# Obama will not have a Lewinsky scandal

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-will-not-have-a-lewinsky-scandal/588699>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [July 12, 2011, 1:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-will-not-have-a-lewinsky-scandal/588699 "2011-07-12T01:05:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2012, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-will-not-have-a-lewinsky-scandal/588699/81 "2012-04-16T18:27:54Z")

</div>

> [@Kozmik](#):
>
> Yes, the scandal we’re talking about in this thread is the Secret Service scandal which, again, has nothing to do with the President, only with the Secret Service agents who, unfortunately for them, were involved.

I think everyone is at a total loss as to why you resurrected this thread with that earlier post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2012, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-will-not-have-a-lewinsky-scandal/588699/82 "2012-04-16T18:32:01Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> I think everyone is at a total loss as to why you resurrected this thread with that earlier post.

I’m assuming the Watergate reference was sarcastic - as in Obama’s opponents wish this was the equivalent of Watergate for him when it obviously isn’t and won’t be. Doesn’t have much to do with the original topic, but since **Kozmik** started this thread maybe he sees some other link. Or not. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kozmik](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/8dc957/32.png) [@Kozmik](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kozmik)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-will-not-have-a-lewinsky-scandal/588699/83 "2012-11-13T02:38:18Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> Which makes me wonder why you brought up a hypothetical Lewinsky-type scandal.

Also I [predicted](http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/333199/petraeus-vs-clinton-john-fund)a Lewinsky-type scandal, though not necessarily involving Barack Obama.

Obama will not have a Lewinsky scandal. That doesn’t mean anyone else in the Obama administration won’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scabpicker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/scabpicker/32/8268_2.png) [@scabpicker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scabpicker)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 5:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-will-not-have-a-lewinsky-scandal/588699/84 "2012-11-13T05:41:30Z")

</div>

Wow, that’s a pretty big out you left yourself for that prediction. It effectively translates to: Someone in government will have an affair, and it will cause a problem for them professionally.

If you phrased it that way, you wouldn’t have had much of an argument, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 7:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-will-not-have-a-lewinsky-scandal/588699/85 "2012-11-13T07:43:12Z")

</div>

> [@Kozmik](#):
>
> Also I [predicted](http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/333199/petraeus-vs-clinton-john-fund)a Lewinsky-type scandal, though not necessarily involving Barack Obama.
> 
> Obama will not have a Lewinsky scandal. That doesn’t mean anyone else in the Obama administration won’t.

Obama is in trouble, considering he hand picked Petraeus from the lower ranks and made him CIA director over the screams of the Republicans.

Or not. Remember the Petraeus Betray us thing?

Anyhow, this is just the break the Romney campaign needs!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 9:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-will-not-have-a-lewinsky-scandal/588699/86 "2012-11-13T09:26:50Z")

</div>

As I recall the “Petraeus Betray Us” thing was MoveOn douchebaggery which the Republicans were at great pains to denounce, citing the general’s important service to our country blah blah blah.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tapioca_Dextrin)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 12:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-will-not-have-a-lewinsky-scandal/588699/87 "2012-11-13T12:03:48Z")

</div>

He was servicing our country. One reporter at a time.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obama-will-not-have-a-lewinsky-scandal/588699.md?page=4)
