# Nice move by Tammy Duckworth - gives up 8.4% of her salary

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [March 4, 2013, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006 "2013-03-04T16:27:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigAppleBucky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigapplebucky/32/178_2.png) [@BigAppleBucky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigAppleBucky)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/1 "2013-03-04T16:27:07Z")

</div>

> **[Democratic Rep Praises Boehner On VAWA, Criticizes Sequestration](https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tammy-duckworth-vawa_n_2792848)**
>
> Democratic Rep Praises Boehner On VAWA, Criticizes Sequestration

> [@](#):
>
> Earlier in the week Duckworth announced her own unique way of drawing attention to the issue: taking a voluntary 8.4 percent pay cut by returning a portion of her monthly salary to the U.S. Treasury, until a balanced solution is reached.
> 
> The congresswoman said she reached the decision after visiting school superintendents in her district last weekend and listening to how the spending cuts would impact special needs and Head Start programs. The 8.4 percentage pay cut is calculated to match the reduction that most discretionary programs will face if sequestration remains intact through the remainder of the fiscal year.
> 
> “If Congress is not going to do its job in coming to an agreement, and my neighbors here are going to hurt,” Duckworth said, “then I should hurt too.”

Will other Congresscritters follow?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/2 "2013-03-04T17:55:38Z")

</div>

Let’s hope so.  
A classy move on her part.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/3 "2013-03-04T18:48:34Z")

</div>

Eh, I’d rather they do something substantial and solve the actual problem rather then dicking around with meaningless symbolic gestures. The Head Start program’s troubles have nothing to do with Tammy Duckworth’s salary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oakminster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/77aa72/32.png) [@Oakminster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Oakminster)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 7:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/4 "2013-03-04T19:08:06Z")

</div>

Political grandstanding. A congresscritter is not going to miss 8.4 % of her salary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/5 "2013-03-04T19:54:29Z")

</div>

> [@Oakminster](#):
>
> Political grandstanding. A congresscritter is not going to miss 8.4 % of her salary.

Eh, to be fair, I don’t think the Duckworths are particularly loaded. She makes 170k and IIRC, her husband is an army officer and presumably makes less then that. They’re hardly going to be reduced to begging on the streets, but I imagine ~$15,000 is a non-trivial sacrifice on their part.

My problem is that trivial or not, its a meaningless sacrifice. The problems of gov’t dysfunction that created the Sequester don’t have anything to do with Congressional salaries. Giving up part of her salary isn’t going to make life any easier for people hurt by the Sequester, or do anything to help resolve it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_the\_Turtle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_the_turtle/32/2926_2.png) [@Fear\_the\_Turtle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_the_Turtle)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 8:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/6 "2013-03-04T20:01:25Z")

</div>

Why didn’t she take a 20% cut like other federal workers?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 8:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/7 "2013-03-04T20:03:27Z")

</div>

> [@Fear\_the\_Turtle](#):
>
> Why didn’t she take a 20% cut like other federal workers?

Congress is Constitutionally barred from cutting (or raising) its own salary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/8 "2013-03-04T20:12:02Z")

</div>

> [@Simplicio](#):
>
> Congress is Constitutionally barred from cutting (or raising) its own salary.

They can do it for the next congress, right?

I’m thinking any future sequestration deal needs to include a massive cut to Congress’s salary and budgets. We obviously can’t go for Colbert’s solution, of threatening to open the cage of an ebola monkey in chambers, but we should look for something that makes them take it seriously.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/9 "2013-03-04T20:22:31Z")

</div>

It’s a nice gesture by Duckworth and I won’t complain about her making it, but let’s not pretend it’s any more than it is. We need these crises to end more than we need gestures.

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> I’m thinking any future sequestration deal needs to include a massive cut to Congress’s salary and budgets.

There needs to never be a sequestration bill again. It was a bad idea that completely failed at every stage, and Congress did not respond to the threat it posed. The only good thing you can say about it is that things are so bad that at the time it didn’t seem worse than anything else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/10 "2013-03-04T20:30:59Z")

</div>

> [@carnivorousplant](#):
>
> Let’s hope so.  
> A classy move on her part.

Aye, this is one seriously classy, civic-minded lady.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/11 "2013-03-04T20:34:10Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> There needs to never be a sequestration bill again. It was a bad idea that completely failed at every stage, and Congress did not respond to the threat it posed. The only good thing you can say about it is that things are so bad that at the time it didn’t seem worse than anything else.

Indeed–but apparently there was something like a sequestration back in the mid eighties, and they didn’t learn their lesson that time, either.

In general I’m in favor of ebola monkeys running loose in congress. It’s a flaw of our political system that, as popular as I’m certain this measure would be, we have no way as a people to enact it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ferret\_Herder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e47774/32.png) [@Ferret\_Herder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ferret_Herder)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/12 "2013-03-04T21:04:23Z")

</div>

Plus it may be worth noting that this is her first term in that office, having been sworn in two months ago.

I agree that I wish they would fix this instead, but since we can’t have that right now, at least she’s doing what is intended to be a public shaming of colleagues.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_the\_Turtle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_the_turtle/32/2926_2.png) [@Fear\_the\_Turtle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_the_Turtle)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 10:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/13 "2013-03-04T22:22:57Z")

</div>

> [@Simplicio](#):
>
> Congress is Constitutionally barred from cutting (or raising) its own salary.

Agreed. But she decided to:

“take a voluntary 8.4 percent pay cut by returning a portion of her monthly salary to the U.S. Treasury”

But why 8.4% and not 20% like other Federal Workers?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ferret\_Herder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e47774/32.png) [@Ferret\_Herder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ferret_Herder)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2013, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/14 "2013-03-04T22:48:26Z")

</div>

Dunno, ask her? I assume it was for the reason given in the linked article, that it matches program cut proportions and highlights that it’s not just salaries (since lots of people froth about “overpaid” government workers) but also important services that are affected.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lochdale](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/edb3f5/32.png) [@Lochdale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lochdale)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2013, 6:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/15 "2013-03-05T06:31:56Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> It’s a nice gesture by Duckworth and I won’t complain about her making it, but let’s not pretend it’s any more than it is. We need these crises to end more than we need gestures.
> 
> There needs to never be a sequestration bill again. It was a bad idea that completely failed at every stage, and Congress did not respond to the threat it posed. The only good thing you can say about it is that things are so bad that at the time it didn’t seem worse than anything else.

Aren’t these crisis a useful tool for the President? He appears to revel in them. We’ll survive particularly if the cuts are properly imposed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clothahump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/51bf81/32.png) [@Clothahump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Clothahump)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2013, 6:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/16 "2013-03-06T18:07:17Z")

</div>

> [@Simplicio](#):
>
> Congress is Constitutionally barred from cutting (or raising) its own salary.

Not so much. Congress sets its own salary. The only restriction of any kind is the 27th Amendment.

> [@](#):
>
> Amendment 27 - Limiting Congressional Pay Increases. Ratified 5/7/1992.
> 
> No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JerseySwamps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e9a140/32.png) [@JerseySwamps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JerseySwamps)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2013, 4:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/17 "2013-03-07T04:41:47Z")

</div>

> [@BigAppleBucky](#):
>
> Will other Congresscritters follow?

:rolleyes:

Was using that word ever clever?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/9f8e36/32.png) [@Rick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rick)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2013, 5:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/nice-move-by-tammy-duckworth-gives-up-8-4-of-her-salary/652006/18 "2013-03-07T05:02:26Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> They can do it for the next congress, right?
> 
> I’m thinking any future sequestration deal needs to include a massive cut to Congress’s salary and budgets. We obviously can’t go for Colbert’s solution, of threatening to open the cage of an ebola monkey in chambers, but we should look for something that makes them take it seriously.

How about we put them on minimum wage until a budget is passed?
