# Obama's got 9 days to show some guts and save the republic

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [February 23, 2020, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393 "2020-02-23T15:09:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 12:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/41 "2020-02-24T00:24:50Z")

</div>

> [@Declan](#):
>
> Im just a spectator here but from what I can read , I get the impression that the DNC’s plan A is anybody but Sanders, and Plan B is to tank the election and concentrate on holding the line on the house and possibly make gains in the senate.

Holding the line in the House and trying to narrow the gap in the Senate (AND the Statehouses!), _whatever happens with the Presidential race,_ should be the Og-damned rock bottom default baseline expectation of the DNC’s efforts. If it were only their fallback position \*after \*failing to stop Sanders, and they’re viewing “stop Sanders” as Job One in and of itself, then they’d deserve to perish.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 12:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/42 "2020-02-24T00:36:51Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> There’s definitely some stuff in Sanders’s past that none of us can predict how it’ll affect the general. If it starts getting discussed now, we’ll be able to make a better prediction.

Nah; this doesn’t matter. It’ll be “fake news. More lies from Trump. Just Russian propaganda. Fox news always repeats Trump’s lies. The CIA/FBI/NSA said so? Why should I trust them; didn’t you say they made up stuff about Trump and Russia?”

Nothing in Bernie Sanders supposed past will matter to anyone who isn’t already dead-set against him.

The reason Bernie will get the nod isn’t just because Bernie, but because so many people are ready for the Democratic Party to change from the ineffective milquetoast bullshit that it is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 12:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/43 "2020-02-24T00:42:00Z")

</div>

> [@Wesley\_Clark](#):
>
> And if you guys really want Sanders to go away, there is an easy answer.

I don’t want Sanders to go away. I want Trump to go away. And the problem I have with Sanders is I don’t think he can beat Trump.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 12:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/44 "2020-02-24T00:45:11Z")

</div>

Bernie will be a disaster in the general. Not just his past support for dictatorships, or his weird sex stories, or his crazy comments such as saying that bread lines are a good thing, but his current policies.

For example, his promise to ban fracking. I guess Democrats didn’t need Pennsylvania, or Ohio, or Indiana, or Michigan, or…

The Liberals in Canada campaigned on shutting down fossil fuel production in favor of ‘green’ technologies. Guess how many seats the Liberals carried west of Manitoba, and east of Vancouver? ZERO.

On the other hand, the other Democrats currently running have also promised to ban fracking. Which means political suicide is not just a Bernie thing.

Fracking has been the biggest economic improvement to happen to the midwest, and the primary reason why the US’s CO2 emissions are falling. They aren’t giving it up because a 79 year old socialist says they should. And you know Trump will play off this and promise THE BEST FRACKING EVER. More fracking. There will be so much fracking that you’ll be swimming in money! It’s an easy argument for Trump, because banning fracking at this point is beyond stupid.

And then you will have the unions discovering that Bernie is going to take away their gold-plated health care and make them line up with the rubes in a giant government health system. By the way, the waiting list for an MRI in Alberta just hit one year. I’m sure Trump will be more than willing to claim that that’s what’s in store for everyone - including those who have great insurance now.

Democrats are making the mistake of thinking that having a ‘base’ that leans towards socialism is representative of the country. The reality is [Majority of Americans Won’t Vote for a Socialist](https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/398580-poll-majority-of-americans-say-the-would-not-vote-for-a)

> [@](#):
>
> In a new [Hill.TV/HarrisX](http://Hill.TV/HarrisX) American Barometer poll released Tuesday, an overwhelming majority of respondents, 76 percent, said they would not vote for a “socialist” political candidate, while only 24 percent of those polled said they would vote for a socialist candidate.

That’s from a year ago. So you’ve got 24% of the country perhaps. That’s pretty much the liberal wing of the Democratic party, and no one else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 1:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/45 "2020-02-24T01:03:47Z")

</div>

Hey look, everyone! Another post from across the border that claims to understand Americans better than Americans do!

:rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 1:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/46 "2020-02-24T01:05:23Z")

</div>

> [@Wesley\_Clark](#):
>
> Why do you guys always assume that a moderate will outcompete the liberal?
> 
> In the last 5 presidential elections, each time we picked the moderate over the liberal candidate in teh primary, that candidate lost the general.
> 
> Gore beat Bradley in the primary, lost the general. Kerry beat Dean in the primary, lost the general. Clinton beat Sanders in the primary, lost the general.
> 
> Obama wasn’t a liberal, but he was to the left of Clinton. He won both the primary and the general.

I don’t agree with your analysis. I think in most of these examples, you’re stretching the candidates’ positions to make your point. I don’t see any major ideological difference between Gore and Bradley, Kerry and Dean, or Clinton and Obama. These candidates were all moderates. The liberals in these campaigns were people like Brown, Kerrey, Kucinich, Sharpton, and maybe Vilsack. The only case you listed where a moderate beat a liberal was Clinton beating Sanders in 2016.

You’re factually wrong about Gore and Clinton losing the general election. Both of them won the general election (which was part of my point). They lost the Electoral College election. (Kerry may have won the general election also but it’s late in the day to be arguing that point.) This just demonstrates what I’ve already said; we have a system that favors Republicans. They can lose the general election and still win the Electoral College election because their base gets more votes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 1:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/47 "2020-02-24T01:28:55Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_Stone](#):
>
> And then you will have the unions discovering that Bernie is going to take away their gold-plated health care and make them line up with the rubes in a giant government health system. By the way, the waiting list for an MRI in Alberta just hit one year. I’m sure Trump will be more than willing to claim that that’s what’s in store for everyone - including those who have great insurance now.

Oh, you think we have unions. How adorable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 1:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/48 "2020-02-24T01:40:11Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> In my post I pointed out the pattern that’s been established in every presidential election since 1992 and predicted it’s going to happen again. Which is, you know, evidence.

Say what now? You did nothing of the sort.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 1:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/49 "2020-02-24T01:49:57Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_Stone](#):
>
> And then you will have the unions discovering that Bernie is going to take away their gold-plated health care and make them line up with the rubes in a giant government health system. By the way, the waiting list for an MRI in Alberta just hit one year. I’m sure Trump will be more than willing to claim that that’s what’s in store for everyone - including those who have great insurance now.

As a union member, let me tell you: you’re wrong about this. This isn’t a talking point that union members have. To the extent it has been talked about by union members as something to fear, we all know they are shilling for other candidates.

The truth is that unions are built on the concept that we can do better together than we can separately. Union members have and will overwhelmingly support Bernie because he wants the entirety of society to act that way.

And we do too. [Here, I’ll prove it](https://apnews.com/3abf98939ef0390f1b0f14d32c3e84f8):

> [@](#):
>
> Members of Nevada’s most politically powerful labor group were warned by union leaders that Bernie Sanders’ plan would doom their prized health care, but they voted for him anyway.
> 
> The casino workers of the Culinary Workers Union Local 226 are powerful enough in Nevada Democratic politics that special caucus sites are set up in Las Vegas Strip casinos to accommodate them. In at least four of those seven caucus sites Saturday, workers threw their support behind Sanders.

> [@](#):
>
> Angel Lazcano, a 46-year-old busperson at the Aria and a Culinary Union member, didn’t heed the warnings. Lazcano cited Medicare for All as one of the things that drew him to Sanders.
> 
> With Medicare for All, Lazcano said, “everybody can choose their own doctors instead of going through the insurance and taking only the doctors that use the insurance.”

> [@](#):
>
> Nelson Lichtenstein, a labor historian at the University of California Santa Barbara, said that like all other voters, laborers make decisions based on values.
> 
> “Unionists are not green eyeshades accountants who say, ‘How is this going to help me?’” he said
> 
> One of those values is fighting for all working people, said Mark Dimonstein, president of the American Post Workers, which backs Sanders. “Unions are at our best not just for the workers we represent but for the betterment of the working class in general,” he said.
> 
> Dimonstein said his members’ federal health benefits are better than many workers’ plans but there is still dissatisfaction as rising premiums keep cutting into workers’ pay checks. “Postal workers would be far better off with Medicare for All,” he said
> 
> Jody Domineck, a nurse in Las Vegas and executive board member with a local chapter of the Service Employees International Union, said that though many union members enjoy good insurance, it’s something that they have to continually fight for and questioned why employers use as a bargaining chip.
> 
> “Even though we do have good benefits, they are threatened continually. And I feel like if we had an overall plan or some other access, that wouldn’t be a tool that could be used against us.

Union members aren’t stupid and we don’t have the same “ME ME ME” values that conservatives do. “Better for everyone” is gonna be better for us too; that’s what “everyone” means.

This part of your post was particularly ignorant and I felt it should be pointed out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PhillyGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ed655f/32.png) [@PhillyGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PhillyGuy)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 2:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/50 "2020-02-24T02:54:00Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> Union members have and will overwhelmingly support Bernie because he wants the entirety of society to act that way.

I’m in a Pennsylvania union, and have been a little shocked at the people I eventually find listening to Rush or otherwise living in a pro-Trump world.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 2:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/51 "2020-02-24T02:56:02Z")

</div>

> [@dalej42](#):
>
> There’s no doubt Obama keeps his mouth shut publicly, but he can do some behind the scenes work. Would Klobuchar like an Obama appearance in MN? How about Obama’s name on a fundraising email?
> 
> It’s much harder with the damn Billionaires. But, if there’s some really ugly dirt out there, I’d be threatening to see that it gets leaked.
> 
> And it’s time to get all the ugly Bernie shit out NOW!!!

Honestly, it’s not even Obama’s party anymore. It’s Bernie’s party now - that’s what happens when you’re the most popular candidate. It’s Bernie’s party now. Just like it was Mondale’s party in 1984, like Dukakis in 1988, and like McGovern in 1972. He won’t lose as badly as they did because Trump is historically unpopular, but unless the economy craters, I don’t see how he wins.

We need to do what we can to support Bernie, even if we don’t want to - maybe the economy slows, maybe Trump alienates people enough, and maybe we have an impact. We have to defeat Trump or die tryin’ (to steal from 50 cent).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![poweroftheglory](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/919ad9/32.png) [@poweroftheglory](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/poweroftheglory)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 3:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/52 "2020-02-24T03:00:20Z")

</div>

> [@asahi](#):
>
> Honestly, it’s not even Obama’s party anymore. It’s Bernie’s party now - that’s what happens when you’re the most popular candidate. It’s Bernie’s party now. Just like it was Mondale’s party in 1984, like Dukakis in 1988, and like McGovern in 1972. He won’t lose as badly as they did because Trump is historically unpopular, but unless the economy craters, I don’t see how he wins.
> 
> We need to do what we can to support Bernie, even if we don’t want to - maybe the economy slows, maybe Trump alienates people enough, and maybe we have an impact. We have to defeat Trump or die tryin’ (to steal from 50 cent).

He could also be another FDR. We’ll find out in November.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 3:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/53 "2020-02-24T03:04:26Z")

</div>

> [@poweroftheglory](#):
>
> He could also be another FDR. We’ll find out in November.

To your point, I won’t disagree with you and I’d say to dalej and other fellow skeptics: we can bitch about Bernie all we want, but the alternative is clearly worse. Donald Trump is infinitely worse than Bernie Sanders and there’s no debate about it. If Bernie wins, he’s my guy. Period.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 3:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/54 "2020-02-24T03:17:28Z")

</div>

Bernie is the only significant candidate who was born before that Pearl Harbor kerfuffle. He will turn 80 in September of '21.

My mother is 87 and still has a large contingent of her marbles. But 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is brutal on anyone who sits at the Resolute desk. Which is not that big a deal, as long as the second-string president is well chosen. I am hoping Bernie, if nominated, will gracefully submit that choice to the convention, which would be an excellent move, I think.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chisquirrel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6bbea6/32.png) [@Chisquirrel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chisquirrel)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 3:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/55 "2020-02-24T03:56:19Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> “Amazed” is an interesting way to put your reaction to an incorrect paraphrase of something that Sander’s campaign manager said in 2016.

Yeah, because

> [@](#):
>
> Now we can argue about the merits of having superdelegates, but we do have them. And if their role is just to rubber-stamp the pledged-delegate count then they really aren’t needed. They’re supposed to exercise independent judgment about who they think can lead the party forward to victory.

> [@](#):
>
> The arguments that we’re going to muster are going to be based on a series of facts. People will look at different measures: How many votes did you get? How many delegates did you win? How many states did you win? But it’s really about momentum.

> [@](#):
>
> Let’s say you have a horse race to Philadelphia. Over the course of this race, I would like to think that folks who have made a commitment to Hillary Clinton will be saying, ‘Wait a second now, how’s this going to look in November?’ He’s getting first time voters who are young and have a passionate enthusiasm I haven’t seen in politics in years. He’s also tapped into voters who are so disgusted with the process. Then you get the independents. The stakes are so high in November, the superdelegates will feel a special responsibility this time around.

is totally just a single quote that’s taken completely out of context. If you want more quotes where Sanders campaign officers, representatives, and superdelegates make barely veiled arguments that superdelegates should have gone against the will of Democratic primary voters, I’ll be happy to provide those as well. Don’t worry, the breadth of available content is _amazing_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 5:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/56 "2020-02-24T05:49:36Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> In my post I pointed out the pattern that’s been established in every presidential election since 1992 and predicted it’s going to happen again. Which is, you know, evidence.

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Say what now? You did nothing of the sort.

Here:

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> If you gave these people a choice between a nutcase like Trump and a safe candidate like Biden, they’d rush to vote for Biden. And the left wing extremists and the anti-Trump crowd aren’t going to vote for Trump, so they’d grudgingly vote for Biden as well.
> 
> That’s what has worked for the Democrats; pick nice safe moderates like Bill Clinton or Barack Obama (and Al Gore and Hillary Clinton if you go by the popular vote). The moderates vote for them by choice and the left wing says “Ugh. But they’re still better than the Republican.” and unhappily votes for them.
> 
> The Republicans have gone the opposite way. They reject the middle and proudly brag about how extreme they are. And the result? The Republican nominee has lost six of the last seven Presidential elections. The only reason the Republicans have elected a President since the eighties is because they’ve rigged the system.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lord\_Feldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lord_feldon/32/341_2.png) [@Lord\_Feldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Feldon)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 6:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/57 "2020-02-24T06:29:45Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> The burden isn’t on Obama, it’s on the rest of the Democratic fields. You have the moderate lane with Buttigieg, Klobuchar, Bloomberg, and Biden. At least two of them have got to get out of Dodge after Super Tuesday. I’d like it to be Bernie v Biden mano a mano for the second half of the primaries.

The problem with these “moderate lane” takes is that they’re only valid for the candidates; there is no “moderate lane” of **voters**. Most primary voters don’t think of ideology that way, and if the “moderate lane” candidates start to drop out, Bernie is likely to be the main beneficiary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 10:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/58 "2020-02-24T10:16:46Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> Here:

That’s not actual data. It’s fine that you think Biden is a “safe” candidate, but that doesn’t actually mean anything. I think Bernie is a much safer candidate (but this is just IMO). There is no data that tells us which candidate is “safe”, especially not at this point in the election cycle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 11:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/59 "2020-02-24T11:07:43Z")

</div>

The GOP does resort to cheating and lies to win. Kerry would have won in 2004 had the Lie Machine not made the war hero Kerry look like a malingering soldier instead of Bush, who really was a malingerer. Gore might have won in 2000 without partisan cheating in Florida.

**BUT** … [I have a pet peeve] …

> [@](#):
>
> The Republican nominee has lost six of the last seven Presidential elections. The only reason the Republicans have elected a President since the eighties is because they’ve rigged the system.

… the electoral college system favors the GOP but this is not due to any recent “rigging.” I wish people would stop talking about the Ds “winning” elections that they lost. Would they say these things if, by happenstance, the parties were reversed?

Baseball games are decided by which team has the most runs, not the most hits. Nine-ball is won by sinking the nine-ball, not most balls. The Presidency is won by most electoral votes, not most popular votes. Is this hard to remember?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2020, 11:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393/60 "2020-02-24T11:37:55Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> That’s not actual data. It’s fine that you think Biden is a “safe” candidate, but that doesn’t actually mean anything. I think Bernie is a much safer candidate (but this is just IMO). There is no data that tells us which candidate is “safe”, especially not at this point in the election cycle.

There’s also no data that tells is which candidate would be “the best” in the White House either, so I guess there’s no use in speculating about that, now.

I think someone who is as close to Hillary without being Hillary is the safest, and my reasoning is that there only needs to be a tiny difference of votes in a small amount of states, and we have four years of Trump showing us who he really is and four years of demographic shift as a tailwind. The voter rolls have churned by hundreds of thousands of voters dying and entering in the past four years just in the extremely close swing states, which results in a net shift of tens of thousands of people naturally gravitating away from Trump.

It would be another story if the Democrats needed to flip several states by 6 or more digits rather than 5. That might justify plumping on a _relatively_ unknown quantity and hoping the enthusiasm will make up for the red-baiting.

Which isn’t to say Bernie will pretty surely _not_ win: I’d be a fool to not give polls at least _some_ weight. I just find it hard to wrap my head around the possibility that enough new voters will be thinking “wow, I’m really impressed with Trump and would like four more years of the same!” to allow him to keep the swing states unless that is counterbalanced by people who won’t vote for a socialist.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-got-9-days-to-show-some-guts-and-save-the-republic/848393.md?page=4)
