# No, old lady, DON'T invite the Jews to church!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-old-lady-dont-invite-the-jews-to-church/485824>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [February 14, 2009, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-old-lady-dont-invite-the-jews-to-church/485824 "2009-02-14T15:38:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ed\_Zotti](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/fbc32d/32.png) [@Ed\_Zotti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ed_Zotti)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2009, 6:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-old-lady-dont-invite-the-jews-to-church/485824/101 "2009-02-26T06:25:35Z")

</div>

> [@Frank](#):
>
> The new rules were posted on 2-24. You are warning (I assume, as there is no **Moderator Note** or **Warning** indication) **Lizard** for a post from 2-21.
> 
> I understood that the new rules were not to be retroactive. Is that an incorrect understanding?

No. I should have been clearer; my apologies. This wasn’t a warning; it was posted for informational purposes. There is much understandable anxiety about what constitutes abuse and what doesn’t under the new rule, and since we had amassed quite a collection of reported posts it seemed like a good idea to go through the list and sort out what was OK and what wasn’t. However, I was doing this hurriedly and not looking at the dates. Again, my apologies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2009, 7:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-old-lady-dont-invite-the-jews-to-church/485824/102 "2009-02-26T07:32:45Z")

</div>

Well, no need to be so reasonable about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2009, 1:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-old-lady-dont-invite-the-jews-to-church/485824/103 "2009-02-26T13:09:23Z")

</div>

> [@Ed\_Zotti](#):
>
> Again, my apologies.

Thank you, Ed. That clears things up for me, anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alan\_Smithee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/2acd7d/32.png) [@Alan\_Smithee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alan_Smithee)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2009, 2:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-old-lady-dont-invite-the-jews-to-church/485824/104 "2009-02-26T14:18:38Z")

</div>

I feel bad. I reported **Lizard** ’s post. I did it before the new pit rules. I reported it erroneously because I forgot we were in the Pit; I had thought we were in GD or MPSIMS. The discussion was going so politely, **Lizard** ’s insult stood out to me. I think it was inappropriate, but I don’t like the new rules, and I’m glad **Lizard** wasn’t actually warned.

Maybe a rule could be crafted that would exclude only insults I find inappropriate–insults that seem to exist only _because_ a discussion happens to be in the Pit, and are just sort of tacked on without adding to the discussion or even responding to an apparent slight. I used to avoid the Pit precisely because of such posts, which were so frequent they made any actual discussion almost impossible. But it hasn’t been that way in a very long time, and I don’t think **Ed** ’s rules serve any purpose at this point. The excellent and reasonable modding by **Giraffe** and **fluiddruid** did more to elevate the tone of the Pit than any rule possibly could.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![katannah](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/a5b964/32.png) [@katannah](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/katannah)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2009, 9:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-old-lady-dont-invite-the-jews-to-church/485824/105 "2009-02-26T21:56:35Z")

</div>

> [@mswas](#):
>
> Yeah fuck Christians they suck, they should be strung up for every awkward attempt to relate that they might make.
> 
> God I hate those fucking worthless Christians, I wish they’d just shut the fuck up and not bother the rest of us!

Bless your little heart.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2009, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-old-lady-dont-invite-the-jews-to-church/485824/106 "2009-02-26T22:00:29Z")

</div>

> [@Ed\_Zotti](#):
>
> No. I should have been clearer; my apologies. This wasn’t a warning; it was posted for informational purposes. There is much understandable anxiety about what constitutes abuse and what doesn’t under the new rule, and since we had amassed quite a collection of reported posts it seemed like a good idea to go through the list and sort out what was OK and what wasn’t. However, I was doing this hurriedly and not looking at the dates. Again, my apologies.

:: grumbling ::

Great. Now I am no longer justified in sticking red-hot pins into this voodoo doll I made of you. And the spell binding it to you is only good for 24 hours. I might as well throw the damn thing away now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2009, 10:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-old-lady-dont-invite-the-jews-to-church/485824/107 "2009-02-26T22:11:43Z")

</div>

> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#):
>
> Now I am no longer justified in sticking red-hot pins into this voodoo doll I made of you.

…and that stops you, when?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-old-lady-dont-invite-the-jews-to-church/485824.md?page=5)
