# Obama's memorability among presidents in 100 years time?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [March 25, 2016, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171 "2016-03-25T22:30:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/61 "2016-03-28T22:19:20Z")

</div>

> [@WordMan](#):
>
> Let’s ask this a different way:
> 
> - Will Obama be a President pointed to by later Democrats as a touchstone of their political identity?
> 
> .

That depends on the identity of the party. If Bernie Sanders is the future of the party then Barack Obama will have about as much in common with future Democrats as Andrew Jackson does today. They’ll find a way to honor him, but he won’t be invoked the way Republicans invoke Reagan. For all that Democrats have won 5 of the last 6 Presidential elections(I’m counting 2000), they have yet to elect their Reagan. The last guy to fit that bill was FDR. We’re still in the Reagan Revolution period. Obama wanted to be the guy that changed that, but the country isn’t ready yet and hopefully never will be. Hillary Clinton certainly won’t change that dynamic, so Democrats are still going to be looking for awhile. But once that person is found, Obama will be just a footnote.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 11:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/62 "2016-03-28T23:41:20Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> That depends on the identity of the party. If Bernie Sanders is the future of the party then Barack Obama will have about as much in common with future Democrats as Andrew Jackson does today. They’ll find a way to honor him, but he won’t be invoked the way Republicans invoke Reagan. For all that Democrats have won 5 of the last 6 Presidential elections(I’m counting 2000), they have yet to elect their Reagan. The last guy to fit that bill was FDR. We’re still in the Reagan Revolution period. Obama wanted to be the guy that changed that, but the country isn’t ready yet and hopefully never will be. Hillary Clinton certainly won’t change that dynamic, so Democrats are still going to be looking for awhile. But once that person is found, Obama will be just a footnote.

If the ACA is built upon, and the Iran and Cuba deals pan out, then he’ll easily be the Democratic Reagan. If the Democratic candidate wins in 2016, he may be the Democratic Reagan no matter what – the only Democratic President to lead off 12-plus years of Democrats in the WH since FDR – quite an accomplishment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnGalt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johngalt/32/184_2.png) [@JohnGalt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnGalt)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 1:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/63 "2016-03-29T01:46:50Z")

</div>

He’ll be remembered as the first black president of course, and one with a beautiful wife and good girls (it’ll be interesting to see where THEY end up in the future). I can picture his smiling face on the new $1000 bill, which will buy you a good meal (or maybe a Big Mac) in 2116.

If politics continue going the way they are, he may be remembered as the last “decent” person to hold office, and we’ll look back at his great restraint in the face of the opposition, in that he didn’t give into emotions of hatred and anger. We’re going to say “remember Obama being one cool guy?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 8:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/64 "2016-03-29T08:51:12Z")

</div>

That’s right up there with Carter’s overrated decency. What I will say for Obama is that he has brought dignity to the White House after the last two ridiculous people who inhabited it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Superdude](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/superdude/32/13450_2.png) [@Superdude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Superdude)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 10:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/65 "2016-03-29T10:17:08Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> He was the first black President. You could look it up, he got a Nobel prize for it.
> 
> Of course, in a hundred years there will be other firsts as tribal identity becomes (hopefully) less and less important, and even the signifcance of that will recede. His doubling of the national debt will probably be remembered, God help us.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

Just out of curiosity, are you suggesting that the only reason that Obama won the Nobel Prize was because of his race?

I don’t want to presume to know your mind on this issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 12:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/66 "2016-03-29T12:07:56Z")

</div>

> [@Superdude](#):
>
> Just out of curiosity, are you suggesting that the only reason that Obama won the Nobel Prize was because of his race?
> 
> I don’t want to presume to know your mind on this issue.

Which part of “He was the first black President… he got a Nobel prize for it” was unclear?

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 12:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/67 "2016-03-29T12:32:28Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Which part of “He was the first black President… he got a Nobel prize for it” was unclear?

Glad you seem to have gotten past the fiction that Obama increased the deficit, when he actually massively lowered it from the colossal value from his predecessor’s final budget. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Superdude](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/superdude/32/13450_2.png) [@Superdude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Superdude)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 12:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/68 "2016-03-29T12:33:06Z")

</div>

As I said, I wanted to make sure I wasn’t projecting a context to your comment, so I figured it better to ask.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 12:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/69 "2016-03-29T12:51:33Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Glad you seem to have gotten past the fiction that Obama increased the deficit, when he actually massively lowered it from the colossal value from his predecessor’s final budget. 😉

Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 12:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/70 "2016-03-29T12:53:01Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

I love fortune cookies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 12:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/71 "2016-03-29T12:53:11Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

I’ll take this as the rarest of the rare: **Shodan** admitting that he may have actually made a mistake! Is this the greatest jewel of all?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/72 "2016-03-29T13:19:09Z")

</div>

Feel free to make up whatever you like.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/73 "2016-03-29T13:40:40Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Feel free to make up whatever you like.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

Apologies if I misunderstood – I assume you had checked the ([very easily found](http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/deficit-shrinks-1-trillion-obama-era)) facts again and realized that it’s actually wholly untrue that Obama increased the deficit, since the easily obtainable facts demonstrate that the deficit was [absolutely enormous in Bush’s last budget](http://www.cato.org/blog/dont-blame-obama-bushs-2009-deficit), and decreased significantly in every budget Obama presided over (except for a tiny tic up from '10 to '11), such that it is now much, much lower than it was in Bush’s last budget.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 2:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/74 "2016-03-29T14:23:22Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Feel free to make up whatever you like.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

The only person making things up in this thread is you, since you are apparently continuing to claim that Obama did not reduce the deficit left by Bush. That claim is untrue, both as a percentage of GDP (second from last colum):

> [@](#):
>
> Bush Fiscal Years  
> 2001 18.8 17.6 -0.3 1.5 0.0 1.2 31.4  
> 2002 17.0 18.5 -2.9 1.4 0.0 -1.5 32.6  
> 2003 15.7 19.1 -4.8 1.4 0.0 -3.3 34.5  
> 2004 15.6 19.0 -4.7 1.3 0.0 -3.4 35.5  
> 2005 16.7 19.2 -3.8 1.4 0.0 -2.5 35.6  
> 2006 17.6 19.4 -3.2 1.4 0.0 -1.8 35.3  
> 2007 17.9 19.1 -2.4 1.3 0.0 -1.1 35.2  
> 2008 17.1 20.2 -4.4 1.2 0.0 -3.1 39.3  
> 2009 14.6 24.4 -10.8 0.9 0.0 -9.8 52.3  
> Obama Fiscal Years  
> 2010 14.6 23.4 -9.3 0.5 0.0 -8.7 60.9  
> 2011 15.0 23.4 -8.9 0.4 0.0 -8.5 65.9  
> 2012 15.3 22.1 -7.2 0.4 0.0 -6.8 70.4  
> 2013 16.8 20.9 -4.4 0.3 0.0 -4.1 72.6  
> 2014 17.6 20.4 -3.0 0.2 0.0 -2.8 74.4  
> 2015 18.2 20.7 -2.6 0.1 0.0 -2.5 73.6

… and in absolute terms.

> [@](#):
>
> 2001 1,991.1 1,862.8 -32.4 158.7 -2.0 128.2 3,319.6  
> 2002 1,853.1 2,010.9 -317.4 157.4 -2.3 -157.8 3,540.4  
> 2003 1,782.3 2,159.9 -538.4 161.5 0.7 -377.6 3,913.4  
> 2004 1,880.1 2,292.8 -568.0 160.5 5.2 -412.7 4,295.5  
> 2005 2,153.6 2,472.0 -493.6 179.4 4.1 -318.3 4,592.2  
> 2006 2,406.9 2,655.1 -434.5 188.1 1.8 -248.2 4,829.0  
> 2007 2,568.0 2,728.7 -342.2 182.5 1.1 -160.7 5,035.1  
> 2008 2,524.0 2,982.5 -641.8 178.2 -5.1 -458.6 5,803.1  
> 2009 2,105.0 3,517.7 -1,549.7 134.6 -2.4 -1,412.7 7,544.7  
> 2010 2,162.7 3,457.1 -1,371.4 072.3 -4.7 -1,294.4 9,018.9  
> 2011 2,303.5 3,603.1 -1,366.8 066.4 -0.8 -1,299.6 10,128.2  
> 2012 2,450.0 3,537.0 -1,148.9 059.2 -2.7 -1,087.0 11,281.1  
> 2013 2,775.1 3,454.6 -719.0 041.4 1.9 -679.5 11,982.7  
> 2014 3,021.5 3,506.1 -514.1 032.0 2.5 -484.6 12,779.9  
> 2015 3,249.9 3,688.3 -465.7 025.6 1.7 -438.4 13,116.7

(Second from last column again). These figures come from CBO historical budget data which you can access [here](https://www.cbo.gov/about/products/budget_economic_data#2).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WordMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e8c25b/32.png) [@WordMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WordMan)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 3:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/75 "2016-03-29T15:30:09Z")

</div>

I want to humbly observe that backing-and-forthing about Debt levels is a bit off-topic. It is more detail than is necessary.

The point is: if Obama continues to be a Touchpoint, a President whose record is debated actively like Reagan’s is, then both views regarding Debt will be championed. Democrats will hold him up as a role model, and Conservatives will present their case for how his legacy should be viewed.

If no one cares about Obama, then whichever way the political winds are blowing in general will shape the narrative about him, and his management of the debt will not be actively discussed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blaster\_Master](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/cab0a1/32.png) [@Blaster\_Master](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blaster_Master)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/76 "2016-03-29T15:52:40Z")

</div>

What tends to make a president memorable, at least in the eyes of anyone that isn’t a historian, is whether or not a crisis emerged during his presidency and how it was handled. Would Lincoln be considered one of the greats if he hadn’t been president during the Civil War? To the average citizen, the probably can’t name more a president within 20 years of him in either direction. Looking at Obama’s presidency, without regard for whether his policies are good or bad, there just isn’t anything that anyone will care about a century from now.

Sure, healthcare is something we care about now, but there’s no way it will be meaningful to people in the future. Whatever healthcare is then, there’s no way it is remotely what it is now. The economic crisis might still be remembered, but I also doubt that will have the same kind of memorability that the Great Depression did. After all, how many other economic crises that didn’t occur during one’s lifetime can the average person name? I bet that number is zero.

Unfortunately, I suspect he’ll largely be drowned out by Bush II, starting with his controversial election, being president during 9/11, and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, because that’s the kind of stuff that they will care about in a century. Then again, maybe some of the significance of certain events will look different based upon how they develop under the next couple of presidents. After all, presidents like Buchanan and Hoover are memorable not as much for what they did but what their successors did (though, more in negative lights for them). So, even if he is one of the best or worst administrations we’ve had, it just wasn’t tested in the crucibles that other greats (or terribles) had; he’ll likely, unfortunately, be mostly remembered as the first black president by the average citizen in a century.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2016, 4:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/77 "2016-03-29T16:13:08Z")

</div>

I wouldn’t say that Obama got the Nobel Prize for being black, he got it for not being Bush. But I’d also say that he actually earned the Nobel Prize after having received it. Opening the door to Cuba and reaching the nuclear deal with Iran are both, as Joe Biden would say, big deals. Not getting into new land wars in Asia is also something to admire. Could things have been handled better? Maybe. Maybe it would have been better in the long term to let Assad and Khadafy continue to crack down on their rebels. Maybe we were too quick to pretend that Libya was stable enough to support an embassy. On the whole, his foreign policy has been steady, surehanded, and cautious.

Domestically, he was thwarted at every opportunity by the Republicans. The ACA is certainly better than nothing, but much less than it could have been but for the Republicans’ obstinacy. The recovery has been slow and painful, again aggravated by constant Republican sabotage. His embracing of LGBT rights may have been overdue, but still he’ll be remembered as the first gay-friendly president.

On the whole, I’d say he favors comparably to most any post WW II president.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 11:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/78 "2016-03-30T11:20:36Z")

</div>

He’s earned the Nobel Prize by killing a lot of terrorists. That’s what contributes to peace in the world, not giving despots money, which is pretty much all the Iran and Cuba agreements amount to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 11:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/79 "2016-03-30T11:27:56Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> He’s earned the Nobel Prize by killing a lot of terrorists. That’s what contributes to peace in the world, not giving despots money, which is pretty much all the Iran and Cuba agreements amount to.

Maybe according to Trump, but not according to experts and the real world.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 11:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171/80 "2016-03-30T11:39:23Z")

</div>

When have “the experts” ever said, “Hey, that peace agreement is a bad idea.”

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/obamas-memorability-among-presidents-in-100-years-time/750171.md?page=5)
