b.t.w. Fermat’s last theorem is
x[sup]n[/sup] + y[sup]n[/sup]= z[sup]n[/sup]
has no non zero integer solutions for n>2.
b.t.w. Fermat’s last theorem is
x[sup]n[/sup] + y[sup]n[/sup]= z[sup]n[/sup]
has no non zero integer solutions for n>2.
The Delorean. They only ever made one type of those… unless you count the one in Back to the Future. All the rest of them looked exactly alike; there were no other options.
Lot’s of living things. there is only one panda. Only one duck-billed platypus. Only one ginkgo. The list is endless in this category.
Doesn’t bode well for the longevity of their species, does it?
I was sent into a momentary depression when I realized that no thought I will ever have will be unique. Someone’s thought just about everything.
[A. Whitney Brown]
Just remember: Even if you are a one in a million kind of guy… In a world of 6 billion people, that means there’s 6,000 guys exactly like you.
That’s the big picture.
[/A. Whitney Brown]
Goddamned baboons get to have all the fun…
I say we elect that one President. Jacking off while slagging an opponent? That’s the definition of politics.
I know about Parallel Universes. For one, it’s a THEORY. Secondly, this universe is still unique unless the other ones are like it - which case it’s not much of a parallel universe. Thirdly, there’s still the thing all the parallel universes are part of.
I saw a commercial with a joke like that A. Whitney Brown one: "If you’re a one-in-a-million guy, there’s 1000 people in China just like you.
Hey!?
A. Whitney Brown is unique!
My stone with a hole in it is unique.
The phrase “Hold the newsreader’s nose squarely, waiter, or friendly milk will countermand my trousers.” is unique (thank you Stephen Fry)
The universe is unique.
Seems to me that you have merely softened the definition of unique - we could just as easily go the other way and say that everything object is unique because whatever object we examine, it is the only one in the entire universe that is exactly that object.
(Link that works), and of course I mean ‘every object is unique’, as opposed to the above gibberish.
i thought the OP meant something like not being able to find just ‘coffee’ anymore, but you have mocca, expresso, decaffeinated etc…
Yeah, that’s what I thought as well. Since everything the OP was thinking of have some variety he wanted to know of things that were completely the same. To find something with no uniqueness, if you will.
Tibet. That is a unique place filled with unique people. Heck, no one else has a Dalai Lama and everything that he stands for…