IMO, service awards started taking a nose dive when the Navy started awarding a Sea Service Ribbon. Really? An award for going to sea: in the Navy? I guess it was so Ensigns could have something on their chests besides nipples.
If this were ever true then it hasn’t been true in a long time. Good Conduct medals are awarded for doing your job and not F-ing up. And, I got the NDSM simply for serving during war time. I just did my job and didn’t do anything above and beyond except for just showing up. (Which, BTW, some didn’t and they went UA, claiming CO status)
Yeah, if we can give out medals for perfect attendance (which we have been since at least Vietnam), then we can give out medals for skillful use of technology. I’m not saying that it should be considered a higher award than the Bronze Star, but I have no problem at all with its mere existence.
FWIW, a USN captain is the equivalent of a US Army bird colonel (one rank below a brigadier general/rear admiral, lower half). An Army captain is the equivalent of a USN lieutenant (two silver bars).
It’s seems pretty obvious which posters are veterans and which aren’t.
For the record, I’m a 20 yr Air Force veteran with over 5,000 hours of flight duty - master enlisted aircrew (electronics tech.). My deployments included the combat theaters of the Liberation of Grenada and Desert Storm. I am qualified to speak knowledgeably on this.
I vehemently object to this accommodation being an actual medal (rather than an accommodation ribbon) and being given precedence above the Bronze Star and Purple Heart.
I support recognizing and rewarding extraordinary service, but the recognition given should be appropriate of the service and not insult recipients of other medals.
I will log into my veteran boards and add my voice to any efforts against this.
Every job I’ve ever done had workers that were better at their jobs than others. It’s the supervisor/managers job to recognize it and reward it accordingly.
Saying that recognizing someone else’s accomplishments is an insult to other medal recipients is like saying that letting gays marry is harmful to straight couples.
Not really because there is a strict hierarchy with regards to medals. Giving medals for people who sit in front of a screen that are ranked higher than those given to people who actually put their lives in danger is insulting. When my buddy was killed in Afghanistan he got a Bronze Star. Why should a drone pilot get a medal higher than his?
Drone pilot: Oh shit! My drone just got shot down! Man, I almost spilled my coffee. I’m having the worse day ever. I can’t wait to tell my wife tonight.
An Army/Air Force/Marine captain equals a Navy/Coast Guard lieutenant. A Navy/Coast Guard captain equals an Army/Air Force/Marine colonel, it’s the highest rank before flag lever (generals & admirals).
I agree that medals and such are probably best kept as the equivalent of laurels to motivate people to perform extraordinary action for the good of the group and to inspire such an ethos in others. If a lot of people get them, they lose much of their impact.
About being mocked: Why do you suppose that is? Is it just good-natured taking the piss or not? I can see why they’d be mocked in much the same way that medieval knights must have sought to belittle crossbowmen and arquebusiers. How dare they do their job in a more effective, cheaper and safer way!
I suppose the Nintendogs of war might respond simply by playing the Buggles’ Video killed the radio star and Daft Punk’s Harder Better Faster Stronger.
Have any bomber crews earned medals for sorties over Afghanistan in the last ten years? Seems to me that if you’re in a B-52, B-1, or B-2, you’re not exactly being threatened by enemy air defenses, but I suppose they could do things that end up saving troops lives due to their expertise with their weapons and quick thinking. Should bomber crews be eligible for medals on the same basis as infantry?
I don’t know whether any have or not, but it is still better than drone pilots, as the odds of getting shot down are slim, yes, but their aircraft can still malfunction in flight, they can crash on landing, etc etc. Any flight in the military is inherently dangerous.
I’m not so sure why these guys are so butt-hurt about this; it’s not like the Bronze Star is necessarily a heroism-related medal.
It’s entirely possible to be awarded one for meritorious service, and not even see any combat. If this happens, it doesn’t come with the “V” for valor clasp, but it’s still a Bronze Star.
As a matter of fact, it was devised as the ground soldier equivalent of the Air Medal, not as some sort of heroism award, and in 1947, it was retroactively awarded to anyone who was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge or Combat Medical Badge, without the V device.
The Distinguished Flying Cross, which is one step below the Legion of Merit, and 3 above the Bronze Star is much the same way- it’s not necessarily heroism; in 1942-1945, if you survived so many sorties, you got the Air Medal, and so many more, and you go the DFC; for a bomber crewman to complete 25 missions, that was an automatic DFC and an Air Medal with 5 oak leaf clusters.