Obama, I Loves Ya, but STFU about DTV

And, at the time I posted this message, there’s still nobody asking for it. Then again, I can imagine the excuses: “Even if we had a converter, we live out in middle-of-nowhere, Kansas/the Lower East Side of Manhattan, and we’d still lose most of our channels because we’re too far from the transmitter/interpath.”

I just think some people don’t like the idea of digital television, period. They want to use their RCA ColorTrak consoles with the decorative bicentennial eagle emblems and non-functional drawer pulls forever.

Do you file tax returns?

Do you claim credits and deductions?

What? Your post essentially consisted of “trust in the great leader, for he is wise and knows things we do not” with the caveat that you might possibly be wrong. Great concession, that one.

Make fun all you want, but leadership is exactly what we need right now.

The problem with almost everything we’re going through boils down to a lack of confidence. It’s a lack of confidence in the system, in the people running the system, in the dollar, in our banks, and in our industries. Banks aren’t lending because they aren’t confident that they’ll be repaid. People aren’t spending because they aren’t confident that they’ll have their jobs much longer. Housing sales have plummeted because people aren’t confident that home values will appreciate.

Because our currency is not standardized by any commodity, ours is a fiat economy. It depends on good faith and credit. When these dry up, the economy stalls, even crashes. Right wing nuts poked fun at Obama’s desire to “spread the wealth around” without understanding the Chicagoan/Austrian nature of his premise — namely, that wealth cannot be created unless money is moving from one person to another. When money is hoarded or held by a cabal, no new wealth can possibly be generated.

All that is required to revive our economy is to get banks to lend, investors to capitalize, companies to hire, and consumers to spend. These are exactly the keys that Obama is targeting with his plans. Pardon me if I fail to excoriate him for his intelligence and insight.

For what it’s worth, I registered the same sort of complaints when people bashed Bush over piddly shit, like how he pronounces “nuclear” or how many fewer minutes he should have spent in the classroom on 9/11 or even, God, someone pitted him for his facial expressions or something. Meanwhile, he was committing war crimes, trampling on our liberties, trashing our international reputation, and neglecting the coercion and deception taking place in the open market. Fuck how he pronounces “nuclear”.

With Obama, same same but different. He is doing almost everything right, in terms of putting people in place and setting things up so that he has the best possible chance of dealing with the shitstorm Bush created. Fuck all the bitching about whom he invites to say a prayer, or what he thinks about DTV. Speaking for myself, he will deserve criticism when fails to do the very best he can or when he phones it all in the way Bush did.

He’s intellectually briliant. He’s morally courageous. He’s a good hearted man who cares about people. He is self-made, having endured hardships and obstacles that only a biracial child of a single mother can know. He values the opinions of others even (and especially) when they disagree with him. He consults people who oppose him along with people who support him. He surrounds himself with giants and legends, and isn’t intimidated by any of them. He is a natural leader whom people are happy to serve.

Every person who opts to join these circus causes and snipe at him, rather than give him support for his excellent ideas, is a traitor to people who are struggling and need a way out of joblessness, homelessness, and hopelessness. So don’t expect much from me in the way of “Wah! Obama made a different decision than I would have made!”

Yes, goddammit, we should trust him. He has earned it.

Seriously. I meant to point this out myself but forgot. Liberal’s position re: Obama is very very strange. Liberal has basically been frothing all over himself about the guy for the longest time, and then in this and another recent GD thread he mentions how often he is critical of Obama, which I’ve never seen any evidence of. Some of his other posts about Obama during the election really had me scratching my head about his (Liberal’s) mental acuity (at least re: Obama).

Maybe your bias has blinded you. Among the flaws I have enumerated, aside from those in this thread, are these:

[ol]
[li]His naivete with regard to the nefarious intentions of others[/li][li]His vulnerabilities to exploitation due to the moral depravity of people in Washington[/li][li]His reliance on the goodwill of wily Congressional leaders[/li][li]His natural kindness and the fragility it exposes[/li][li]The possibility that he might fail altogether due to the pettiness and gluttonous greed of others[/li][/ol]I could go on, but I think that alone is a considerable list.

I pretty much trust Obama to do things well. I feel like I’ve been holding my breath for eight years and with Obama I can exhale and get on with my life. I no no longer obsessively check newspapers for ever-compounding reports of corruption and malfeasance. I agree almost entirely with what you’ve written, and I’m willing to take the condescending jokes when I say Obama will likely be the greatest president of my lifetime.

All of this, however, has fuck all to do with my point. “I might be wrong” is not a criticism of Obama; it is a basic requirement of reason.

[ol][*]His dick is just entirely too large[/ol]

. . . further proving my point.

His greatest weakness is that he just cares too much.

Of course.

Unlike the down-trodden Broomstick, I am not confused about what state/local, SS, and federal taxes actually pay for.

As someone who doesn’t watch TV, and doubts Obama will be watching TV, I think Obama and myself should both STFU about DTV.

“Just in case” my financial situation became so dire I’d have to give up Dish Network. I was unemployed at the time I got the coupons.

Which of course means you are then taking handouts from your fellow citizens in order to reduce your tax liability.

How is filing a tax return “taking handouts from my fellow citizens?”

I don’t understand this at all. A person’s tax liability is what it is. If he/she takes legal deductions then the taxpayer isn’t taking a thing from fellow citizens.

Huh? :confused:

You may fail to realize that TV–especially broadcast TV–is not solely about entertainment. It is also used for educational, news, community affairs, and emergency information purposes. In fact, those are the primary purposes for television.

Again–I’m talking about broadcast TV– certainly not cable or satellite TV, which aside from the “must-carry” rules that require them to offer local broadcast stations in their channel line-up, have no obligation whatsoever to do anything other than program H0tt chIXXX Makingg 0uT!!! 24 hours a day. Broadcast TV, OTOH, is mandated to serve the community needs. It has no raison d’etre beyond that, although licensees can and do program insipid entertainment too).

Just a reminder that EVERY citizen of the United States–not just those who pay taxes–are the sole owners of the broadcast airwaves and as such, are entitled to be able to receive our airwaves without undue burden (for example, being forced to shell out $300 to buy a new digital TV set because of the transition to DTV).

We all decide (through the FCC and other agencies) how we want our airwaves to be utilized. And when we decided (through Congress) to switchover to DTV, we also decided (through Congress) that such a massive, yet beneficial, change in how we receive critical information (news, weather, toxic spill evacuations etc.) should not present an impossibly high financial burden on ourselves, the owners of the United States broadcast frequencies.

Say what? You can receive the airwaves on your own dime. There is no obligation for the rest of us to pay for it.

I feel that way. I only makes sense–financially, even. You see, this whole dealie is really a trade-off–by changing over to DTV we give ourselves more programming with better quality but also lose the ability to use the equipment already in our homes to receive broadcast TV.

Since the switchover greatly increases the value of a broadcast license (which the Citizens, as owners of the airwaves have the right to set the terms of or even revoke) we decided that we’ll go ahead and give the media corporations their fonest wish BUT only so long as no public airwaves owner would be unduly burderned financially by the agreement.

The coupons are the watered-down way to attempt to achieve that. It’s kind of a raw deal though because, IMO, the license holders should have been required to pay for the upgrade–both for the new transmission equipment AND the necessary new receiving equipment (i.e. new digital sets or converter boxes) because they are the ones benefiting most. And it still would have been a sweet deal for them even then because the value of their broadcast holdings is going WAY up. We kind of let them off easy as people are still having to shell out money for the converters and possibly new antennae.

The idea that people are complaining about this is ludicrous. If you’re mad that the Treasury didn’t come out ahead on this (and I don’t know that they didn’t) then complain to Congress and the FCC that they didn’t require the license holders to pay more compensation for their new, glorious windfall. They rent the airwaves from us on OUR terms and at OUR pleasure.