No prescription needed to execute?

Sorry for the double post. I jumbled the quotes on the first try.

Sounds about right.

http://www.phadp.org/botched.html

http://members.tripod.com/~gadbuddhaa/thelethalinjectiongurney.htm

atypicaljoe.com (pdf) discussed in second cite.

My clumsy grammar (and spelling) aside, I think the spirit of my question is pretty clear. What I’m asking is, by what legal process are these drugs obtained and administered by non-medical persons.
But I see this has become a very large question, as Gfactor linked above, so I’ll wait and see how it shakes out. Right this minute they’re discussing the issue on the news.
It does seem odd to me that the feds will (sorta) bend the drug laws to kill someone, but strictly enforce those laws in the case of a herb that just might help a sick person.
Peace,
mangeorge

You know something, Otto? You didn’t seem very confused in your first two replies.

Dammit, and I’ve used that joke as a mnemonic for years?

scr4, see, there’s this lion who goes into a bar to order a drink. A floozy at the end of the bar looks up at him and says, “Screw you, ya big jerk!”

The bartender shakes his head, and says, “Sorry, we don’t serve your type in here.”

“Ha ha!” brays the floozy. “Yer not WANTED, why don’tcha GET THE HELL OUT!”

The lion just says, “Look, man, I’ve had a long day and all I want is a beer.”

The bartender shakes his head and says, “Can’t do it. Owner doesn’t like lions. Don’t make me call the bouncers over.”

The floozy yells, “Hey, Frank! theresaTROUBLEMAKER HERE! a real LION! KICKHISASS!”

The lion’s had just about enough. He roars, leaps over to the floozy, kills her, and eats her. And falls over unconscious.

He wakes up the next day and says to the bartender, “What just happened?”

Bartender shrugs. “Its the bar bitch you ate.”

Daniel

“Y’know, Randy…there’s such a thing as being too helpful.”

Found this paper about pharmaceutical companies and lethal injection:

Drug Companies and Their Role in Aiding Executions

It’s written/sponsored by The National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and is biased accodingly, but it appears to be on the level about which companies make and supply Sodium Thiopental, Pancuronium Bromide, and Potassium Chloride and how they may be obtained by the states. There’s also this section on “How Lethal Injection Drugs Are Obtained.”

The Texas portion cites to this article in footnote: “DA: Execution Drugs Obtained Legally,” Associated Press (Nov. 2, 2001). If anyone (e.g. samclem) has access to a database that’ll pull that story, wow us, please.

Great Googling.

The article is in the middle of this archive. Ctrl-F and search for “execution drugs” http://venus.soci.niu.edu/~archives/ABOLISH/apr02/0648.html

Well done! :smiley:

This article contains additional discussion of the issues discussed here.

That article makes some excellent points. But while there some parallels between enabling abortion and enabling execution, we musn’t let decisions about one limit decisions about the other.
Peace,
mangeorge

Yeah. I posted it mainly for the stuff about the death penalty:

What concerns me is that California (and other states) could attempt to pass legislation prohibiting a doctor from refusing to participate in an execution, as they did for the refusal by pharmacists to dispense morning-after pills.
Not likely, I’m pretty sure, but given the popular attitude toward the death penalty, who knows.

Maybe I missed it but, I found no where in your link that said police may prescribe scheduled medications.
In fact, several of the groups listed are only allowed to handle the medications, as in transfering them from manufacturer to pharmacy, not despense them.

If I missed something, please set me straight.
Thanks.

There was a segment on NPR about this issue today: http://www.here-now.org/shows/2006/03/20060323_2.asp