# No need to vote in November. The winner has already been chosen.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [January 2, 2004, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393 "2004-01-02T23:22:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chaco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/d26b3c/32.png) [@Chaco](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chaco)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2004, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/1 "2004-01-02T23:22:54Z")

</div>

Pat Robertson has spoken:

> [@](#):
>
> I think George Bush is going to win in a walk
> 
> (snip)
> 
> I really believe I’m hearing from the Lord it’s going to be like a blowout election in 2004. It’s shaping up that way

When did Robertson become a valley girl?

The fun continues:

> [@](#):
>
> The Lord has just blessed him," Robertson said of Bush. "I mean, he could make terrible mistakes and comes out of it. It doesn’t make any difference what he does, good or bad, God picks him up because he’s a man of prayer and God’s blessing him.

[From Here.](http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/01/02/politics1412EST0555.DTL)

This is one of the sickest things I have read from this man in a long time.

So, Bush is excused from all of his “terrible mistakes” because he’s a “man of prayer”? That is disgusting.

I am in awe that he would say this out loud. All I can say is WHAT THE FUCK!?

I like Rev. Barry W. Lynn’s response:

> [@](#):
>
> Maybe Pat got a message from Karl Rove and thought it was from God

Even though this made me laugh, I fear Robertson may be right (about Bush winning, not about it being a blowout).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wring](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/838e76/32.png) [@wring](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wring)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2004, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/2 "2004-01-02T23:29:21Z")

</div>

he “ **could** ” make terrible mistakes??? god help us all. the ones he’s done so far, _aren’t_ “terrible mistakes”???

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vanilla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/f19dbf/32.png) [@vanilla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vanilla)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2004, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/3 "2004-01-02T23:49:13Z")

</div>

God is blessing him?

Well,why the heck isn’t God blessing US?!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2004, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/4 "2004-01-02T23:50:10Z")

</div>

He’s just getting warmed up. You ain’t seen nothin’ yet!

Hell, last time out he actually _lost_ the popular vote, and he still rules as though he won by a hefty majority. If he should win the next election 50.01% to 49.99%, he will take that to be an absolute and unqualified mandate from the Real Americans.

And then, verily, the trajectory of the shit will intersect the locus of the fan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leaper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/4bbf92/32.png) [@Leaper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaper)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2004, 11:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/5 "2004-01-02T23:54:06Z")

</div>

Whether you support Bush or not, everyone should be offended at the idea that Robertson’s God wouldn’t care what any individual human does, “good or bad,” and bless him/her nonetheless.

This isn’t part of mainstream Christian doctrine these days, is it? Or did I miss a memo?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chaco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/d26b3c/32.png) [@Chaco](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chaco)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 12:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/6 "2004-01-03T00:16:13Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Leaper \*  
> \*\*Whether you support Bush or not, everyone should be offended at the idea that Robertson’s God wouldn’t care what any individual human does, “good or bad,” and bless him/her nonetheless.
> 
> This isn’t part of mainstream Christian doctrine these days, is it? Or did I miss a memo? \*\*

This is exactly what I found so disturbing. So Bush, or anyone, can do whatever they want and then expect to be forgiven because they are “men (or women) of prayer”?

Maybe now it’s time for me to get that Ferrari I always wanted. Anyone have a screwdriver I can borrow?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Briny\_Deep](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/briny_deep/32/17188_2.png) [@Briny\_Deep](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Briny_Deep)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 12:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/7 "2004-01-03T00:50:14Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by vanilla \*  
> \*\*God is blessing him?
> 
> Well,why the heck isn’t God blessing US?! \*\*

This is both the funniest and most insightful thing I’ve read here in some time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vanilla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/f19dbf/32.png) [@vanilla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vanilla)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 12:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/8 "2004-01-03T00:52:04Z")

</div>

hey, thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Cheatem\_Undhow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/13edae/32.png) [@Dewey\_Cheatem\_Undhow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Cheatem_Undhow)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 1:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/9 "2004-01-03T01:23:27Z")

</div>

- 

> [@](#):
>
> ## Originally posted by Chaco\* \*\*I like Rev. Barry W. Lynn’s response:
> 
> Maybe Pat got a message from Karl Rove and thought it was from God  
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\*\*

Hee! I’m having visions of Rove doing the “speaker implanted in fake tooth” bit from _Real Genius_.

“George Bush will win the election. And Pat? Stop touching yourself.”  
“It really _is_ God!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gest](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9d8465/32.png) [@Gest](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gest)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 4:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/10 "2004-01-03T04:47:53Z")

</div>

Aren’t Osama, fascist Hindu nationalists, the Taliban and the Iranian mullahs also ‘men of prayer’? Is Pat not worried about a prayerful stalemate between all these men of prayer or is it because his is a ‘real god’ and theirs are just idols?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bren\_Cameron\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@Bren\_Cameron\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bren_Cameron_1)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/11 "2004-01-03T15:12:13Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Leaper \*  
> \*\*Whether you support Bush or not, everyone should be offended at the idea that Robertson’s God wouldn’t care what any individual human does, “good or bad,” and bless him/her nonetheless.
> 
> This isn’t part of mainstream Christian doctrine these days, is it? Or did I miss a memo? \*\*

I think you may have missed a memo.

Depending on what branch of mainstream Christianity you’re talking about, one of the more or less logical consequences of God’s grace being completely and entirely independent of your actions is that once you’ve received God’s grace, nothing you can do can change that fact. So if you’ve been saved, you could take a gun to the mall at Christmastime and mow everybody down, torture puppies and kittens, and keep a wardrobe made entirely from baby skin, you’d still be saved. Yeah, I know, why would someone who was granted God’s grace do such things? Good question, but there you go.

Now, not all mainstream Christians consider grace as being so entirely independent of one’s actions, and I’d say that most of those who do wouldn’t think that meant that being saved is a pass to doing whatever the heck you want with no eternal consequences. But PR’s declaration here–that someone who is saved can make terrible mistakes and still be “blessed”–is technically in tune with the beliefs of a fair number of mainstream Christians.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 5:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/12 "2004-01-03T17:46:49Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Leaper \*  
> \*\*Whether you support Bush or not, everyone should be offended at the idea that Robertson’s God wouldn’t care what any individual human does, “good or bad,” and bless him/her nonetheless.
> 
> This isn’t part of mainstream Christian doctrine these days, is it? Or did I miss a memo? \*\*

As **Bren\_Cameron** points out, this idea is an important part of American (and European) religious and intellectual history. The Puritans of Massachusetts spent much of their time trying to find the right balance between “faith” and “works” as criteria for salvation. They rejected strict Calvinist predestinarianism, which said that God had already decided who was saved and who was not, so nothing you did made any difference. This, they believed, was the antinomian heresy that, if followed, would exempt the saved from the obligation to follow the moral or Mosaic (after Moses, and the Ten Commandments) law.

The Puritans also, however, rejected arminianism (named after a chap called Arminius), which was the notion that human will and action alone were the key to salvation. Arminianism was, in large measure, a reaction to Calvinist notions of predestination, and sought to inject human reason and free will into man’s relationship with God.

The Puritans had quite a time trying to reconcile the two aspects of their Protestant faith, and came up with a rather convoluted, but also ingenious compromise called the Covenant of Grace. A fascinating account of all this can be found in the classic study, Perry Miller, _The New England Mind: The Seventeenth Century_.

Others with more knowledge of current practices might want to correct me, but i don’t believe that too many modern denominations in America adopt a strict Calvinist notion of predestination that makes human will and action irrelevant. One of the few groups that i’ve come across that does indeed hold to such a strict predestinarian ethos is Fred Phelps’s Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas.

According to their [website](http://www.godhatesfags.com/main/aboutwbc.html), the WBC believes in the

> [@](#):
>
> doctrines of grace [that] were well summed up by John Calvin in his 5 points of Calvinism: Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints.

They also [reprint](http://www.godhatesfags.com/writings/predestination.html) the full text from a sixteenth century tract called “The Doctrine of Absolute Predestination,” which gives you some idea of the theological and intellectual underpinnings of the movement.

Note: I don’t mean to suggest that all predestinarian Christians are as fucked up and scary as Phelps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![don\_t\_ask](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e68b1a/32.png) [@don\_t\_ask](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/don_t_ask)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/13 "2004-01-03T17:51:14Z")

</div>

Careful guys I think it’s bullshit. In the first thread about this I asked what would win the next at Warwick Farm…even though I gave him two options (including the winner) there was no response.

I don’t think it’s the Lord. I think it’s static.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![1kBR\_Kid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/1/dc4da7/32.png) [@1kBR\_Kid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/1kBR_Kid)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/14 "2004-01-03T19:58:54Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by elucidator \*  
> \*\*Hell, last time out he actually _lost_ the popular vote, and he still rules as though he won by a hefty majority. If he should win the next election 50.01% to 49.99%, he will take that to be an absolute and unqualified mandate from the Real Americans.  
> \*\*

So what? Everyone knew the rules. If Gore had lost the popular vote but won the electoral vote, would you be pissing and moaning 3 years later? Would you still be saying that he needs to concede defeat?

“Still rules as though he won by a hefty majority”??? WTF does that mean? Should he rule with poor self-esteem?

Look dude, I think the whole Gulf War II thing has been a tremendous waste of lives and money, but this “My guy is our saviour, your guy is the Antichrist” bit gets old. It doesn’t matter which side is doing the bitching.

Yeah I voted for GWB but at least my head isn’t so far up my own ass that I can’t criticize him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 8:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/15 "2004-01-03T20:01:48Z")

</div>

You’re right. That’s the least.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gest](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9d8465/32.png) [@Gest](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gest)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/16 "2004-01-03T23:06:21Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by 1kBR Kid \*  
> **So what? Everyone knew the rules. If Gore had lost the popular vote but won the electoral vote, would you be pissing and moaning 3 years later? Would you still be saying that he needs to concede defeat?**

The part that most burns lefties is that there were enormous ‘irregularities’ in the conduct of the poll, all in favour of the Republicans as far as I’ve heard, and George _still_ won. If Gore had won, of course the conservatives would piss and moan (and pray) but they’d have even less grounds to do so. You’re right though; it’s all moot apart from the fact that there are lessons to be learned.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rjung](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/45deac/32.png) [@rjung](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rjung)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2004, 11:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/17 "2004-01-03T23:31:06Z")

</div>

If Gore had won, the conservatives wouldn’t have bothered with pissing and moaning – they’d have moved straight on into Scandalous Rumor-Spreading, “Independent” Investigations, and more of the same Presidential shit-slinging they mastered after eight years of Clinton.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beagle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/85f322/32.png) [@Beagle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beagle)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2004, 3:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/18 "2004-01-04T15:25:57Z")

</div>

The Golden Calf sees Ralph Nader in a landslide.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2004, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/19 "2004-01-04T23:52:13Z")

</div>

If this means Robertson’s flock doesn’t have to show up on Election Day, then where’s the harm?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2004, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393/20 "2004-01-04T23:53:45Z")

</div>

From your lips to the ears of Allah…

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-need-to-vote-in-november-the-winner-has-already-been-chosen/222393.md?page=2)
