# Non Nude Teen Web Sites **URL:** \ **Category:** Great Debates\ **Created:** [March 19, 2002, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094 "2002-03-19T20:39:01Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 10\ **Page:** 7
**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2015, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094/121 "2015-02-10T12:45:35Z")
You can make a report without writing a “Reported” post, as well. But then that leads to mods getting a dozen reports on the same problem. > [@mlees](#): > > Some of the required annual training I am required to take (as a contractor working for the US Govt) includes “human trafficking awareness” type stuff. > > That training course (put together by Uncle Sam) is replete with anecdotes of minors forced in to the sex trade. > > Maybe I’m too cynical, but I would not be surprised if some of the mature looking minors ended up in the “just turned 18” style videos. It’s a very real problem, _but at the same time_, the “Human Trafficking Awareness” people, especially those with government sponsorships, tend to see Human Trafficking behind almost every act of sex work. FWIW if a porn website has a live link or contact info for their Section 2257 compliance documents, that should mean age verification has been made at some point in the production. How well that’s \*enforced \*is another story. ---
**Author:** ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2015, 3:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094/122 "2015-02-10T15:16:24Z")
> [@JRDelirious](#): > > FWIW if a porn website has a live link or contact info for their Section 2257 compliance documents, that should mean age verification has been made at some point in the production. How well that’s \*enforced \*is another story. Right, that was an assumption I made while, more or less, speculating on the potential for the misrepresentation of teens’ ages in what is presented as legitimate porn. I have no idea how often these records get audited by the authorities, and how deep do they dig into verifying actors ages, especially if no specific complaints had been filed with that law enforcement office by that point. ---
**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2015, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094/123 "2015-02-10T15:52:39Z")
> [@Guinastasia](#): > > D’oh! > > I’m sorry-I meant it was against the rules! I’m sorry! > > You’re right, it’s not illegal, but prohibited on this board. > > I guess I saw all the “illegals” mentioned above, and typed it without thinking. Nevermind. I am so freaking STUPID!!! > :o Actually, you can post links to porn sites if you spoiler box them and indicate that they are NSFW. The basic idea, as I understand it, is to make having a porn site pop up on your screen be the result of an actual, conscious act of will, rather than an accidental click-through. A fine compromise! There may well be different standards for actual kiddie porn. As for sites that cater to the taste for kiddie porn without revealing any naughty bits or showing sexual acts, my response is EEEEEEWWW! in either case … but I 'm not sure that banning such sites serves a useful purpose. ---
**Author:** ![Cubsfan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f4b2a3/32.png) [@Cubsfan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cubsfan)\ **Post date:** [February 11, 2015, 4:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094/124 "2015-02-11T04:06:28Z")
Hot damn! This thread has 460k+ views! That’s gotta be a record for SDMB ---
**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\ **Post date:** [February 11, 2015, 4:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094/125 "2015-02-11T04:12:13Z")
> [@Cubsfan](#): > > Hot damn! This thread has 460k+ views! That’s gotta be a record for SDMB _Stupid Republican Ideas_ has over 1,800,000 ---
**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\ **Post date:** [February 11, 2015, 4:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094/126 "2015-02-11T04:12:51Z")
> [@Cubsfan](#): > > Hot damn! This thread has 460k+ views! That’s gotta be a record for SDMB Not even close. Just looking at currently active threads, there’s Stupid Republican idea of the day (1800k), Trivia Dominoes: Play Off the Last Bit of Trivia (1400k), Bakers Dozen (1400k), Workplace griping, anyone? (900k), and Free Association (600k). ---
**Author:** ![BlankSlate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blankslate/32/80_2.png) [@BlankSlate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlankSlate)\ **Post date:** [February 11, 2015, 6:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094/127 "2015-02-11T06:35:52Z")
It’s the most viewed thread ever in Great Debates, though. ---
**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\ **Post date:** [February 11, 2015, 8:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094/128 "2015-02-11T20:41:24Z")
> [@madmonk28](#): > > Thirdly, many people have argued that it is not unnatural for a person to be sexually attracted to a teenager. I agree, but in viewing such websites, people are crossing a boundary from fantasy to action. I would argue further that it is not unnatural for an adult to **have sex** with a teenager. There are various reasons not to, but none that warrant making it illegal IMO. ---
**Author:** ![madmonk28](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/madmonk28/32/20811_2.png) [@madmonk28](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/madmonk28)\ **Post date:** [February 11, 2015, 10:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094/129 "2015-02-11T22:14:58Z")
My post you’re responding to is thirteen years old, if you want to bang it, go for it. ---
**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\ **Post date:** [February 12, 2015, 3:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094/130 "2015-02-12T15:17:34Z")
> [@madmonk28](#): > > My post you’re responding to is thirteen years old, if you want to bang it, go for it. _flick_ _puff_ [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-nude-teen-web-sites/99094.md?page=6)