Of Infanticide and Abortion

I’m not fond of wars, either.

The problem is that you keep assuming that all the world’s the same. The current population growth in the US (you said you lived there, right?) is .9% and shrinking. And a good chunk of that is immigration. And capitalism cannot sustain negative population growth. Look at Eastern Europe, where there is negative population growth. It’s a mess! Business are leaving, there are labor shortages in some places followed by extreme unemployment…it’s not helping anyone.

I agree that population control is important. But rushing in and killing babies is not the way to solve this. First, we need an economic system that can handle Zero or Negative popluation growth. Meanwhile, we can work on renewable and sustainable practices with population growth. Even if half the population dies out, we still wouldn’t be able to get oil sustainably, for one.

Possibly, but there are ways to handle this without having to slog into the whole abortion/infanticide mess. Heck, just try to get almost every girl to complete high school. All evidence suggests that a significant portion of them will go on to higher education and will delay (or go without) reproducing. Sure, there will still be Duggars and such, but they’re offset by women who wait until their thirties to have one child (or decide not to have children at all) if the society is sufficiently rewarding.

Education is a good solution. But lets quit with the “girls/women” and acknowledge that it takes two to tango. Both genders need good education, and everyone needs to learn to keep their friggin’ pants on. :wink:

I realize that felt good to say in an egalitarian kumbaya-ish sense, but if population control is the issue, it is logical to focus on things that actually affect that issue. By all indications, a drop in the birthrate is triggered by improving status for women. Better-educated men are virtually irrelevant, unless you’re educating them to not be such assholes toward women.

Very true. From everything I’ve read, the key to lower birth rates is by educating women.

ETA: Also in many developing nations, while educating women is key, women and girls have less of an opportunity to be educated–in many situation, the education of boys is favored. So focusing on women is necessary to emphasize because it’s helpful and because many societies overlook girls already.

Heh, and from this thread I was getting the notion that the key was grinding up babies to make much-needed hamburger. :smack:

Well yes, that would be the point of providing better education to men.

Well, no problem has just one solution.

Whew! I guess I can plug the freezer back in, then.

Save some for me! I want the wing!

I read through this whole thread and not one of you mentioned Swift?

ZPG Zealot, your name certainly suits you. Your fanaticism is as extreme as the ultra-environmentalist who believes that to save the planet we should just kill off people. Or the right wing wackos who think the best way to stop the spread of AIDS is to kill gays.

But, why limit your resource wasting to infants. Why not just advocate eugenics for people who are less productive? Mental or physical handicap? Kill ‘em because they will cost extra to care for. Born to someone on welfare? Smother them before they become a burden to society. Stephen Hawking should have been left to die. FDR should never have been made president. You say a child born into salvery should be killed. Then where would we be without Sojourner Truth? And we definitely wouldn’t have Helen Keller jokes today!

Where do you stop? My wife is diabetic and has been on medical disability for 7 years with an open abdominal wound that has not properly healed after almost 40 surgeries. Should she be knocked off because she uses valuable medical resources that a “healthy” person needs so they can continue working and “producing” for society? My son contracted pertussis (whooping cough) because some nitwit believed the crap about vaccines causing autism. As a result he almost died, was hospitalized for a month and is now asthmatic. Should we have just let him choke to death because he required extra assistance?

Who makes the call on a person’s worth, whether it is in the womb, immediately after birth or when the person is 100 years old? Is it you, ZPG Zealot? What gives you the right to make a judgment on the amount of resources a baby uses and what they might give back when they grow up? Personally I would rather have 100 brand new babies with 100 chances for success than 1 miserable person who only looks at the dark side of life.

Let me give you a little background: my wife and I wanted children because we loved each other so much and wanted to share it with our kids. We believed the world was a beautiful place, people were basically good and we wanted to add to society (those weren’t our exact thought processes at the time but ultimately that is what we felt). We talked about how many kids we wanted to have based on our emotional and financial status’ and even talked about adopting a special needs kid when we got older.

After our son was born we had fertility problems. We went to specialists for treatments but wound up having 5 miscarriages, two of them in the second trimester when it still would have been legal to have an abortion without it being considered a “late-term” procedure. We were able to bury those two.

We decided to adopt through the foster care program, finding a kid who needed us. Yes, we told the agency that we would prefer a white child because we were told by the agents that it is much easier to adopt from within your own race through DCFS. We also specified that it be an individual instead of siblings because we were living in a 3 bedroom, 1 bath house and couldn’t handle too much (our foster evaluation confirmed this).

We wound up getting our daughter, a white 8 week old taken from a birth mother who had already lost 4 older kids to the system and had them adopted out by non-family members. I count my blessings that she came into our lives.

Right after we finalized the adoption, my wife got pregnant without medical assistance. We tried everything to save the baby, even a radical procedure called a transabdominal cerclage. We still lost our son, Tommy, at 22 weeks. Too early for even the most extreme care, he lasted a half hour and died in my hands, gasping for breath.

Should I have smothered him to quicken his death? Maybe others could do it but not me. He is my son. I held his tiny body close to me, kept him warm, talked to him, told him I loved him and kissed him goodbye.

I don’t believe in a cult of babies. I believe in life. I believe that it is so precious that we should hang on to it for as long as we can and as hard as we can. From the instant we saw the little heart beating on the ultrasound and heard the swish-swish sound we wanted nothing more than to take our child home to love and raise. I would sacrifice anything for my children. I drive an older car, wear older clothes, brown bag my lunch, my wife cuts my hair all so I can give to my kids. They are not a burden and never could be. Even if, God forbid, they became incapacitated and needed round the clock care and could never be self-sufficient they would not be a burden. They are my children.

Athiests think that we are here because a string of random events culminated in the creation of intelligent life. If that is so, then shouldn’t that be amazing enough to want to preserve it? There is only one Mona Lisa, one Hope Diamond, one Grand Canyon. They need to be protected. And each time an egg and a sperm combine it has the potential to create an individual that has never been seen in the history of the entire universe. Isn’t that worth protecting?

I think, ZPG Zealot, that our differences are greater than how we view the worth of babies. You see the world as a horrible place full of pain and suffering, death and destruction. Killing a baby is an act of mercy. I see a world where people can overcome the hardships and horrors they encounter.

I’m sorry that you look at the world with such anger and pain. I don’t know what got you to this point in life where you can’t see beauty and hope and you need to quantify a person or be so quick to discard them. I hope that you find some help to deal with the hurt you must have inside.

Those 100 new babies will die painfully of dehydration without adults around to take care of them. I’m a very happy person most of the time except when my sexual freedom is threatened by people who want to enslave me because I have a uterus. As you say “each time an egg and sperm combine it has the potential to create an individual that has never been seen in the history of the universe. Isn’t that worth protecting?” There is also the potential that individual will become the worst person to ever exist in the universe or simply an ordinary evil person. To sacrifice the lives of people I know already are good, decent human beings for something that is at best only a maybe, is in my mind utterly stupid and unbelievably cruel It’s looking into the eyes of an already born child and saying, “Sorry, I know you’re a straight A student who never gets into trouble, but we have to let you die of starvation because the next baby might be just as good.” And by the way, I am not an atheist.

Women would be a lot more careful if it were not for abortion or the morning after pill. Actually abortion is down and has been trending that way for the last decade.

If we had not legalized abortion we would probably have the population of a third world country today. It boggles my mind to think what the US would look like today with all the aborted children having been born. All the music that never was created, great art and contributions to science and literature, sports that never were.

Or all the mass murderers, all the drug addicts, all the child molestors, etc. :rolleyes:

:dubious:

This is one of the WORST arguments when it comes to abortion debates. Someone will say, “Well what if good/bad person’s mother had had an abortion?” And the other person will naturally answer, “Ah, but what if bad/good person’s mother had had an abortion?”

(Most people use Mother Teresa and Hitler)

It’s a lose/lose argument. Neither side – pro or con, should ever use it.

Oh my god, listen to yourself! People want to enslave you because you have a uterus? Really? Who?

What are you talking about, here? Who’s going around to elementary schools killing children so that others may be born? Do you really think the world works like this?

Surely you’re aware the population isn’t the problem.

A family of 10 in Indonesia or Nepal, produces very little impact on the environment. The problem is the family of 4 in North America. WhY? It’s about consumption of resources not number of children.

A family in the third world doesn’t need another power plant to power up their fridge, tv, xbox, they aren’t driving SUV’s and producing a couple of tons of garbage each year. Of their 10 children a couple aren’t going to see adulthood. I have an inkling that overpopulation is really the issue this, and the other stupid thread, will turn out to be about.

To say every person you know who is adopted is screwed up is probably just a reflection of them being in exactly the type of backward society you’re advocating for, where they don’t call anyone Mom or Dad, the adoptive parents reveal to everyone their ‘otherness’ by pointing out the lack of blood line, and where all and sundry are privy to their bastardness and uncleanliness.

Also a father cannot claim paternity or seek support unless the birthmother confirms his paternity. All she has to say is," I slept with a dozen men", he can’t force a paternity test. So, y’know, just more nonsense.

And what of all the people, born into dire poverty who go on to make enormous contributions to the world. Children of slavery, war, prostitutes. Should they have been killed, because they were being born into poverty? What utter nonsense.

I call ‘first year philosophy major’, yanking everybody’s chain.

If a man is married to a woman, he is assumed to be the father of any children she has. Child support can be a powerful weapon in a divorce, but no child = no child support.

I am very sorry for your loss, and I wish the best to you and your son and daughter.

Regards,
Shodan

Thank you. Our story is really a major saga worthy of a Lifetime movie of the week or one of those Oprah heart tugging episodes of loss, love and struggling against adversity. I’ve recounted some of the aspects in this and other threads over the years. Usually those stories have a happy ending with a little paragraph right before the credits telling what has happened to the family since everything was resolved. Unfortunately ours is still ongoing (my wife is still dealing with an open abdominal wound left over from the emergency c-section 7 years ago to try and save our son).

In the meantime, my wife has finally agreed with me that she should sit down and start writing her memoirs as a little self-therapy. So far it’s been going well and, with her dark Irish humor, has been pretty funny amongst the pain. She hasn’t gotten to any of the baby stuff yet so that will be a tough chapter for her.