Yes there are. Per post 22, there are still a lot of people seeking clarification on the badger thing.
[QUOTE=Cervaise]
Yes there are. Per post 22, there are still a lot of people seeking clarification on the badger thing.
[/QUOTE]
Mushroom.
<shrug> I thought everyone knew that.
[QUOTE=Shayna]
Mushroom.
<shrug> I thought everyone knew that.
[/QUOTE]
Snake, snake, oh it’s a snake.
[QUOTE=Dinsdale]
Zorn recommends that Obama sit down with the press for as long as it takes to answer every question about Rezko, after which he can fairly say that he has been as open about it as he can possibly be, and there is nothing to it. Probably unnecessary theater, but as it is, opponents are able to suggest that he has been something short of fully forthcoming.
[/QUOTE]
Well, sounds like Barak tried to clear the air.
To me, it sounds like he - um - could have exhibited better judgment. Which he admits. Of course, in today’s political world, I don’t expect anything to be enough to make something like this completely go away. But at least he can respond by saying he answered all the questions.
Trib had an editorial Sunday essentially along those same lines. Also commented on Clinton’s (and McLain’s) failure to release info such as tax filings. For me, I prefer a candidate who at least acknowledges that they are not flawless, and is open about their less favorable actions.