80 years and several trillion dollars is what places it firmly in the realm of impossible. That’s 20 presidential elections. 40 different congresses. You think the US can focus on a project that long? Even if you ignore the (massive) monetary costs the time required dooms any project.
For comparison we spent only 12 years rebuilding our own country following the Civil War. We spent 7 years rebuilding Japan after we nuked them. There is no way any reconstruction project is going to make it to 80.
As far as Commisar goes, there’s no point to debating him. He’s already claimed that no Communist country has ever existed, or could possibly exist as more than a noble ideal. He maintains there’s an explicit difference between a Marxist-Lenist Socialist State and Communism. I’m mildly suprised he hasn’t brought up the Juche Ideal of Eternal President Kim Il-sung as proof that North Korea isn’t Communist.
kinda halfway and let’s move on now, shall we? That’s what I described. In postwar Germany, the Nazi Party and state were dismantled, but it was not necessarily the case that having been a Party member was a career-ender. I mean, everybody joined to move up, and so on. Just like the Communist Party in the USSR, the fall of which involved no general purge of Communists from public life. But, unlike the Nazi Party, and like the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the Korean Workers’ Party can reasonably expected to survive its fall from power, in some form.
[/QUOTE]
Unlike the DPRK, the USSR was not starving when it fell and in some respects conditions grew worse.
I interpret your reference to “We will de-Communize North Korea the same way the US de-Nazified Germany,” as urging the invasion of North Korea by the United States. Am I wrong?
If I am not wrong, and leaving entirely aside the arguments about the justification and diplomatic repurcussions of such an invasion, I would strongly suggest that you study, compare, and contrast the post-conquest de-Nazification of Germany and the post-conquest de-Baathistification of Iraq.
Well, obviously we were able to so easily de-bathify Iraq because once we rubbled their infrastructure water was very hard to come by and so of course few households had extra to spare for bathing and…
That the Party won’t exist anymore? Nonsense. There will certainly be North Koreans who remain Communist. Or whatever they’re calling it these days. A reunified Korea needs to accept that, or it won’t be a democracy.
You’re so cute. Let’s take a quick look at the side effects of the USSR and China’s rapid industrialization accomplished with little more than “determination and socialism.” Glorious comrade Stalin:
Ahem.
I think you meant “Glorious champion of the Glorious people of the Glorious People’s Republic of China, Mao. You Empire Empire Empire Empire Empire Amerikkans!
… Empire, Glorious!”
Well, after signing a secret non-aggression pact with the Nazis to divide Poland between them, and to have a free hand to take Karelia from Finland, Bessarabia from Rumania, and make Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia disappear completely. Oh, and provide huge amounts of oil and strategic materials to the Nazis while they were at it.
No cite will be forthcoming as it is, of course, patently untrue. It’s just a falsehood based on exaggeration that friend Commissar likes to throw about. The substantial majority of German casualties happened on the Eastern Front, but of course being single handedly defeated by the USSR is entirely untrue, and conveniently ignores their cozying up to the Nazis right up to until being invaded by them.
Notice again the repeated uses of “we” and the USSR being “my own nation” coming from a man who has spent his entire adult life in the United States of America.
Now, while I’m reading every one of your post, I hear Peter Stormare’s crazy Russian character from Armageddon. At least there’s some entertainment in that.
Even if there was never a single soldier of the Western Front, the USSR would have collapsed without massive shipments of war materiel from the Allies, especially the United States.
Not to mention the fact that we had quite a bit of work to do in the Pacific Theater, a war the Soviet Union didn’t join until the atomic bombs were falling.
While I am sure that Wikipedia is an unassailable bastion of truth in no way, shape, or form vulnerable to manipulation for political and propaganda means, I’m going to have to dispute those “undisputed” death number for Stalinist USSR. I’ve looked at the claims, and have yet to find them backed by anything approaching a credible source of any kind. Most of the time, these wild-ass claims simply lead back to Solzhenitsin and his Imperial buddies - hardly an unbiased source. Of course, this has not stopped gullible Imperials from repeating the unsubstantiated claims like a pack of brain-dead parrots.
And are you disputing this in good faith? You really believe that either the Empire of Western Europe had anything to do with trampling the NAZI beast? Even while the prior hid in the shadows until the war was effectively over and the latter spent the war’s duration choking under the heel of said beast? You cannot be serious…
You assume facts too freely, my friend. Pray tell where you’re getting your information from; I think you may want to replace your sources.
Well, that’s certainly news to me. Especially given that our military conflict with the Japanese began on July 29, 1938:
You may or may not be aware that this preceded the Pearl Harbor shenanigans by MORE THAN THREE YEARS:
So, yeah. Way to mangle your history there. :rolleyes:
Commissar, disparaging Wikipedia and then using it in the same post makes it more or less impossible to believe you mean what you are posting. In any case your assertions have almost completely derailed the discussion, and it’s time for that to end. This thread is about North Korea. I can’t declare the subjects of China and the USSR entirely off limits because they can be relevant as historical comparisons, but the debate about Communism vs. capitalism and China and the USSR vs. the world needs to end. Take it to another thread.