# No debates for you! (not in a poll thread, at least)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [February 6, 2010, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943 "2010-02-06T19:57:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/1 "2010-02-06T19:57:06Z")

</div>

Next month marks my tenth anniversary on the SDMB. As best as I can recall, since joining, I have never pitted, or even criticized, a moderator (although I once asked [why the rules of Great Debates seemed not to apply to a certain poster](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=141400)). So, I hope it’s clear that I am not one to complain about the mods here. Indeed, I can only begin to imagine what it must be like to be constantly lambasted, knowing that whatever decision you make is gonna piss _someone_ off (and please spare me the pointing out of how I am thereby contradicting myself by opening this thread). Having said that, there reaches a point where even an unpaid, overworked, and unthanked volunteer is fair game for condemnation.

I am speaking of Czarcasm and her (I think she’s a ‘she’) actions in [this thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=550699) (a poll about whether you think Obama has the country’s best interest at heart). She locked it down. Why? Because people weren’t just voting, they were, get this, debating:eek:

Did the OP’er complain? I don’t think so; his/her responses in the thread gave no clue that he/she was displeased at the way the thread had evolved. Did the debate engender profanity-laced vitriol inappropriate for IMHO? No, no more than many, many others. Was the thread closed to offload the SDMB server? No, in fact, Czarcasm encouraged the offending posters (one of whom received a “moderator warning” for _debating_, btw) to start a new thread in GD, increasing the load if anything. Other than to enforce an unduly narrow, literal interpretation of the forum guidelines, her lockdown served no purpose.

I recognize that a ‘guiding hand’ can be needed on the boards and often fulfills an important role. In this case, though, that hand did nothing more than smack down a spontaneously emerging discussion (OK call it a debate if you want) that, if anything, should have been supported (“fighting ignorance” and all that).

I really meant what I said about the mods having a tough time. And, I am serious when I say that it pains me to open this thread. But, come on, you’ve gotta have some flexibility, especially when sticking strictly to the rules is going to cut off legitimate discussion.

KG

P.S. One brief comment on Czarcasm’s final statement upon closing the thread (“will decide future of political polls in IMHO”). Is she suggesting that because people debated, and didn’t simply vote and then keep their mouths shut, that “political polls” may now be prohibited? I hope I have misinterpreted that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TubaDiva](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tubadiva/32/507_2.png) [@TubaDiva](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TubaDiva)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/2 "2010-02-06T20:08:45Z")

</div>

Czarcasm is most definitely male.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 9:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/3 "2010-02-06T21:59:04Z")

</div>

:smack: Now I owe him two apologies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/4 "2010-02-06T22:01:57Z")

</div>

> [@KarlGauss](#):
>
> :smack: Now I owe him two apologies.

No problem-I’m secure in my masculinity…and I don’t look half-bad in heels.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/5 "2010-02-06T22:16:30Z")

</div>

In the case of the more volitile polls, would it help if I(or the person starting the poll) opened a companion thread in Great Debates, and redirected posters to it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/6 "2010-02-06T22:23:13Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> In the case of the more volitile polls, would it help if I(or the person starting the poll) opened a companion thread in Great Debates, and redirected posters to it?

Sure, that would be a plus. But I still don’t understand why it is forbidden for a debate to emerge, and then to continue in that same poll thread. What is the harm?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VarlosZ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/d78d45/32.png) [@VarlosZ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VarlosZ)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/7 "2010-02-06T22:44:20Z")

</div>

Might not the best option be to (_ahem_) [enable the polling feature in GD](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=550955)? Why is it presently disabled there?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 11:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/8 "2010-02-06T23:00:35Z")

</div>

> [@VarlosZ](#):
>
> Might not the best option be to (_ahem_) [enable the polling feature in GD](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=550955)

Absolutely!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oakminster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/77aa72/32.png) [@Oakminster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Oakminster)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2010, 12:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/9 "2010-02-07T00:35:45Z")

</div>

What’s with this new (to me, anyway) move to sissify IMHO? My understanding has been that IMHO is a forum where less formal discussions take place–fewer calls for cites, but otherwise debating, vigorously discussing, and sometimes snarking was allowed. We’ve already got MPSIMS as the fluffy bunny forum. Recently, it seems, at least to the casual observer, that there has been some unannounced rule change to IMHO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2010, 1:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/10 "2010-02-07T01:01:03Z")

</div>

Keeping debates out of polls [is](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=371223) [not](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=258023) [new](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=242777).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2010, 5:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/11 "2010-02-07T05:53:04Z")

</div>

**Karl** , did you recently change your username from something else?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2010, 10:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/12 "2010-02-07T10:24:57Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> **Karl** , did you recently change your username from something else?

No, it’s been the same for nine years and eleven months.

- KarlGauss, the poster formerly known as KarlGauss

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/13 "2010-02-08T14:25:31Z")

</div>

Huh. I would have thought I’d remember somebody as active as you, but honestly I only remember you going back about a year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/14 "2010-02-08T17:00:12Z")

</div>

> [@Lute Skywatcher](#):
>
> Keeping debates out of polls [is](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=371223) [not](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=258023) [new](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=242777).

Doesn’t make it right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/15 "2010-02-08T17:55:56Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> Huh. I would have thought I’d remember somebody as active as you, but honestly I only remember you going back about a year.

Perhaps he was too blurry to see.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 6:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/16 "2010-02-08T18:04:08Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> Huh. I would have thought I’d remember somebody as active as you, but honestly I only remember you going back about a year.

That’s very interesting for me to hear. In the last year I’ve been off work for a total of almost five months (surgery etc), so I’ve had a LOT more time on my hands. And, _that_ means I have a lot more time to spend here. So, you’re right about my ‘visibility’ being a recent thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crazyjoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f14d63/32.png) [@crazyjoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crazyjoe)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 8:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/17 "2010-02-08T20:33:44Z")

</div>

I don’t recall a lot of overly political threads in IMHO, and I don’t see a reason to clutter up the forum with it now that polls have been enabled. Just allowing polls in GD, which is supposed to be about debates (not some simple yes/no votes) doesn’t seem like the greatest option, either.

I’m not nealry as annoyed with this as other posters are, and I think it was a stupid poll, anyhow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Syntropy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/65b543/32.png) [@Syntropy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Syntropy)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/18 "2010-02-08T21:18:27Z")

</div>

> [@KarlGauss](#):
>
> Next month marks my tenth anniversary on the SDMB. As best as I can recall, since joining, I have never pitted, or even criticized, a moderator (although I once asked [why the rules of Great Debates seemed not to apply to a certain poster](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=141400)).

Not to hijack this terribly, but thank you for the link. The first two lines of Gaudere’s response is so deliciously ironic it’s priceless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SoulFrost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f07891/32.png) [@SoulFrost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SoulFrost)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/19 "2010-02-08T22:36:35Z")

</div>

I’ve always thought that the best way to handle a poll on any controversial topic is to have the debate first, _then_ start the poll. It stops a whole lot of the problems that arise from kneejerk voting like “Hell yeah, I want them to pass the proposed law that would outlaw showing images of nude, underage children”, only to find out in post #485 that the law would also apply to medical texts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 10:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943/20 "2010-02-08T22:50:29Z")

</div>

Yeah, that thread closing didn’t make a whole lot of sense to me.

I guess I sorta kinda see the point that debating could be a bad thing in poll threads and/or IMHO threads, because they’re about expressing opinions and beliefs, not about challenging and defending and pushing those opinions and beliefs, and that very much of the latter could scare off people who only want to do the former.

And I can especially see why you might not want a poll thread to turn into a debate over something other than what the poll itself is about.

Still, I don’t think it’s unreasonable in a poll for people to elaborate on _why_ they “voted” the way they did, or for some back-and-forth discussion to follow. And I didn’t think that particular thread had gotten out of hand.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-debates-for-you-not-in-a-poll-thread-at-least/527943.md?page=2)
