# "Oh, crap, Toto, we're still in Kansas!" (anti-gay ammendment)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [April 6, 2005, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085 "2005-04-06T19:54:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/21 "2005-04-07T00:07:30Z")

</div>

> [@Leaper](#):
>
> Worse yet, according to the Washington Times, there’s [increasing support in polls against gay marriage, and for a Constitutional amendment](http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050401-114205-2153r.htm).
> 
> Hrm. 😛

I just can’t fathom it. Why do so many people _care_ who wants to marry whom? If it doesn’t concern them, they should stay out of it.

We’re a nation of fucking busybodies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/22 "2005-04-07T00:07:55Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> I suspect that most of those who voted for this nonsense did not read it.

Before the last election (in which Ohio voters approved a SSM ban), I was driving through Holmes County, which has a huge Amish population. I saw many lawn signs that read “VOTE FOR ISSUE 1 / SAVE OUR SCHOOLS” and “VOTE FOR ISSUE 1 / FOR OUR CHILDREN.” I wonder how many people voted to ban SSM, but thought they were voting for a school levy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Typo\_Negative](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/typo_negative/32/484_2.png) [@Typo\_Negative](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Typo_Negative)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 12:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/23 "2005-04-07T00:08:08Z")

</div>

If they want to defend traditional marriage, why aren’t they going after Britteny Spears and the Hollywood marriage (averaging just over 1.2 years\*)?

[sub]\*fake stat[/sub]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 12:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/24 "2005-04-07T00:29:22Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> I suspect that most of those who voted for this nonsense did not read it. It clearly not only forbids gay marriages, but also foirbids giving umarried people the rights of married people (whether they are gay or straight). So a woman living in an unmarried state with a man can’t be given the same protection as a married woman.
> 
> The knuckle-grazers who drafted this nonsense wanted to use a double-barrelled shotgun to make sure they hit the gays that they are so frightened of, but using such a blunt scatter-gun approach inevitably hurt others that weren’t in their sights.

But why should they care? I mean, after all, these people aren’t MARRIED. They’re living in SIN!!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gobear](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8dc957/32.png) [@gobear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gobear)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/25 "2005-04-07T00:34:19Z")

</div>

I’m really tired of living in Jesusland. I sure hope I can get an exit visa and go back to the United States.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![light\_strand](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/a6a055/32.png) [@light\_strand](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/light_strand)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 12:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/26 "2005-04-07T00:40:03Z")

</div>

**Bricker** Having read the amendment, I think Freidmen is right in his assessment. in his own words

> [@](#):
>
> Friedman said he was “greatly concerned” as to how his decision might affect judicial decisions setting bail and motions for temporary restraining orders in certain domestic violence cases.
> 
> But before announcing his decision, he emphasized that anyone who assumed the ruling was based on any kind of personal, legal or social agenda would be wrong.
> 
> And following the law, Friedman said, can sometimes mean taking a path to some “unfamiliar or even frightening” places.

But we’ll all see whether this holds up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reeder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c6cbf5/32.png) [@Reeder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reeder)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 1:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/27 "2005-04-07T01:23:03Z")

</div>

> [@sishoch](#):
>
> Several gay marriage bans and civil union bans were proposed in the New Mexico state legislature this year. But the session is over and none of them passed.
> 
> A small victory.

NC…one of the reddest of the red states has declined to jump on the bandwagon too.

Not that some here haven’t tried.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 5:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/28 "2005-04-07T05:24:05Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre of Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> We’re a nation of fucking busybodies.

If i can borrow a phrase i heard somewhere recently, these folks want a government just small enough to fit in your bedroom.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mockingbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c68b51/32.png) [@Mockingbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mockingbird)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 5:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/29 "2005-04-07T05:24:11Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre of Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> I just can’t fathom it. Why do so many people _care_ who wants to marry whom? If it doesn’t concern them, they should stay out of it.
> 
> We’re a nation of fucking busybodies.

Becoming?

We’re just going from being Norman Bates nosy to Gladys Kravitz invasive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matt\_mcl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ab992/32.png) [@matt\_mcl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/matt_mcl)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 5:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/30 "2005-04-07T05:40:28Z")

</div>

> [@gobear](#):
>
> I’m really tired of living in Jesusland. I sure hope I can get an exit visa and go back to the United States.

We do not want our children to grow up in such a country. And the captain is so kind, he wants to help… but we have no money…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zabali\_Clawbane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/ecd19e/32.png) [@Zabali\_Clawbane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zabali_Clawbane)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 7:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/31 "2005-04-07T07:07:23Z")

</div>

> [@stpauler](#):
>
> Isn’t Kansas one of the two states that don’t recognize the new sex of a post-op transexual? And as such allows marriage between two people with the same genitalia provided they were both with opposite genitalia?

I’m not sure about that. I do know, that if you are transgendered, and are about to engage in sexual activity with someone (who is of the opposite gender now, but wasn’t always) for the first time you have to inform them of this fact beforehand. Someone in my hometown went to jail for that very thing. ☹ I think this whole series of events stinks, and I cannot wait until these laws are ripped out by the roots as they should be. It makes me angry and sad at the same time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zabali\_Clawbane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/ecd19e/32.png) [@Zabali\_Clawbane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zabali_Clawbane)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 7:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/32 "2005-04-07T07:08:45Z")

</div>

Clarifying: Someone in my hometown went to jail because they didn’t inform their new partner that they had been born male, and were post-op transgendered. The partner found out about it afterwards, and she went to jail. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zabali\_Clawbane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/ecd19e/32.png) [@Zabali\_Clawbane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zabali_Clawbane)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 7:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/33 "2005-04-07T07:16:34Z")

</div>

Again, “born male” as in that is what the official, legal paperwork said. My apologies for any offense I may have unintentionally given. I can only think of the person as a her. Jaded me some when I found out about it too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gobear](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8dc957/32.png) [@gobear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gobear)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 11:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/34 "2005-04-07T11:26:37Z")

</div>

> [@matt\_mcl](#):
>
> We do not want our children to grow up in such a country. And the captain is so kind, he wants to help… but we have no money…

So will Captain Renault keep his promise? Jan is so young; in some ways, I am much older than he.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sublight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@Sublight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sublight)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 11:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/35 "2005-04-07T11:42:00Z")

</div>

> [@Zabali\_Clawbane](#):
>
> Clarifying: Someone in my hometown went to jail because they didn’t inform their new partner that they had been born male, and were post-op transgendered. The partner found out about it afterwards, and she went to jail. ☹

Yeep. In jail, was she kept in male or female population?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earthworm\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f07891/32.png) [@Earthworm\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earthworm_Jim)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 11:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/36 "2005-04-07T11:51:26Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> > [@](#):
> >
> > That the Constitution of the State of Ohio be amended by adopting a section to be designated as Section 11 of Article XV thereof, to read as follows:
> > 
> > Article XV
> > 
> > Section 11. Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state and its political subdivisions. This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage.
> 
> I suspect that most of those who voted for this nonsense did not read it. It clearly not only forbids gay marriages, but also foirbids giving umarried people the rights of married people (whether they are gay or straight). So a woman living in an unmarried state with a man can’t be given the same protection as a married woman.
> 
> The knuckle-grazers who drafted this nonsense wanted to use a double-barrelled shotgun to make sure they hit the gays that they are so frightened of, but using such a blunt scatter-gun approach inevitably hurt others that weren’t in their sights.

I don’t know. Ohio’s a pretty damn fundie state. it wouldn’t surprise me to learn this was the actual intent - to prevent them homos AND them straight people living in sin from having anything approaching a marriage.

Rather than unintended consequences, I suspect they were killing 2 birds with one stone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bienville](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@bienville](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bienville)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 11:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/37 "2005-04-07T11:51:53Z")

</div>

> [@gobear](#):
>
> So will Captain Renault keep his promise? Jan is so young; in some ways, I am much older than he.

You want my advice? Go back to Czechoslovakia.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stpauler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9d8465/32.png) [@stpauler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/stpauler)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 12:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/38 "2005-04-07T12:06:03Z")

</div>

> [@Zabali\_Clawbane](#):
>
> I’m not sure about that. I do know, that if you are transgendered, and are about to engage in sexual activity with someone (who is of the opposite gender now, but wasn’t always) for the first time you have to inform them of this fact beforehand. Someone in my hometown went to jail for that very thing. ☹ I think this whole series of events stinks, and I cannot wait until these laws are ripped out by the roots as they should be. It makes me angry and sad at the same time.

I had to do some digging to find where I originally heard it, here’s the slate article:

> [@](#):
>
> [Paradoxically,](http://slate.msn.com/id/2096495/) it’s the more conservative states that tend to allow such same-sex unions. Courts in Texas and Kansas, for example, have ruled that no operation can alter a person’s sex in the eyes of the law. In the 1999 Texas decision, a state appeals court invalidated the marriage between a deceased man and his male-to-female transsexual widow, after the widow tried to sue her husband’s employer for wrongful death. Gender, the court concluded, is “fixed by our Creator at birth.”
> 
> The unintended consequence of that decision, however, is that a transsexual could marry someone of the same gender in Texas. After all, if a male-to-female transsexual is legally a male in the state, regardless of her surgery and appearance, then she is free to marry another female. In fact, at least two couples have taken advantage of this Texan loophole since the ruling. A 2002 Kansas decision, In re Gardiner, created this same loophole, although it’s unclear whether any couples have made use of it yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ErinPuff](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/dbc845/32.png) [@ErinPuff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ErinPuff)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 12:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/39 "2005-04-07T12:38:35Z")

</div>

> [@Leaper](#):
>
> Worse yet, according to the Washington Times, there’s [increasing support in polls against gay marriage, and for a Constitutional amendment](http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050401-114205-2153r.htm).
> 
> Hrm. 😛

Well, no, it looks like the article is about gay “marriage.”

Those quotation marks piss me off. :mad:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eve](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Eve](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eve)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 1:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085/40 "2005-04-07T13:31:22Z")

</div>

> [@Zabali\_Clawbane](#):
>
> Clarifying: Someone in my hometown went to jail because they didn’t inform their new partner that they had been born male, and were post-op transgendered. The partner found out about it afterwards, and she went to jail. ☹

[Adds to my list of “Reasons I Have Not Dated Since the Coolidge Administration.”]

Yikes—am I supposed to have a Scarlet T emblazoned on me at all times? (I shouldn’t even say that in jest—it will be in the Constitution by next week!)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-crap-toto-were-still-in-kansas-anti-gay-ammendment/298085.md?page=3)
