# No pain and suffering is worth $175 million.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 2, 2006, 8:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123 "2006-06-02T08:30:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/41 "2006-06-02T17:02:44Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=mhendo]  
Why would you assume the facts are as presented by the plaintiff?

[/QUOTE]  
For purposes of discussing the topic, other assumptions are pretty dull. If you assume he’s lying, then the suit is a dead non-starter with zero merit. If you assume nothing about the plaintiff’s claim, how can you make an argument about it?

Assuming the plaintiff has a legitimate beef (legally supported or not) at least lets you discuss whether or not such an act is, or should be something you can sue over.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/42 "2006-06-02T17:07:57Z")

</div>

It’s not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/43 "2006-06-02T17:08:13Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cheesesteak]  
For purposes of discussing the topic, other assumptions are pretty dull. If you assume he’s lying, then the suit is a dead non-starter with zero merit. If you assume nothing about the plaintiff’s claim, how can you make an argument about it?

Assuming the plaintiff has a legitimate beef (legally supported or not) at least lets you discuss whether or not such an act is, or should be something you can sue over.  
[/QUOTE]  
But even the article linked by the OP allows you to make some evaluation of whether the plaintiff’s claim is reasonable or not. You don’t have to assume he’s intentionally lying, but neither do you have to assume that his version of events is the only possible one, or even the most valid one. Especially when people are actually providing transcripts of what he said.

Let me take the transcript of his comments, provided by **Larry Mudd** , and ask a question based on **Diogenes** ’s most recent post:

How might changing the context have materially altered the meaning of the soldier’s statements? As far as i can see, those statements are pretty clear and unambiguous, no matter the context.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/44 "2006-06-02T17:10:00Z")

</div>

Actually I shouldn’t say you can’t sue. You can legally TRY to sue anyone for anything, but this complaint will never survive the most peremptory challenge.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/45 "2006-06-02T17:12:18Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Diogenes the Cynic]  
I didn’t ask for a definition of “documentary,” I wanted a cite for your claim that there is any legal difference between how clips can be used in parodies and how they can be used in documentaries.  
[/quote]  
Cite?

That is, cite my “claim” that there is a legal difference between parodies and documentaries.

> [@](#):
>
> The allegations _as presented_ (i.e. even if everything the soldier says as true) still do not amount to an actionable claim and his complaint will be dismissed for lack of merit.

Not having a legally actionable claim does not mean that his complaint is without merit. You do not have a legally actionable claim that Bush started an “illegal” war, yet that claim has merit, doesn’t it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kalhoun](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/3bc359/32.png) [@Kalhoun](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kalhoun)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/46 "2006-06-02T17:14:54Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=UncleBeer]  
And here are their rules for documentaries:

[http://www.oscars.org/79academyawards/rules/rule12.html](http://www.oscars.org/79academyawards/rules/rule12.html)  
That’s it. Nothing about bias.  
[/QUOTE]

Well, I stand corrected. I will concede that it’s a documentary, though unbalanced. I believe him to be documenting truthfully. I’d like to see what the soldier’s entire statement was, since he’s claiming it was quoted out of context. So far, I’m still in Moore’s corner.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/47 "2006-06-02T17:18:42Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cheesesteak]  
Cite?

That is, cite my “claim” that there is a legal difference between parodies and documentaries.  
[/QUOTE]

Well, it sounds like you’re trying to make a legal distinction between parody and documentary with this quote:

> [@Cheesesteak](#):
>
> Taking somebody’s quote out of context to change the meaning is fine for the Daily Show, not for a Documentary. If these companies are earning a mountain of money by editing footage in this way, making people seem to say things they didn’t mean, then they will get tagged by suits like this. The Daily Show does it, it’s comedy, parody, nobody actually thinks it is your view. Moore does it in a wildly popular movie, and it’s going to take a lot of explaining to make it clear that’s not what you meant.

If you weren’t claiming a legal distinction between the two, I’m not sure what you were trying to say.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/48 "2006-06-02T17:30:03Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cheesesteak]  
Cite?

That is, cite my “claim” that there is a legal difference between parodies and documentaries.  
[/quote]

Well that was definitely the impression I got. When you said

> [@Cheesesteak](#):
>
> Taking somebody’s quote out of context to change the meaning is fine for the Daily Show, not for a Documentary.

What do you mean by “fine” and “not fine” if you’re not talking about legalities?

> [@](#):
>
> Not having a legally actionable claim does not mean that his complaint is without merit. You do not have a legally actionable claim that Bush started an “illegal” war, yet that claim has merit, doesn’t it?

“Dismissed for lack of Merit” is a legal phrase. It means that even if the allegations are true there is still no actionable claim against the defendant.

In this case the complaint lacks merit both in the legal sense and the informal sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/49 "2006-06-02T17:31:16Z")

</div>

Miller, why is it that the only distinctions worth talking about are the ones written in the law? There’s more to the world than what’s written into the law.

It’s sad when right and wrong is decided by a consult with the legal team, and it’s deemed A-OK when you can’t be successfully sued over it.

Can’t I just fucking say something isn’t RIGHT without having to prove it’s illegal?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Mudd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f14d63/32.png) [@Larry\_Mudd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Mudd)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/50 "2006-06-02T17:31:29Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=mhendo]  
Let me take the transcript of his comments, provided by **Larry Mudd** …  
[/QUOTE]  
Now that I’ve reread the article and the transcript, I think I really ought to point something out:

I think the transcript may record snippets from several soldiers without indicating that different people are speaking. (There is no differentiation between narration and anything else – what I was looking at may have come from a subtitle track or something – I haven’t seen the film since it was in theatres, and don’t remember this part very well.)

The article says that Damon was injured changing a tire, and that doesn’t fit with the remark about being ambushed.

So I guess it _is_ still possible that he had absolutely no criticisms of the administration and was totally happy with his medical treatment, but had his remarks placed in the context of other men who were dissatisfied. Does anyone have a copy of the DVD handy for clarification?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/51 "2006-06-02T17:34:57Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cheesesteak]  
Miller, why is it that the only distinctions worth talking about are the ones written in the law? There’s more to the world than what’s written into the law.

It’s sad when right and wrong is decided by a consult with the legal team, and it’s deemed A-OK when you can’t be successfully sued over it.

Can’t I just fucking say something isn’t RIGHT without having to prove it’s illegal?  
[/QUOTE]

Well, it is a thread about a **lawsuit** , and all. Pardon me for assuming you were posting something relevant to the fucking OP. I’ll try not to make that mistake again in the future.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Merijeek](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f05b48/32.png) [@Merijeek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Merijeek)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/52 "2006-06-02T17:48:17Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cheesesteak]  
Miller, why is it that the only distinctions worth talking about are the ones written in the law? There’s more to the world than what’s written into the law.

It’s sad when right and wrong is decided by a consult with the legal team, and it’s deemed A-OK when you can’t be successfully sued over it.

Can’t I just fucking say something isn’t RIGHT without having to prove it’s illegal?  
[/QUOTE]

Since what you’re describing covers probably 90% of **Bricker** ’s posts, will you point me toward one where you lambaste him over this?

-Joe

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 5:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/53 "2006-06-02T17:52:44Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Miller]  
Well, it is a thread about a **lawsuit** , and all.  
[/QUOTE]  
Not every post in a lawsuit discussion thread is about the finer points of law. In all fairness, when I’m not making a point about the law, and people are going to think I am, I should be clearer that I’m talking ethics and not law.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Excalibre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@Excalibre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Excalibre)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/54 "2006-06-02T18:38:46Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=kanicbird]  
Can’t this guy get anything based on the son of Sam law, or would that require a conviction of MM of aiding our emeny first?

To me, if you claim it’s a documentry and I catch you in a lie that has to be intentional on your part in that documentry the whole documentry can not be trusted. This case is just another example of MM’s intent to mislead and further discredits the whole movie. At this point nothing MM says on the subject can be trusted.

If MM didn’t claim it to be a documentry I could forgive mistruths in it.  
[/QUOTE]

You’re saying you think that filming a documentary you disagree with is treasonous?

Have you ever heard of freedom of speech? You’re calling for one of our most cherished and important rights to be abrogated because someone used it to express something you don’t like - actually, wouldn’t that mean _you’re_ the one giving aid to our enemies? Since they hate our freedoms, then clearly you’re helping them out by trying to destroy our freedoms.

I know this phrase has been used facetiously, but I’m deadly serious. Why do you hate America, **kanicbird**? Why do you hate the freedoms it stands for?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Merijeek](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f05b48/32.png) [@Merijeek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Merijeek)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 6:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/55 "2006-06-02T18:57:53Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Excalibre]  
Why do you hate the freedoms it stands for?  
[/QUOTE]

Because, for some reason, libruls are allowed to exercise them.

What kind of bullshit system allows that?

-Joe

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2006, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/56 "2006-06-02T20:57:29Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Larry Mudd]  
Now that I’ve reread the article and the transcript, I think I really ought to point something out:

I think the transcript may record snippets from several soldiers without indicating that different people are speaking. (There is no differentiation between narration and anything else – what I was looking at may have come from a subtitle track or something – I haven’t seen the film since it was in theatres, and don’t remember this part very well.)

The article says that Damon was injured changing a tire, and that doesn’t fit with the remark about being ambushed.

So I guess it _is_ still possible that he had absolutely no criticisms of the administration and was totally happy with his medical treatment, but had his remarks placed in the context of other men who were dissatisfied. Does anyone have a copy of the DVD handy for clarification?  
[/QUOTE]  
**Larry** , having just viewed the relevant section, i can tell you that you are indeed correct that your transcript actually comprises two different conversations from two different people. Here’s how it actually appears in the film:

> [@](#):
>
> **Damon** :
> 
> I still feel like I have hands. And the pain is like my hands are being crushed in a vise. But they do a lot to help it and they take a lot of the edge off it.
> 
> It makes it a lot more tolerable.
> 
> **Soldier at Blanchfield Army Community Hospital, Fort Campbell, KY** :
> 
> I was injured in late April on patrol in Baghdad.
> 
> A couple of guys come out and ambushed us. I got nerve damage and stuff like that. I’ve got a lot of pain. I’m constantly in pain. I take a lot of morphine to help with that and stuff. I’m doing… doing… You know, just readjusting. Getting life back on track, you know what I’m saying?
> 
> I’m not gonna do what it is that I did before.
> 
> I was a Republican for quite a few years, and for some reason, they… they conduct business in a very dishonest way. I’m gonna be incredibly active in the Democratic Party down where I live once I get out. I’m gonna definitely do my best… …to ensure that the Democrats win control.

As far as i can tell, that is Damon’s only appearance in the movie.

For those who actually want to see Damon’s segment in a slightly broader context, i’ve uploaded a short clip from the movie to my webspace. This clip is under 2 minutes long, from a 2+ hour movie, and i think that the length and the (poor) quality of the clip put it well within the realm of fair use for purposes of education or criticism.

[Link](https://jshare.johnshopkins.edu/mhender4/public_html/f911.avi) (XVid avi file, about 4Mb)

The clip starts with U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott, then there are a couple of short comments from other injured soldiers, then Damon appears at about the 24sec mark, followed by the other soldier in the hospital in Kentucky.

As far as i can tell, the main reason for having Damon in the film was as an example of just how horrific some of the returning soldiers’ injuries were. Sure, Moore had a point to make, and he used Damon to help him make it, but i think it’s a complete stretch to suggest that Damon’s words were taken out of context or in any way misrepresented in the movie, or that it was made to appear as if Damon opposed the war.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scylla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a5b964/32.png) [@Scylla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scylla)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2006, 1:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/57 "2006-06-03T01:10:50Z")

</div>

I have no opinion on the legaility of the thing or the merits of the suit.

To me though, it’s a real dick move on Michael Moore’s part to exploit a horribly wounded soldier and his wounds and misrepresent his statements to serve an agenda the soldier is opposed to.

In an interview I saw MM talked about how he made his documentaries because he really does love the country and he can’t stand to see how people are exploited and misled and he wants to present the truth. Then he sang “God Bless America” to show that he was serious about wanting to sing it (with whoever, I forget) and was not trying to belittle it or be ironic.

I understand that mistakes happen, and that you can edit things and make bad decisions without bad intent.

I think if MM acknowledged the error and apologized to the soldier, I would be forced to take him a lot more seriously than I do, and actually take seriously the respect and concern he claims to have for our soldiers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scylla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a5b964/32.png) [@Scylla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scylla)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2006, 1:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/58 "2006-06-03T01:14:20Z")

</div>

There’s nothing about this on MMs website and I searched within the site for the name of the soldier, and there’s nothing there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2006, 1:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/59 "2006-06-03T01:18:22Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Scylla]  
To me though, it’s a real dick move on Michael Moore’s part to exploit a horribly wounded soldier and his wounds and misrepresent his statements to serve an agenda the soldier is opposed to.  
[/QUOTE]  
Exactly how are the soldier’s statements misrepresented?

No-one has yet offered any compelling argument that this was even the case. Hell, if you’re going to assert that something bad was done, at least watch the video i posted and make an argument for this alleged misrepresentation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2006, 1:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123/60 "2006-06-03T01:21:58Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Scylla]  
There’s nothing about this on MMs website and I searched within the site for the name of the soldier, and there’s nothing there.  
[/QUOTE]

:rolleyes:

Why the hell would there be?

If someone was suing you for untold millions of dollars, would you make a public comment about the issue on your website?

If he apologizes, he effectively admits wrongdoing, lending support to the plaintiff’s case, and if he makes any statements in his own defense it just gives the plaintiff’s lawyers more ammunition for their case.

Jesus, i thought even the biggest fucking dunces on this board realized that speaking publicly about an ongoing lawsuit in which one is involved is usually considered a Very Bad Idea.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-pain-and-suffering-is-worth-175-million/359123.md?page=4)
