Anyone catch Ann Coulter on Larry King last night? Firmly grasping at straws, she accused Obama of ethnic stereotyping by offering to sit down over a beer with Crowley, who’s Irish. “Why not a glass of chablis?”
Right, Ann. Irish people are the only ones who like beer. :rolleyes:
For the purposes of my original post the behaviour of the cops and of Gates himself, who was wrong, who was right, is entirely irrelevant. The point is that the President should not have characterized the actions of the police as stupidity. For all he know civil actions could have arisen from the incident, criminal actions even. The President had no business commenting in public on this at least until he was sure that the incident was a closed book.
I do believe Obama has learned from this (he certainly won’t want a repeat of the shitstorm of bad publicity, especially as his ratings are going south anyway). The words of Presidents have far more weight than those of others; those words should be chosen judiciously.
He is an honest and intelligent man and if you ask him a question he will give you his opinion. I suppose many would prefer he talk political speak. Just talk in circles and say nothing like the Sunday morning pols do. I like him this way.
His only mistake was backing down. He was correct in what he said. The known facts support the characterization that the cops acted “stupidly.” If anything, he was too kind. He could have mentioned that Crowley falsified the police report, but chose not to.
But that is precisely what a President cannot (and should not) always do in public. And not just Presidents but politicians in general. It’s a lesson most of them imbibe with their mother’s milk - weigh your words well, they can have unforeseen consequences.
Especially when one of the people involved in the controversy is a friend.
Especially when you know you don’t have all the facts.
This would be mind-numbingly dumb for any pol. For Obama, given his smarts and savvy, it was beyond that. It also seems that his knee jerked in the same direction as that of Gates. So much for a post-racial President.
I don’t know who the “groupies” are, but the only people who made noise about this are those who hate him anyway. It’s just one more completely manufactured outrage. my only criticism is that he ever makes any effort at all to placate those who cannot be placated.
I think he was hurt by it, otherwise he wouldn’t have softened up his stance. I think that whites are uncomforable with a president that appears to be pro-black which in their minds translates into being anti-white. Stay tuned for the next incident.
Did you just acknowledge that President Obama and Dr. Gates are friends, and then ascribe a racist reason for President Obama’s actions? Because that’s what I’m reading… as if you think they are only friends because they are both black.
Just wonderful. A President that will take a friend’s side even when he is wrong.
Well, your demigod’s subsequent actions and Clintonesque apology lamenting the poor “calibration” of his words indicates that you are at odds with the object of your affection. And didn’t he, when he first commented, indicate that he did NOT have all the facts?
The fact that he heard about the flap and immediately jumped to conclusions and took his friend’s side that racism was at play.
Even as an Obama voter, I think his lips should have stayed still on this subject at the time, or, perhaps just a 'Y’know, I don’t know all the facts, but I’ll check it out and make a comment at a later time". He pulled the trigger on this firestorm and if you think for a second it hasn’t damaged him, just a little, you’re off.
That said, I like the approach to address it, now hopefully he can move on, lesson learned.
Since I’m not the only person who read what you wrote and interpreted it this way (and there really is no other way it can be interpreted), I would say that it is you who is full of fail. Full of something, at any rate.