I think that is the case.
Do they know how many voted, if any?
It’s in the original quote from the Governor.
Is that actually criminal? A primary just decides what candidate a given party is going to run in the actual future election, so it seems that ought to be a civil matter between the party and the ineligible voter. But then again, the American electoral system is strange, and I gather it may be the state and not the political parties themselves that administer the primaries.
I think the state must administer it in NJ – same machines, same places. Anyway, even if voting in the primary isn’t criminal, I imagine the 400 votes the governor mentioned were probably general election votes.
I was just showing how easy it is to become a Dem or Rep in NJ.
For that matter, a state could allow noncitizens to vote even in general elections. None do, because it’d be political suicide for anyone to propose it, but it’d be Constitutional.
Thanks.
As long as they are identifying and correcting, all good. I think it’s known that it is happening at low levels in general. It’s why the media always has to characterize the lack of voter fraud as “insignificant” or no evidence of voter fraud that would “sway the election”.
I think most reasonable people recognize that. My concern is less that it happened than for the fodder it provides to the MAGA masses who have demonstrated over and over that they are not reasonable people.
Not full states, but there are places where noncitizens are explicitly allowed to vote in local elections, including DC, San Francisco (for Board of Education elections), and municipalities in Maryland and Vermont.
Politico: Contractor disputes Mikie Sherrill’s claims of NJ voter registration software error
Real story? Too soon to say, except that errors happen and should not be blown out of proportion.
It now appears that than less than 400 of the 6,600 (that is, less than 6 percent) of the people who clicked on the software, that they were non-citizens, later voted.
Some of these less than 6 percent almost surely were non-citizens when they applied for their driver license but had become citizens before voting.
Some of those less than 6 percent almost surely were citizens who accidentally clicked the non-citizen box.
EDIT: Is my last sentence above correct? I’m not 100 percent sure. But if I am correct there, it would only take a tiny percentage of citizens accidentally clicking the non-citizen box for the whole thing to be a nothingburger.
I am 90% convinced the whole thing IS a nothingburger. Except… well, see my previous comment.
I agree with your comments.
It’s just a question of how nothing of a nothingburger it is.
Citizen? That may have sounded, to one or two percent of those applying to drive, like what their great grandmother become when she took the citizen test.
Me, I’m no citizen. I’m an American. 
I’m may lose some of you when I say I got this next link from one of Trump’s Truth Social posts, but it does not mean what Trump implies. And it lends credence my idea that a lot of the supposed less than 400 non-citizen New Jersey voters actually were citizens who naturalized after applying for their driver license, but before voting.
The story this time is from Alaska:
Alaska removes thousands from state’s active voter list, erroneously flagging some citizens
So why is a nobody like me making these points rather than, AFAIK, congressional Democrats? I’m afraid it is because the sausage-making details of voter registration are too easily distorted to make something low-volume and innocent sound like a disgraceful problem. Democratic Party politicians need something they can explain in a soundbite, and unless you are willing to lie, that won’t work here.
Or are Democratic Party politicians already making these points?