# News Sites

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [March 19, 2017, 11:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537 "2017-03-19T11:35:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anomalous1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e56c9b/32.png) [@anomalous1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/anomalous1)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2017, 11:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537/1 "2017-03-19T11:35:36Z")

</div>

Just to be clear, not asking for an opinion on them. Just options. I really need a news website that has a simple, clean interface. Obviously, non-biased/slanted is the larger of the preference here, besides varied content. Anyone know of any? I can’t use the big players for obvious reasons. Slashdot was decent, now not so much. I need a new homepage to recap on what is going on in the U.S. and the World… any tips are really appreciated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elbows](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/b3f665/32.png) [@elbows](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elbows)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2017, 11:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537/2 "2017-03-19T11:41:00Z")

</div>

Have a look at Channel News Asia. You might find it a nice change. ‘Non bias/slanted’, seems an unrealistic aim, but ‘less bias’, seems doable!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bob\_2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bob_2/32/3341_2.png) [@bob\_2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bob_2)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2017, 12:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537/3 "2017-03-19T12:17:13Z")

</div>

I use the BBC website.

> **[Home - BBC News](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news)**
>
> Visit BBC News for up-to-the-minute news, breaking news, video, audio and feature stories. BBC News provides trusted World and UK news as well as local and regional perspectives. Also entertainment, business, science, technology and health news.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![igor\_frankensteen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/839c29/32.png) [@igor\_frankensteen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/igor_frankensteen)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2017, 4:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537/4 "2017-03-19T16:09:20Z")

</div>

You might like to use Newsprism as a launchpoint. It isn’t a news site itself, it’s an organized set of links to news sites, arranged as a spectrum from left to right, liberal to conservative.

I like to get a taste of each side’s version/assumptions about the hot story of the day, and I can do that using this starting point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2017, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537/5 "2017-03-19T16:16:59Z")

</div>

Since the OP is looking for advice, let’s move this to IMHO.

Colibri  
General Questions Moderator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![whitetho](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whitetho/32/1059_2.png) [@whitetho](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/whitetho)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2017, 11:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537/6 "2017-03-19T23:07:47Z")

</div>

I’ve been happy with [news.google.com](http://news.google.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2017, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537/7 "2017-03-20T01:15:08Z")

</div>

> [@anomalous1](#):
>
> I can’t use the big players for obvious reasons.

It’s not all obvious to me what you consider to be the “big players” or why you can’t use them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stinky\_Pete](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bc79bd/32.png) [@Stinky\_Pete](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stinky_Pete)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2017, 3:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537/8 "2017-03-20T03:18:53Z")

</div>

I like [debka.com](http://debka.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gary\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Gary\_T](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gary_T)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2017, 1:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/news-sites/782537/9 "2017-03-21T01:07:40Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> It’s not all obvious to me what you consider to be the “big players” or why you can’t use them.

Same here. Strikes me as rather odd and actually rather non-obvious.
