# No, you don't need a semiautomatic rifle

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 11, 2021, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705 "2021-02-11T17:51:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 12:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/41 "2021-02-12T00:47:55Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> No hostility or mockery was intended; I have no control over what people who replied before you did have posted

There are some that find the question itself, in _any_ form, to be insulting and/or ignorant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 1:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/42 "2021-02-12T01:02:31Z")

</div>

> [@Jackmannii](#):
>
> It would help if those who promote stricter gun laws would master the simplest of “arcane technical details”, such as the definition of a semi-automatic weapon, which babale thinks means a gun “capable of firing dozens of rounds in rapid succession” and which many equate to “assault weapons”.

I am well aware of the definition of a semi automatic firearm, thank you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 1:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/43 "2021-02-12T01:03:37Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> There are some that find the question itself, in _any_ form, to be insulting and/or ignorant.

Can we trust such people to wield deadly firearms? Clearly they lack good judgment if they can’t handle being questioned.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wesley\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wesley_clark/32/20581_2.png) [@Wesley\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wesley_Clark)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 2:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/44 "2021-02-12T02:10:27Z")

</div>

democracy can function perfectly fine without civilian arms. It does so in a whole bunch of western democracies with strong gun control.

In America people don’t want to give up their guns. Theres also the fear that the wrong people have guns in America (angry white nationalist fascists are heavily armed), and that the police sympathize with them so it would be a mistake for their targets (feminists, minorities, leftists, LGBT, muslims) to not also be armed in case they try to overthrow the government again. Unilaterally disarming while fascists keep their guns and the police sometimes refuse to protect marginalized people is a bad idea.

I support gun control when its done scientifically, but rifles and shotguns are not used in many firearm deaths. Handguns make up the vast majority of gun deaths

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 2:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/45 "2021-02-12T02:57:33Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> I am well aware of the definition of a semi automatic firearm, thank you.

Are you? You clearly think semi-auto rifles are some sort of massive critical danger to the public , and simple math shows they are not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oredigger77](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/oredigger77/32/3181_2.png) [@Oredigger77](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Oredigger77)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 3:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/46 "2021-02-12T03:14:05Z")

</div>

I personally hunt with a semi auto 20 gauge shotgun. The decreased recoil is the only way my artificial shoulders can handle a day shooting trap with 100 or 200 rounds and during duck season it isn’t uncommon to shoot 20 or 30 times and I like being able to move my arms afterwards. Of course like every other hunting shotun mine only holds 3 rounds so you won’t be taking it on a murder spree.

Other hunting reasons I have used a semi auto are [hogs](https://youtu.be/al30ANiHMJQ), [Prarie dogs](https://youtu.be/3I4sFBTqfLs), or [coyotes](https://youtu.be/ojX9mUw7kpg). I don’t personally own a semi auto rifle but borrow my friends when we go out on one of those hunts.

I also always carry a gun when I’m hiking, backpacking or fishing since there are entirely too many bears, mountain lions, and apparently grey wolves now. I normally carry a 357 revolver but I’m planning on moving to a semi auto 10mm this fall.

Of course, none of these reasons will be good enough for the OP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 3:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/47 "2021-02-12T03:16:06Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Are you? You clearly think semi-auto rifles are some sort of massive critical danger to the public , and simple math shows they are not.

Risk-reward. As stated, you don’t need them for any reason, so any harm they cause is pure harm.

You also don’t need handguns, and yes, those do cause way more damage, for just as little reward; but the exchange that prompted THIS thread involved rifles specifically.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 3:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/48 "2021-02-12T03:35:56Z")

</div>

Realistically, something like bear spray is much better at actually protecting you against wild animal attacks; and if overzealous hunters hadn’t wiped out nearly all the wolves, bears, and mountain lions from North America, hogs, coyotes, and similar pests would pose much less of a problem. (Incidentally, attempts to control coyote populations through hunting have led to a boom in coyote populations… cite below)

> **[Why Killing Coyotes Doesn’t Make Livestock Safer](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-killing-coyotes-doesn-rsquo-t-make-livestock-safer/)**
>
> There is no clear evidence that lethal control works to reduce human-predator conflict. It can even make the problem worse

But of course, those are facts, and facts don’t feel as good as shooting a coyote in the face.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 4:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/49 "2021-02-12T04:16:21Z")

</div>

It seems that this thread is specifically about why banning semiautomatic rifles would be harmful to hunting. It seems the answer is that it would not be. Thus such is a bad argument for keeping semiautomatic rifles.

Arguing that only a small minority of gun deaths are caused by semiautomatic rifles would be a valid argument. My question is, why is it that it seems semiautomatics are used in mass shootings, and do you think that having to cock or use a handgun would change how mass shootings play out?

Because most of the stuff about banning semiautomatic rifles seems to be based on the goal of stopping mass shootings or reducing their effects, not about gun crime or shootings in general. An argument for why it wouldn’t help there would be good.

Though I’d point out that always arguing against anything to be done about an issue but never arguing for something else to be done generally suggests you don’t think that the issue is important.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oredigger77](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/oredigger77/32/3181_2.png) [@Oredigger77](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Oredigger77)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 4:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/50 "2021-02-12T04:17:41Z")

</div>

Sure there are lots of ways to deal with coyotes that doesn’t mean when hunting is the chosen method that you should choose a lesser way. What is your suggestion for for wild boars? How about Prarie dogs? And of course calling and shooting them is fun and the primary reason it’s done.

The real question you want to ask is me having fun worth 500 deaths a year? [I](https://uscgboating.org/statistics/accident_statistics.php) [say](https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/02/03/55-mph-saves-lives/8ad4f24d-9bd9-4c78-a9da-054358366f71/) [absolutly](https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/lawnmowers-kill-more-people-bears-sharks-alligators-each-year-1529280%3famp=1).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![leswax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/85f322/32.png) [@leswax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/leswax)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 4:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/51 "2021-02-12T04:18:25Z")

</div>

The general impression I get from reading the thread is that handguns kill people and long guns don’t (very often, except for when they do spectacularly). If this isn’t a derailment of the thread, I’d like to hear a defense of semiautomatic handguns. If it is, I’ll be happy to move it along to another thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 4:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/52 "2021-02-12T04:36:32Z")

</div>

> [@Oredigger77](#):
>
> Sure there are lots of ways to deal with coyotes that doesn’t mean when hunting is the chosen method that you should choose a lesser way

Hunting them doesn’t work. That is the point.

> [@Oredigger77](#):
>
> What is your suggestion for for wild boars? How about Prarie dogs?

Reintroduce their natural predators and try to restore the ecosystem (if this is even possible now considering how much we have damaged it) to an equilibrium. But you certainly can’t kill your way out of a mess we killed our way into.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 4:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/53 "2021-02-12T04:37:48Z")

</div>

> [@Oredigger77](#):
>
> The real question you want to ask is me having fun worth 500 deaths a year? [I](https://uscgboating.org/statistics/accident_statistics.php) [say](https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/02/03/55-mph-saves-lives/8ad4f24d-9bd9-4c78-a9da-054358366f71/) [absolutly](https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/lawnmowers-kill-more-people-bears-sharks-alligators-each-year-1529280%3famp=1).

This link seems to show that you are silly for carrying a gun to defend yourself against bears, wolves, or mountain lions; you should carry a gun to defend yourself against lawnmowers!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 4:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/54 "2021-02-12T04:43:14Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> > [@Oredigger77](#):
> >
> > Sure there are lots of ways to deal with coyotes that doesn’t mean when hunting is the chosen method that you should choose a lesser way
> 
> Hunting them doesn’t work. That is the point.

To clarify: hunting coyotes to control their population is like kicking dandelions to clear them from your lawn.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D\_Anconia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@D\_Anconia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D_Anconia)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 5:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/55 "2021-02-12T05:12:36Z")

</div>

Your linked article uses the term “may” in terms of causing X or Y more than once. That’s not compelling evidence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 5:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/56 "2021-02-12T05:21:18Z")

</div>

Yes, they use “may” when interpreting results; but the results themselves (despite huge efforts to cull coyotes their populations and range are both rapidly growing) are not in question.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mordecaiB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mordecaib/32/7725_2.png) [@mordecaiB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mordecaiB)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 6:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/57 "2021-02-12T06:13:45Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> You dont take coyotes with a rimfire

But you do need a weapon that can kill a man and fires 30 rounds? You must be a terrible shot. Why not just shoot them with your bolt action hunting rifle?

Plus, the **MightyCurmugeon** claimed he needed his rifle to protect himself from animals. Coyotes are rarely pack hunters and you can chase them off with a loud noise or a thrown rock. The chance of a coyote being a threat to humans is miniscule. Kind of like the chance your house would be attacked by a roving hoard of bikers so you need to be as heavily armed ad a soldier in a combat zone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SCAdian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/scadian/32/3292_2.png) [@SCAdian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SCAdian)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 6:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/58 "2021-02-12T06:34:33Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> > [@Ruken](#):
> >
> > You use “need” and “necessitates”. I never did. The poster you quote in the OP doesn’t. No, nobody needs them. They want them
> 
> That’s not what the poster I quoted said. Apparently you know nothing about hunting.

Please quote the bit where the poster you quoted said he needs a semiauto.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 7:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/59 "2021-02-12T07:03:41Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> When gaming computers kill thousands of people a year, get back to me with that analogy.

It depends on how seriously you take climate change.

> **[Greening the Beast - Taming-the-Energy-Use-of-Gaming-Computers](https://sites.google.com/site/greeningthebeast/energy/taming-the-energy-use-of-gaming-computers)**
>
> Taming the Energy Use of Gaming Computers
> Nathaniel Mills
> GreeningTheBeast.org
> nathanielmills50@gmail.com
> Evan Mills
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
> evanmills.lbl.gov
> emills@lbl.gov
> Published in the journal Energy Efficiency, this new study...

From the site, the average gaming computer uses 1400 kWh per year, based on 4.4 hours of play per day. If you play more, or have a top-end gaming system, adjust upwards accordingly.

Across all energy types, the U.S. averages emitting about .9 kg of CO2 per kWh. So, if you are an average gamer on a gaming PC, your activity is pumping about 1320kg of CO2 into the air every year. That, by the way, is more than 1/4 of the CO2 put out by the average car in a year. And cars do useful things. If we are going to limit cars, the least we can do is get rid of gaming computers first, right?

Industry sources say about 35% of Americans play games on PCs. If half of those have ‘gaming’ PCs, that’s roughly 55 million gaming PCs. That means PC gamers emit about 72,600,000 metric tonnes of CO2 per year that wouldn’t be emitted if they just read a book instead. Or they could take up shooting. It’s fun, and guns don’t emit CO2.

Aside from the CO2 disaster, gaming PCs cost money that could go to needy people for a laptop (which uses less than 1/10 the energy), and books make you smarter and you learn things. No one needs a gaming PC, and they are a pernicious influence and helping to destroy the planet. Is it really worth pumping millions of kg of CO2 into the air just so you can play games? Isn’t burning CO2 like that for pure amusement kind of a socially awful thing to do?

No one needs a gaming PC. In the fight against climate change, they are low hanging fruit. Getting rid of them and mandating non-CO2 consuming entertainment in place of them would be like pulling millions of cars off the road instantly. It’s a no-brainer, really.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2021, 9:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705/60 "2021-02-12T09:58:12Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_Stone](#):
>
> No one needs a gaming PC. In the fight against climate change, they are low hanging fruit. Getting rid of them and mandating non-CO2 consuming entertainment in place of them would be like pulling millions of cars off the road instantly. It’s a no-brainer, really.

I’d take you more seriously if you actually wanted to do something about climate change.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/no-you-dont-need-a-semiautomatic-rifle/932705.md?page=4)
