I don’t expect any Warnings for posting this, since my accusation (which is entirely true) is that the cite provided is the one making the lie, not any poster.
Regards,
Shodan
I don’t expect any Warnings for posting this, since my accusation (which is entirely true) is that the cite provided is the one making the lie, not any poster.
Regards,
Shodan
It’s hardly impersonating a mod, since he wasn’t doing the < MOD HAT ON > thing.
Mods don’t use that construction in this forum because they’re always speaking as mods here.
Wanna bet?
I can instantly find a bunch of “Mod whistle blows: TWEET” type intros.
Pfui.
What does this acronym mean? I’ve never heard it before…
Fooey.
It’s a spitting sound.
What does this acronym mean? I’ve never heard it before…
I think it’s meant to be a joking refusal, “Fooey”.
Man, that was weird. Did you ever have that dream where you’re moderating a thread and everyone’s laughing, and then you look down and realise you’re not wearing any pants?
You mean “not wearing any jackboots”.
Regards,
Shodan
Man, that was weird. Did you ever have that dream where you’re moderating a thread and everyone’s laughing, and then you look down and realise you’re not wearing any pants?
Heh, you know you are in trouble when you see [mod pants off]
Heh, you know you are in trouble when you see [mod pants off]
I guess that would mean you’re about to get fucked–so it would be different from usual in what way now?
Wanna bet?
I can instantly find a bunch of “Mod whistle blows: TWEET” type intros.
With my luck I’d lose. It is odd though; this is the one forum where mods always have their hats on. They’re replying ex cathedra to members’ questions about the message board.
Since the moderator said earlier on that this is NOT the place for joke posts, and since this has now degenerated into nothing but jokes, the thead is closed.
So, if I’m getting this straight–mods can insult posters anywhere they like, including ATMB, with impunity but “impersonating a mod is out of line.” I suppose this makes sense, since a true and accurate impersonation of a mod would inevitably result in blatant insults to someone in an inappropriate forum.
Wonder if anyone will bother to update the various rules stickies to reflect the “mustn’t impersonate a mod” rule? And is it cynical of me to speculate that a more accurate version would be “don’t impersonate a mod and do a better job of moderating than the real mods are doing because that causes butthurtedness and rather than step up the mods’ game we find it easier to tell people to shut up?”
I really sometimes don’t know why I bother, but let’s go back to ABC’s for the sake of the obviously new poster.
Since this thread has now become nothing but jokes (and I assume SmartAleq’s post to be another such), it will be closed.
Since closing the thread now will result in nasty comments about me being the last poster, the thread will be closed at some future time in the next hour most likely, selected at random.
If everyone wants me to go back and hand out Warnings for personal insults, accusations of lying in GD, and assorted other problems, I’ll be happy to do that.
The thread will remain closed, however. I explicitly noted that none of the topics were prohibited–not even Intention’s desperate need to rant on about the Green Peril–but once a certain level of hostility has been reached in a thread, closure is the only way to ensure that that cycle is broken.
**@Dex–**And, just for the record, you don’t consider this bolded statement to be an insult to the poster? Because it sure isn’t referencing a post.
I really sometimes don’t know why I bother, but let’s go back to ABC’s for the sake of the obviously new poster.
You don’t think that this statement is insulting and demeaning?
HA! Last post!
Not if I can help it!
Bitchin’!
You don’t think that this statement is insulting and demeaning?
Thanks haj, but I’m sure **Dex ** simply didn’t notice the paid up status of my membership, the 2005 join date and the 3600 posts. Because it’s not allowed for mods to insult posters, y’know.