Next in series 1,4,2,8,2,16,...

The fact that the question is asking for the next three numbers is probably the key to problem. So yeh, I’m thinking one 1, two 2s, three 3s…

Time for a hijack!!!

Next in series:

20, 1, 18, 4, 13, …

20,1,18,4,13,9,3,16,-14,25,-40,36?

Nope, try again.

(If you know the next few digits, please list them. But don’t reveal how you got the answer. :slight_smile: )

Now I will go nutz trying to figure it out.

Please explain! I played sax in high school band but can’t figure what you’re alluding to here.

…10, 6, 18?

I’m pretty sure it goes: 1, 4, 2, 8, 2, 16, 14 k of g in a f p d, …

Here’s one of my favourites:

0, 1, 2, …

The next number is …

approximately 2.6 times 10^1746 – the series is the natural numbers starting with 0, each followed by n factorial signs:
0, 1!, 2!!, 3!!!, etc.
It gets large very fast …

2,4,288

Nope.

The first impression I got was that the second number in the series is the product of
(Sum of all the odd-sequenced integers)(4) while the odd numbered integers are a Fibonacci sequence. But a Fibonacci sequence has to begin 1, 1. If instead the odd numbered integers are calculated by having them appear in the same number they represent, then it goes

1
4
2
8 (1)(2)(4)
2
16 (1)(2)(2)(4)
3
48 (1)(2)(2)(3)(4)
3
142 (1)(2)(2)(3)(3)(4)
3
426 (1)(2)(2)(3)(3)(3)(4)
4
1704 (all that stuff times 4)
… and so on.

I don’t think there is any one correct answer, but does there have to be? Maybe the teacher’s just asking the students to play around and see what they get.

I hope the teacher will accept multiple answers if the student can show how (s)he got it.

Once I had a test with the question 4 is to 6 as 6 is to?

The correct answer was 8, but a significant number of us answered 9. When we explained how we got it the teacher accepted 8 or 9 as correct.

As soon as I see 1,4 I want to go to 9,16,25,36
As soon as I see 1,3 I want to go to 7,11,13,17

I hate these kind of questions. I think the next six numbers should be .357, .357, .357, .357, .357, .357!

:smack: Eighteen numbers.

Eighteen.

I was suspicious this wasn’t a self-contained sequence. :dubious: Now I don’t feel so bad.

1, 4, 2, 8, 2, 16, 219, 1002, 3063, …

Seems pretty cut-and-dried.

6, 10, 15, …

here I haven’t played in years, yet saw it immediately.

Clever, but these sorts of number sequence problems need to be self-contained (i.e. not dependent on context from anything else), but rather the next number derived from the numbers preceding it.

Here’s a favourite of mine:

3,1,0,1,4,3,…

Just carry the sequence on. As a little hint, it has a finite number of terms.