Well, I believe that helping is not first about feeling well for the helper and the intent to do good, but rather, what that person needs, and going in with a cool head and information. But maybe that’s because I actually read what the charity organisations say about the damage done by well-intentioned people : it often backfires if not backed up with information.
If I give 3 Euros directly to a beggar in the street, the money might go to his gang boss. He might use to buy himself booze, pass out and freeze to death. Or he might buy some food for today.
If instead I donate it to a soup kitchen/ tea shop / homeless shelter, then they will work with the real homeless person to help him get off the street long-term. I find that a far better solution.
But I’m not a qualified social worker. I’m also (thankfully) employed, so I don’t have the time of the social workers to talk with the homeless for several months to gain their trust and make them try small steps.
Well, not chasing down - that wallet isn’t running on little legs. But if you sincerely lost / had stolen your wallett, the least to do is to go to the police. First, it means you have a proof for insurance (if you have some), second, it means that if it turns up lost, or if the police catch a thief with his stash, they can give it back to you, and thirdly, the police can help you to get home.
Have you never heard of how a street paper works?? BISS has helped dozens of people in the past decade. I know that Americans like to play cynic and assume that anybody that claims to help really has darker motives and is lying through his teeth about it, but that’s not how things are done in Europe. When organisations claim to help, they substantiate that claim with figures. (Or they loose their status and are outed as frauds). They are not under suspicion of frauds or useless feel-good from the start.
In the case of BISS - which is special because the homeless themselves write part of it - the people who are in difficulties apply there. They have long talks with the social workers there about how many hours a day they can sell, and where they would like to stand - there are fixed points in the subway entrances, but also tours through restaurants at night. Once they decide on part or the full load of about 600 magazines (it’s monthly), they get a contract, meaning they are also again fully insured (health, pension), and they go back to keeping regular hours. They keep close contact with the social workers. When they signal that they feel ready, the social workers help them find a new flat and a proper job they can do. They pay an advance to furnish the new flat. They pay medical treatment if necessary. Everybody can talk to the sellers to confirm that the stories are true - many sellers have their regular customers who talk with them and support them.
So yes, buying this magazine certainly helps better than just giving the money to a random guy.
Yes, it’s supposed to. That’s what’s in our constitution, after all. I said I live in a civilised country, which means a social contract where people help each other. It doesn’t mean that the city goes around handing out money nilly-willy - I said that people have to apply. Many people don’t apply for false shame. Those that do apply and qualify for welfare don’t live like queens at all, they have to count each penny and can’t afford most things I take for granted. So additonal charities jump in to help poor people.
What? You are really weird. Of course we have homeless people! And because we don’t focibly remove them from the street to put them into poor-houses or shelters - people today are free to choose, no matter how destructive, though we try to help them as best as we can - every winter, a few of them will prefer to stay outside under the bridges or similar and will freeze to death. It’s in the newspapers. Along with the old discussion of how tough/ lenient the police should be in chasing them away: safety of citizens versus NIMBY thinking.
I don’t know what kind of Utopia you think you’re living in, but I think you might be a touch self satisfied an deluded.
[/QUOTE]