# Non-religious Bible study guide

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [April 1, 2004, 1:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716 "2004-04-01T13:30:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![C3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/c3/32/3108_2.png) [@C3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C3)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2004, 1:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/1 "2004-04-01T13:30:36Z")

</div>

I’m an atheist. I’ve read parts of the Bible before, but I want to tackle the whole thing this summer. Is there a study guide that I could use that discusses the literary, historical, and religious implications of the Bible without being a guide geared specifically towards Christians reading it for their religious study?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astorian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ad7895/32.png) [@astorian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astorian)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2004, 1:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/2 "2004-04-01T13:32:56Z")

</div>

Well, Isaac Asimov was an atheist, too, and he wrote on the Bible (heck, what DIDN’T he write on?).

It’s called “Asimov’s Guide to the Bible.” You’ll learn more here:

[http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/051734582X/qid=1080826328/sr=2-1/ref=sr\_2\_1/002-9735689-7421637](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/051734582X/qid=1080826328/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_1/002-9735689-7421637)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![whiterabbit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/cab0a1/32.png) [@whiterabbit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/whiterabbit)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2004, 2:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/3 "2004-04-01T14:17:34Z")

</div>

Drat, **astorian** , you beat me to it. I haven’t read the book in question, but I’ve heard of it. I probably _should_ read it sometime, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carterba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/85e7bf/32.png) [@carterba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carterba)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2004, 2:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/4 "2004-04-01T14:46:57Z")

</div>

There’s a book called _God: A Biography_ by Jack Miles. He attempts to read the Old Testament (actually the Hebrew Scriptures) as a literary work and describe the character of God. A lot of history is mixed in to explain what a passage would’ve meant to people during the time it was written. Miles is evidently an expert on biblical studies, including history, languages, and religion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Metacom](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ecae2f/32.png) [@Metacom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Metacom)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2004, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/5 "2004-04-01T15:00:49Z")

</div>

> [@C3](#):
>
> I’m an atheist. I’ve read parts of the Bible before, but I want to tackle the whole thing this summer. Is there a study guide that I could use that discusses the literary, historical, and religious implications of the Bible without being a guide geared specifically towards Christians reading it for their religious study?

Depending on how much background info you’re looking for, you might consider just the Oxford Annotated Bible (either RSV or NRSV). It’s a well-respected translation, it has copious footnotes that give historical background, explain possible amiguities in the language, and give alternate translations of certain passages. Each chapter is prefaced with several paragraphs that explain what is known about the authors of the chapter, who the audience was, etc. There are chapters explaining Hebrew poetry, etc. I’ve heard it’s the standard in many seminaries.

Also, tackling the whole bible may be insufferably boring. Keep in mind that the ordering of the books is not chronological. The books of the bible are just that–seperate books that were chosen to be incorporated into a single canon. Also some of them can be flat-out mind-numbing (like the passages that explain all the nuances of Mosaic Law…).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2004, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/6 "2004-04-01T16:45:44Z")

</div>

> [@astorian](#):
>
> Well, Isaac Asimov was an atheist, too, and he wrote on the Bible (heck, what DIDN’T he write on?).
> 
> It’s called “Asimov’s Guide to the Bible.” You’ll learn more here:
> 
> [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/051734582X/qid=1080826328/sr=2-1/ref=sr\_2\_1/002-9735689-7421637](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/051734582X/qid=1080826328/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_1/002-9735689-7421637)

I was disappointed in this. Dr. A was straining so hard to be inoffensive to theists that he provided only the most superficial explanations. More important, it is kind of out of date now, and does not iinclude the latest archeological results. You might want to look at a copy in the library before you buy. It is well written though, hardly surprising given the author.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriendRob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecc23a/32.png) [@FriendRob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriendRob)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2004, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/7 "2004-04-01T17:21:33Z")

</div>

For the New Testament, I’d recommend [Bart Ehrman’s](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0195154622/qid=1080839822/sr=1-4/ref=sr_1_4/102-4482741-4562566?v=glance&s=books) introduction. It’s designed as a textbook for a NT religion course, but it’s very readable and scholarly at the same time (a rare combination).

I don’t know of anything comparable for the OT. You could search online and see what texts are being used for OT courses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2004, 5:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/8 "2004-04-01T17:52:48Z")

</div>

**The Anchor Bible** is extremely well-footnoted, and it gives the information Bible specialists look for. It’s Looooooooong – each “book” of the Bible has at least one, and often several, volumes.

I’ve found the Pelican Bible Guides pretty good, too – I have one for each of the evangelists.

You may have to walkaround a few interpretations, but the above are useful guides for believers or skeptics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![C3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/c3/32/3108_2.png) [@C3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C3)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2004, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/9 "2004-04-01T18:34:07Z")

</div>

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> **The Anchor Bible** is extremely well-footnoted, and it gives the information Bible specialists look for. It’s Looooooooong – each “book” of the Bible has at least one, and often several, volumes.

Okay, that one’s _right_ out.

I think I might start with a used copy of Asimov’s guide and go from there.

Thank you all for your suggestions! Keep 'em coming if you have more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sampiro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/2acd7d/32.png) [@Sampiro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sampiro)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2004, 6:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/10 "2004-04-01T18:36:45Z")

</div>

Some good OT commentaries & good general reading:

[Who Wrote the Bible?](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0060630353/qid=1080843735/sr=8-1/ref=pd_ka_1/002-1109486-0725611?v=glance&s=books&n=507846) and [The Bible with Sources Revealed](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0060530693/ref=pd_sim_books_4/002-1109486-0725611?v=glance&s=books), both by Richard Friedman

[A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0345384563/qid=1080844203/sr=8-1/ref=pd_ka_1/002-1109486-0725611?v=glance&s=books&n=507846) and [A New Interpretation of Genesis](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0345406044/ref=pd_sim_books_2/002-1109486-0725611?v=glance&s=books), both by Karen Armstrong (a former nun turned rabbinical scholar)

[The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology’s New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0684869136/ref=pd_sim_books_4/002-1109486-0725611?v=glance&s=books) by Neil Silberman and Israel Finkelstein (secular deconstruction of biblical anthropology and evidence)

[The Oxford Companion to the Bible](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0195046455/qid=1080844493/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_1/002-1109486-0725611) (separate from the Oxford Study Bible mentioned above) and [The Oxford History of the Biblical World](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0195139372/ref=pd_bxgy_text_1/002-1109486-0725611?v=glance&s=books&st=*), both excellent reference sources (although the first one is quite expensive- most large libraries have it, though)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_du\_Chemin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/e79b87/32.png) [@Peter\_du\_Chemin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_du_Chemin)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2012, 8:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/11 "2012-06-21T08:55:41Z")

</div>

An old thread, I know; but I had to put in a plug for R. Crumb’s tour-de-force, “The Illustrated Book of Genesis”. Aside from the complete text, it also includes an interesting interpretive essay. Crumb has really refined his technique over the years; it’s a beautiful book and an interesting read.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2012, 9:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/12 "2012-06-21T09:22:19Z")

</div>

> [@carterba](#):
>
> There’s a book called _God: A Biography_ by Jack Miles. He attempts to read the Old Testament (actually the Hebrew Scriptures) as a literary work and describe the character of God. A lot of history is mixed in to explain what a passage would’ve meant to people during the time it was written. Miles is evidently an expert on biblical studies, including history, languages, and religion.

He has a second book also CHRIST: A Crisis in the Life of God, that continues the literary biography of a God deciding to take on human flesh & dwell within creaturely limits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quercus\_alba](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quercus_alba/32/4061_2.png) [@Quercus\_alba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quercus_alba)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2012, 1:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/13 "2012-06-22T01:19:26Z")

</div>

The book that David Plotz wrote based on his Slate blogs about reading through the Bible was interesting.  
[http://www.slate.com/articles/news\_and\_politics/blogging\_the\_bible/2009/03/good\_book.html](http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/blogging_the_bible/2009/03/good_book.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Toucanna](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3bc359/32.png) [@Toucanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Toucanna)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2012, 3:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/14 "2012-06-22T03:33:11Z")

</div>

_Who Wrote the Bible?_, by Richard Elliot Friedman, ISBN 0671631616. While not exactly what you’re looking for, is very interesting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2012, 6:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/15 "2012-06-22T06:45:55Z")

</div>

Jonathan Kirsch is a very readable Bible scholar. He hasn’t written a general bible study guide but his stuff is worth checking out. You can pick up a copy of _The Harlot by the Side of the Road_ (one of his first and best works) really cheap on Amazon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Heffalump\_and\_Roo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/heffalump_and_roo/32/7691_2.png) [@Heffalump\_and\_Roo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Heffalump_and_Roo)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2012, 7:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/16 "2012-06-22T07:02:33Z")

</div>

I don’t think this is what you’re looking for specifically, but I’ll offer it up because it’s funny and it’s written by a self-described agnostic.

[The Year of Living Biblically: One Man’s Humble Quest to Follow the Bible as Literally as Possible](http://www.amazon.com/The-Year-Living-Biblically-Literally/dp/0743291476) by A.J Jacobs. Jacobs is the editor at large for Esquire magazine. The book is not chronological or comprehensive, but he does delve into the history of certain subjects and asked questions of people that others might not have access to, when he didn’t understand something. For one year, Jacobs goes through the Bible and literally tries to apply all its concepts to himself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Annie-Xmas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecc23a/32.png) [@Annie-Xmas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Annie-Xmas)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2012, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/17 "2012-06-22T20:22:27Z")

</div>

> [@Quercus\_alba](#):
>
> The book that David Plotz wrote based on his Slate blogs about reading through the Bible was interesting.  
> [http://www.slate.com/articles/news\_and\_politics/blogging\_the\_bible/2009/03/good\_book.html](http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/blogging_the_bible/2009/03/good_book.html)

I came across this tome in a thrift store, and I cannot recommend it highly enough. It only covers the Old Testament, but Plotz gives a brief summary and an excellent commentary on each chapter.

It is a fascinating read.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2012, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/18 "2012-06-22T20:43:28Z")

</div>

> [@Annie-Xmas](#):
>
> I came across this tome in a thrift store, and I cannot recommend it highly enough. It only covers the Old Testament, but Plotz gives a brief summary and an excellent commentary on each chapter.
> 
> It is a fascinating read.

The [articles themselves](http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/blogging_the_bible/2006/09/the_complete_blogging_the_bible.html) aren’t too bad, either, even if they have some broken links.\* Though it is weird that he says he read the “complete Bible,” which implies he assumes his readers to be Jewish, yet constantly refers to comments from Christians, so he knows his audience includes them.

\*Fixed links on index page:  
[Judges](http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/blogging_the_bible/features/2006/the_complete_book_of_judges/why_judges_should_be_bushs_favorite_bible_book.html)  
[Joel, Amos, Obadiah](http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/blogging_the_bible/features/2007/the_complete_books_of_joel_amos_and_obadiah/environmentalists_favorite_bible_book.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Curiosity\_Kills\_Her](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/8c91f0/32.png) [@Curiosity\_Kills\_Her](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Curiosity_Kills_Her)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 4:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/19 "2012-06-23T04:37:24Z")

</div>

I second The Oxford History of the Biblical World.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davidw](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c4cdca/32.png) [@davidw](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/davidw)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2012, 1:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/non-religious-bible-study-guide/237716/20 "2012-06-24T01:30:17Z")

</div>

The Robert Alter translations are pretty dense, but deeply rewarding. If you don’t want to jump directly into one of his translations, try his “The Art of Biblical Narrative.”

> **[An Alter-ed Perspective on the Bible](https://forward.com/news/146729/an-alter-ed-perspective-on-the-bible/)**
>
> As this year marks the 400th anniversary of the King James Version of the Bible, a new English translation might seem a bit late to the game. After all, the KJV is justly celebrated for its eloquence, and the shelves are packed with more recent...
