So, anyway, Obama is a blood-thirsty militarist, except when he’s a Milquetoast wussie quailing in the face of our enemies. The Two Joes, Stalin and Chamberlain.
So often you are wrong about stuff. Perhaps we know more than your funny stories about how foolish we look on the world stage.
What if the CW arsenal is sitting on the dock at Tartus?
Are you making fun of setting up a UNSC protocol to transfer a 1000 tons of chemical weapons into safer hands for destruction. What past events are you asking us to recall.
That was about the time that Putin caved to Obama’s military objective without firing a shot. Terr has been forced to abandon that prediction about the negotiations dragging out past 2016 because Russian/US negotiations were quickly finalized and the weapons are to be destroyed by 2014.
No worries though, Terr is currently pursuing a Rumsfeldism to show why Obama must be seen as a weak fool on his deal with Putin:
"Donald Rumsfeld - Wikiquote. "Simply because you do not have evidence that something exists does not mean that you have evidence that it doesn’t exist. …
You see it is a replay of Iraq with a Syrian twist that no matter how many tons of CW Assad destroys there will always into eternity be those CW that no one can see. The fact that no one sees them is proof that they exist and Obama is a weak fool just like Terr says he is.