# Obama/layoff spam

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 22, 2008, 7:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023 "2008-11-22T19:51:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 17\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DianaG](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/7ab992/32.png) [@DianaG](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DianaG)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2008, 1:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/21 "2008-11-23T13:46:22Z")

</div>

> [@Zebra](#):
>
> There were ads like this just before the election. Some would say how he was going to hire more people and grow his business but if Obama got elected that he wouldn’t do it because ‘those guys’ don’t know what it’s like to run a small business.

So basically people were threatening to let their own businesses stagnate out of spite?

Has anyone, in the history of, oh I don’t know, EVER actually decided that they don’t want to make more money, because they’ll have to pay taxes on it? Gee, boss… that ginormous raise sure is generous of you, but it’d bump me up a tax bracket, so no thanks! :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2008, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/22 "2008-11-23T17:04:10Z")

</div>

I wonder what will happen when the CFO realizes his wife voted for Obama.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DanBlather](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f4b2a3/32.png) [@DanBlather](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DanBlather)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2008, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/23 "2008-11-23T17:47:28Z")

</div>

> [@DianaG](#):
>
> So basically people were threatening to let their own businesses stagnate out of spite?
> 
> Has anyone, in the history of, oh I don’t know, EVER actually decided that they don’t want to make more money, because they’ll have to pay taxes on it? Gee, boss… that ginormous raise sure is generous of you, but it’d bump me up a tax bracket, so no thanks! :rolleyes:

One of my teachers once said that she got a raise and it decreased her take home pay because “it bumped her into a new tax bracket”. I told my father, the book keeper, and he said it was impossible and explained to me the concept of marginal tax rates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sublight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@Sublight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sublight)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2008, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/24 "2008-11-23T20:00:21Z")

</div>

> [@DianaG](#):
>
> So basically people were threatening to let their own businesses stagnate out of spite?
> 
> Has anyone, in the history of, oh I don’t know, EVER actually decided that they don’t want to make more money, because they’ll have to pay taxes on it? Gee, boss… that ginormous raise sure is generous of you, but it’d bump me up a tax bracket, so no thanks! :rolleyes:

Yep, it seems to be the right’s equivalent to celebrities threatening to move overseas if the other guy gets elected.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rand\_Rover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/db5fbb/32.png) [@Rand\_Rover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rand_Rover)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2008, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/25 "2008-11-23T22:28:50Z")

</div>

> [@DianaG](#):
>
> Has anyone, in the history of, oh I don’t know, EVER actually decided that they don’t want to make more money, because they’ll have to pay taxes on it? Gee, boss… that ginormous raise sure is generous of you, but it’d bump me up a tax bracket, so no thanks! :rolleyes:

Peple with jobs probably do not decide to not make more money. However, people decide all the time to make or not make an investment based on the costs and return. Taxes are one item that decreases the return without decreasing the up-front cost. So, say someone is happy making an investment based on their projection of their profit and the costs and risks involved. If the tax rate on the projected income goes up, then the profit goes down, so they may not make the investment. If that investment is a new plant that would hire 1000 people, then those 1000 jobs are not created, which also hurts the businesses where those 1000 employees would have eaten lunch, etc. and etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2008, 12:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/26 "2008-11-24T00:36:37Z")

</div>

In the [1896 election,](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1896_election) factory owners were telling their workers that if William Jennings Bryan should win, they should not bother coming to work after election day.

McKinley won. As to whether the above tactic actually swayed any votes, who can say?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/27 "2008-11-25T12:45:45Z")

</div>

I’m liking the business plan of “We could potentially have higher taxes in the future so what the hell, might as well start firing random people now. Also, the sky is falling.”

And please note for future reference that “a BIG way” = 8%. Extrapolating from that, I’d place “a HUGE way” at about 15%, “a m\*\*_ **f** _ing ENORMOUS way” at 33%, and “way bigger than my spotty white corporate boss ass” at 74%.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Moto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9de0a6/32.png) [@Mr.Moto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Moto)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 1:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/28 "2008-11-25T13:16:41Z")

</div>

I liked this one better - my BIL quoted it on his website. It was originally written by a Freeper, but is more witty than most of what comes from there:

> [@](#):
>
> I was in a restaurant and my server had on a “Obama 08” tie, I laughed as he had given away his political preference–just imagine the coincidence.
> 
> When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need–the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight.
> 
> I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I’ve decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.
> 
> At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient needed money more.
> 
> I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jack\_Batty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jack_batty/32/3201_2.png) [@Jack\_Batty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jack_Batty)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 1:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/29 "2008-11-25T13:54:42Z")

</div>

That tale has all the ambiance of a Chick track. Did the waiter exclaim “Haw haw” at some point too?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 8:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/30 "2008-11-25T20:54:44Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> In the [1896 election,](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1896_election) factory owners were telling their workers that if William Jennings Bryan should win, they should not bother coming to work after election day.

Was this sort of behaviour one of the reasons for the secret ballot in the U.K.? I remember cartoons from the 1800s of tenants being evicted for not voting the way their landlord wanted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/31 "2008-11-25T21:18:15Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Moto](#):
>
> I liked this one better - my BIL quoted it on his website. It was originally written by a Freeper, but is more witty than most of what comes from there:

Good one… but we need a version where the server stands up on a chair in the dining room and announces that the restaurant is teetering on the edge of bankruptcy because the owner squandered all its profits playing Keno (except for the sizable stipend he awarded himself, which he’s now spending on rum drinks and happy-ending massages in Tahiti) and therefore every patron is now obligated to put several thousand dollars into the tip jar before they’ll be allowed to leave.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/32 "2008-11-25T21:45:05Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Moto](#):
>
> I liked this one better - my BIL quoted it on his website. It was originally written by a Freeper, but is more witty than most of what comes from there:

Translation: Someone wore a tie I didn’t like, and that gave me an excuse to be a cheapskate and act like an ass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Kabong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/el_kabong/32/496_2.png) [@El\_Kabong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Kabong)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/33 "2008-11-25T21:55:35Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Moto](#):
>
> I liked this one better - my BIL quoted it on his website. It was originally written by a Freeper, but is more witty than most of what comes from there:

I don’t get it. If the person in this story was ‘exploring the redistribution of wealth concept’, why didn’t he just go ahead and tip the server? Tipping seems pretty much a textbook definition of ‘redistribution of wealth’.

It might have made more sense if the guy had gone to the owner of the restaurant and said “listen, I’m taking ten bucks off what you say I owe for this meal and giving it to the homeless guy outside…”

Aw, what the hell, the story’s complete bullshit anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BubbaDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bubbadog/32/333_2.png) [@BubbaDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BubbaDog)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 9:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/34 "2008-11-25T21:56:10Z")

</div>

Isn’t the Op’s “letter” just too much urban legend style horshit to get worked up over?

If any real business owner openly announced that his layoffs were politically motivated he might as well dissolve the business before he was sued into bankruptcy.

I can’t even tell if **CA3799** believes in the sentiments expressed in the letter or just wants us to help him develop some counter spam to reply back with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zebra](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/c0e974/32.png) [@Zebra](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zebra)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 10:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/35 "2008-11-25T22:04:11Z")

</div>

There are people, who after getting a raise, no longer quailfy for some sort of benifit, like the state helps pay for health care. The ammount they have to pony to pay their premiums is greater than the raise, but because they pass a line in how much they make, they are ‘penalized’, so they are ‘better off’ by having less pay.

Of course if the benifit didn’t cut off at a point but phased out in a stages that would help.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![j666](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9de0a6/32.png) [@j666](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/j666)\
**Post date:** [November 26, 2008, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/36 "2008-11-26T02:19:16Z")

</div>

> [@DanBlather](#):
>
> One of my teachers once said that she got a raise and it decreased her take home pay because “it bumped her into a new tax bracket”. I told my father, the book keeper, and he said it was impossible and explained to me the concept of marginal tax rates.

Actually, if you get back pay for a delayed review, you _can_ get bumped into a higher bracket for that paycheck. (I don’t know if payroll is supposed to calculate the tax that way, but I’ve seen it happen.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlinkingDuck](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/eada6e/32.png) [@BlinkingDuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlinkingDuck)\
**Post date:** [November 26, 2008, 5:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023/37 "2008-11-26T17:29:35Z")

</div>

> [@DianaG](#):
>
> So basically people were threatening to let their own businesses stagnate out of spite?
> 
> Has anyone, in the history of, oh I don’t know, EVER actually decided that they don’t want to make more money, because they’ll have to pay taxes on it? Gee, boss… that ginormous raise sure is generous of you, but it’d bump me up a tax bracket, so no thanks! :rolleyes:

I once decided not rent a property of mine because the property taxes were so high that the amount I could ask for on the market minus the cost made it seem not worth it…especially since there was risk involved (renter could trash the place etc.).

The fact that the property taxes (triple for rental property) would have been far higher that what I would have made which I THEN would have to pay income taxes on did grate on me…they would make much more than I would for no risk - even if I lost money, they would still get theirs. That concept of unfairness did enter into my decision.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-layoff-spam/474023.md?page=1)
