# Official 2018 Midterm Election Contest

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [January 21, 2018, 2:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125 "2018-01-21T14:14:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [July 17, 2018, 2:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/201 "2018-07-17T14:18:19Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Mine was essentially a wild guess (as any prediction that early would be). I feel as okay about it as I could about any wild guess – perhaps I’m slightly more confident than before, but just barely. I won’t be particularly confident of any prediction until late October and I see what Nate Silver says.

I expect to see some convergence in our estimates here once Nate Silver publishes. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [July 17, 2018, 2:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/202 "2018-07-17T14:20:28Z")

</div>

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> I expect to see some convergence in our estimates here once Nate Silver publishes. 😃

Let it be known that I will not be changing my guess. Why? Because I am the laziest person you know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2018, 2:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/203 "2018-07-20T14:52:14Z")

</div>

Speaking of which, [some analysis from 538](https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-some-early-high-quality-polls-can-tell-us-about-the-race-for-the-house/) about House polling. You’ll want to read through it yourself, of course, but I read the bottom line as House races are currently following the generic ballot. Which is bad news for Republicans in districts gerrymandered to be barely in their favor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2018, 6:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/204 "2018-07-29T18:35:46Z")

</div>

I’m afraid it will shatter the prevailing optimism but here are 20 of the closest House races _which the Democrats must win_. (Sorry for the inevitable error(s) in this list.)  
Key: Name of D challenger where known, State-District Incumbent (R/D) % last received by R, status of incumbent if not running (R challenger in parens when different from incumbent) \*-Conor Lamb is incumbent in another district.

?? **Arizona-2** Martha McSally R, running for Senate (??)  
Josh Harder **California-10** Jeff Denham R  
Katie Hill **California-25** Steve Knight R  
Gil Cisneros **California-39** Ed Royce R, retiring (Young Kim)  
Harley Rouda **California-48** Dana Rohrabacher R, 58.3%  
Mike Levin **California-49** Darrell Issa R, retiring (Diane Harkey)  
Jason Crow **Colorado-6** Mike Coffman R  
?? **Florida-26** Carlos Curbelo R  
Abby Finkenauer **Iowa-1** Rod Blum R, 53.7%  
?? **Michigan-11** Dave Trott R, 52.9%  
?? **Minnesota-1** Tim Walz D, running for Gov (??)  
Angie Craig **Minnesota-2** Jason Lewis R  
?? **Minnesota-8** Rick Nolan D, running for Lt.-Gov. (??)  
Tom Malinowski **New Jersey-7** Leonard Lance R, 54.1%  
Antonio Delgado **New York-19** John Faso R, 54.0%  
Anthony Brindisi **New York-22** Claudia Tenney R  
Susan Wild **Pennsylvania-7** Charlie Dent R, resigned (Marty Nothstein)  
Conor Lamb\* **Pennsylvania-17** Keith Rothfus R

The D’s need not win all 20 of these seats to win the House, but they must win an overwhelming majority of them — 15 out of 20 will certainly NOT be enough.  
As shown, 18 of these 20 seats are presently held by an R.

I hope those in the know will keep us informed of D chances in these key elections.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2018, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/205 "2018-08-03T16:53:42Z")

</div>

There’s a gaping ambiguity in the rules.

Will the election results be based on polling results announced by CNN and other news sources in the day(s) immediately after the election? Or will the results be based on election winners finally certified by their states and permitted to take their seats in January of 2019? In the former case I’d guess 220 D’s in the House, but 217 in the latter case. I’ll wait till the rule is clarified before amending my contest submission.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lance\_Turbo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lance_turbo/32/6156_2.png) [@Lance\_Turbo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lance_Turbo)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2018, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/206 "2018-08-03T20:15:46Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> In the former case I’d guess 220 D’s in the House, but 217 in the latter case.

Do you really believe this? What kind of shenanigans do you think are going to happen between election day and early January?

This would be absolutely Earth shattering if it went down like this with control of the house slipping away like that.

Furthermore, I think even one race being miscalled like that is pretty unlikely let alone three. I’m curious to hear why you think this might happen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2018, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/207 "2018-08-03T21:34:12Z")

</div>

> [@Lance\_Turbo](#):
>
> … Furthermore, I think even one race being miscalled like that is pretty unlikely let alone three. I’m curious to hear why you think this might happen.

Note that the contest calls for me to pick a _modal_ value, not an arithmetic mean. If we suppose the GOP will cheat on one seat if and only if they need it to get to 218, then a 217-total for the D’s becomes about twice as likely as, say, 216 or 219.

There are various ways for them to cheat. Most simple would be to claim fraud and that the incumbent must remain seated until a secure election can be re-held, but I think there are other ways. The incentive for R’s to retain House control is huge; for one thing this is the House that will approve census procedures and R’s already plan to subvert its counts for political gain.

I’m not sure why you find Republican mischief unlikely. I recall the apocryphal tale of the frog who didn’t notice the water was boiling hot because it warmed so gradually. The GOP is now openly operated _by_ criminals to serve criminal goals but some Americans haven’t caught on because this developed gradually over decades.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2018, 2:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/208 "2018-08-17T02:36:55Z")

</div>

FWIW [538’s now released House analysis](https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2018-midterm-election-forecast/house/#lite) is pretty much _exactly_ in line with what I said almost 7 months ago (228D with a 54%D i.e. roughly D+8 ) … their “lite” is currently at 228D with a D+7.6, their “classic” is 230D with D+7.6, and their “deluxe” is 226 with the same D+7.6.

So clearly their current prediction is not getting me to move from _my_ current bet 🙂 … anyone wanting to alter theirs based on 538’s take?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2018, 11:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/209 "2018-08-17T11:11:21Z")

</div>

I had 228 and 54% as well…so, no, I won’t change it based on 538. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2018, 11:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/210 "2018-08-17T11:26:55Z")

</div>

Wait… Jonathan Chance’s summaries list you at 56%, not 54%. You were referring just to Nate Silver (and me), then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2018, 11:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/211 "2018-08-17T11:59:37Z")

</div>

My optimistic guess of 241D and 55% is still within the 80% confidence range, so my fingers are still crossed. Of course, it was only a guess.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2018, 2:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/212 "2018-08-17T14:17:59Z")

</div>

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> I’d still like an answer to this. Is this contest more about election results or more about the make up of the new Congress?
> 
> In either case, since we can adjust at any time:  
> House = **257 D** vs **178 R**  
> Senate = **49 D** vs **51 R**  
> Popular Vote = **55% D** vs **45% R**

Time to update my estimate.  
House = **252 D** vs **183 R**  
Senate = **49 D** vs **51 R**  
Popular Vote = **56% D** vs **44% R**

My first estimate looks pretty good, all things considered, but I think I got the scaling between House seats and vote margin slightly off. I’m keeping a similar “blue tsunami” prediction, but fine tuning it to be more self consistent.

> [@septimus](#):
>
> There’s a gaping ambiguity in the rules.
> 
> Will the election results be based on polling results announced by CNN and other news sources in the day(s) immediately after the election? Or will the results be based on election winners finally certified by their states and permitted to take their seats in January of 2019? In the former case I’d guess 220 D’s in the House, but 217 in the latter case. I’ll wait till the rule is clarified before amending my contest submission.

Yes, I noticed that at the beginning. Here was the response:

> [@Jonathan\_Chance](#):
>
> > [@Pleonast](#):
> >
> > I’d still like an answer to this. Is this contest more about election results or more about the make up of the new Congress?
> 
> Strictly election night results. Opportunists, post-election, will not count.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2018, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/213 "2018-08-17T17:22:43Z")

</div>

> [@JKellyMap](#):
>
> Wait… Jonathan Chance’s summaries list you at 56%, not 54%. You were referring just to Nate Silver (and me), then.

Dang if you aren’t right! I misremembered. Still sticking with my current bet (and my early position in case of a tie) but you do get the honor of hitting the 538 number dead on!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2018, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/214 "2018-08-17T19:21:26Z")

</div>

When Silver predicts D+7.6 for the popular vote margin, that means something like (53.0 D; 45.4 R; 1.6 Other), right? Which translates to 53/(53+45.4) = 53.9% for this contest?

223 is pretty close to Silver’s median/mode. I don’t think Silver has posted a clear-cut Senate prediction yet, but one article makes 50-50 look quite likely.

I’m sitting very pretty with my 223/50/53 I think. How do you like my new title? :—  
**septimus  
2018 Midterm Prediction Winner**  
No change to my contest submission, please; but thanks for asking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/i_love_me_vol.i/32/521_2.png) [@I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/I_Love_Me_Vol.I)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2018, 9:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/215 "2018-08-18T09:47:26Z")

</div>

House: D=221  
Senate: D=49  
Total Vote: D-52% R-48%

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigAppleBucky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigapplebucky/32/178_2.png) [@BigAppleBucky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigAppleBucky)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2018, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/216 "2018-08-18T18:32:51Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> Right now is a really tough time to prognosticate, so of course I’ll try it:
> 
> House- 222 D, 213 R  
> Senate: 55 R, 45 D  
> Popular vote: 53% D, 47% R
> 
> Second tie breaker should be whoever posted earlier, since there is more risk the earlier you guess.

I want to wait a while, but if I were making an entry right now, that would be very close. But too many crazy things can happen between now and November. Agree on your second tie breaker.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![USCDiver](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/uscdiver/32/354_2.png) [@USCDiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/USCDiver)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2018, 7:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/217 "2018-08-18T19:32:20Z")

</div>

> [@BigAppleBucky](#):
>
> I want to wait a while, but if I were making an entry right now, that would be very close. But too many crazy things can happen between now and November. Agree on your second tie breaker.

You can change your guess at any time. Earlier post is used as a tiebreaker. No penalty for guessing early.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigAppleBucky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigapplebucky/32/178_2.png) [@BigAppleBucky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigAppleBucky)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2018, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/218 "2018-08-18T20:15:32Z")

</div>

> [@USCDiver](#):
>
> You can change your guess at any time. Earlier post is used as a tiebreaker. No penalty for guessing early.

That’s what I get for not reading closely.

OK  
House  
D 220 R 215  
Senate  
R 53 D 47  
Popular Vote  
D 54% R 46%

You also could have used governorships as a tie breaker.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonathan\_Chance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jonathan_chance/32/701_2.png) [@Jonathan\_Chance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jonathan_Chance)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2018, 1:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/219 "2018-08-27T01:23:10Z")

</div>

Eh, I chose to keep it federal.

So…

Does the recent unpleasantness in the courts, vis-a-vis Trump, cause anyone to rethink their position? Or is it just already built into the brew, so to speak?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2018, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125/220 "2018-08-30T16:16:24Z")

</div>

Which unpleasantness do you speak of? I can’t keep track.

If it’s the illegal North Carolina districts, then you have a decision to make, **Sir Moderator.** Do you wait for the Supreme Court to allocate N.C. seats, but then punt if they split 4-4? Or just go with somebody’s (whose?) best guess on Worrisome Wednesday?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/official-2018-midterm-election-contest/807125.md?page=12)
