32/4145_2.png) [@Onomatopoeia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Onomatopoeia)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2016, 6:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/44 "2016-02-08T06:00:30Z")

</div>

> [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](#):
>
> So I’m willing to stand by my projection for the D’s but after that debacle of a debate last night I would modify the GOP side thusly:  
> Trump 28%  
> Kasich 22%  
> Christie 12%  
> Bush 10%  
> Cruz 9%

So you’re thinking almost all of Rubio’s votes will go to others? Wow, even I don’t believe he will drop so precipitously.

ETA: My guess is Rubio stays somewhere in third place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlackerInc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slackerinc/32/275_2.png) [@SlackerInc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlackerInc)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2016, 8:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/45 "2016-02-08T08:43:49Z")

</div>

I too have done this without consulting any polls (I would have done except that the debate scrambled things a lot, I suspect):

Trump 30.0  
Kasich 18.4  
Bush 10.5  
Rubio 9.8  
Cruz 8.3  
Christie 6.6  
Fiorina 4.1  
Carson 2.7  
Pataki 2.3  
Paul 1.1  
Other 6.2

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2016, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/46 "2016-02-09T18:24:05Z")

</div>

TRUMP-35%  
KKKa$ich-17%  
Jeb!-14%  
**Rubio** -12%  
Cruz-11%  
Christie-9%  
Carson-1%  
Fiorina-1%

Dems:  
Sanders-55%  
Clinton-45%

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2016, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/47 "2016-02-09T18:52:28Z")

</div>

Slight revision to above:

Trump 35%  
Kasich 15%  
Cruz 12%  
Christie 12%  
Rubio 10%  
Rubio 10%  
Rubio 10%  
Rubio 10%  
Bush 6%  
Carson 5%

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2016, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/48 "2016-02-10T02:38:08Z")

</div>

Ha!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/do_not_taunt/32/2968_2.png) [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Do_Not_Taunt)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2016, 6:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/49 "2016-02-10T06:58:39Z")

</div>

> [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](#):
>
> I’m going to go against the grain and say the Rubio bounce doesn’t materialize. (ETA: I will openly admit that this is adanalysis here. I’d certain prefer for Rubio’s momentum to stall.)
> 
> Trump: 28  
> Cruz: 18  
> Kasich: 12
> 
> Is Gilmore even in it? Do already-dropped candidates count for last? I predict Santorum will beat Huck.

Alright, I’m giving myself a B this time. Predicting the Rubio non-bounce - _before_ his disastrous debate - was a stroke of genius. I picked the top three correct, just not in the right order. I really thought Cruz would do better, in terms of picking up the far-right vote that is there in NH and turning them out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlackerInc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slackerinc/32/275_2.png) [@SlackerInc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlackerInc)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2016, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/50 "2016-02-10T14:13:08Z")

</div>

> [@SlackerInc](#):
>
> I too have done this without consulting any polls (I would have done except that the debate scrambled things a lot, I suspect):
> 
> Trump 30.0  
> Kasich 18.4  
> Bush 10.5  
> Rubio 9.8  
> Cruz 8.3  
> Christie 6.6  
> Fiorina 4.1  
> Carson 2.7

Had Rubio gotten 6/10ths of a point of Cruz’s support, I would have gotten the top eight in the exact right order. Giving myself an A-.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/do_not_taunt/32/2968_2.png) [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Do_Not_Taunt)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2016, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/51 "2016-02-10T17:34:29Z")

</div>

> [@SlackerInc](#):
>
> > [@](#):
> >
> > Trump 30.0  
> > Kasich 18.4  
> > Bush 10.5  
> > Rubio 9.8  
> > Cruz 8.3  
> > Christie 6.6  
> > Fiorina 4.1  
> > Carson 2.7
> 
> Had Rubio gotten 6/10ths of a point of Cruz’s support, I would have gotten the top eight in the exact right order. Giving myself an A-.

It might be a slow morning for me, but it looks like if you give Rubio 0.6 points from Cruz, you’d have Trump, Kasich, Rubio, Bush, Cruz, which is not the correct order.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlackerInc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slackerinc/32/275_2.png) [@SlackerInc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlackerInc)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2016, 6:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/52 "2016-02-10T18:04:02Z")

</div>

> [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](#):
>
> It might be a slow morning for me, but it looks like if you give Rubio 0.6 points from Cruz, you’d have Trump, Kasich, Rubio, Bush, Cruz, which is not the correct order.

I see the numbers are slightly different from when I posted that. Here is what looks to be the final tally:

Trump 35.3  
Kasich 15.8  
Cruz 11.7  
Bush 11.0  
Rubio 10.5  
Christie 7.4  
Fiorina 4.1  
Carson 2.3

So, yeah, now if I take 0.6 from Cruz and give it to Rubio, it becomes (slightly different from what you said):

Trump 35.3  
Kasich 15.8  
Rubio 11.1  
Cruz 11.1  
Bush 11.0  
Christie 7.4  
Fiorina 4.1  
Carson 2.3

So I would have to change it based on these final numbers to “If I took 0.8 from Cruz and gave 0.6 of it to Rubio and 0.2 to Bush, I would have the top eight in the right order.” More complicated, not as impressive, alas; but still indicative of being very close.

Also, here were my numbers compared to the actual (mine/actual):

Trump 30.0/35.3  
Kasich 18.4/15.8  
Cruz 8.3/11.7  
Bush 10.5/11.0  
Rubio 9.8/10.5  
Christie 6.6/7.4  
Fiorina 4.1/4.1  
Carson 2.7/2.3

I called Kasich’s second place finish, and that it would be by a comfortable margin over Bush/Rubio/Cruz, all three of whom would be tightly bunched. My biggest miss was Cruz, but for the bottom five (Bush, Rubio, Christie, Fiorina, and Carson) I averaged less than a half percentage point off of their actual numbers. I’m sticking to my A-, dammit! 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YogSothoth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/8edcca/32.png) [@YogSothoth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/YogSothoth)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2016, 6:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/53 "2016-02-10T18:11:27Z")

</div>

WTF, Bush is still relevant? Along with Kasich being 2nd and Rubio dropping to 5th, this has been a most unpredictable NH

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kolak_of_twilo/32/73_2.png) [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolak_of_Twilo)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2016, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/54 "2016-02-10T18:29:20Z")

</div>

> [@Onomatopoeia](#):
>
> > [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](#):
> >
> > So I’m willing to stand by my projection for the D’s but after that debacle of a debate last night I would modify the GOP side thusly:  
> > Trump 28%  
> > Kasich 22%  
> > Christie 12%  
> > Bush 10%  
> > Cruz 9%
> 
> So you’re thinking almost all of Rubio’s votes will go to others? Wow, even I don’t believe he will drop so precipitously.
> 
> ETA: My guess is Rubio stays somewhere in third place.

Well, Trump did much better than I thought with 35.4% but at least I had Kasich in second though he didn’t do as well as I expected.  
The only ones I got close on were Cruz and Bush. Even Rubio didn’t fall as far as I [del]hoped[/del] thought he would.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/do_not_taunt/32/2968_2.png) [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Do_Not_Taunt)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2016, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914/55 "2016-02-10T19:50:20Z")

</div>

> [@SlackerInc](#):
>
> So, yeah, now if I take 0.6 from Cruz and give it to Rubio, it becomes (slightly different from what you said):

Yeah, guess the exact numbers are still in flux a bit…

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/new-hampshire-bragging-rights-thread/744914.md?page=2)
