# Oh god, no!!! Is Romney winning???!!!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [October 19, 2012, 6:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202 "2012-10-19T06:15:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AdanTheSomali](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/7ba0ec/32.png) [@AdanTheSomali](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AdanTheSomali)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 6:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/1 "2012-10-19T06:15:46Z")

</div>

Romney is leading 52 to 45% among likely voters  
WTF, how can Obama lead such a brilliant campaign until all of a sudden one debates propels Romney into a nice lead.  
Ye people of great political understanding, what are the chance of Romney winning? Slim or high?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AdanTheSomali](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/7ba0ec/32.png) [@AdanTheSomali](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AdanTheSomali)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 6:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/2 "2012-10-19T06:19:01Z")

</div>

Sorry, can this be moved to the elections section? In my panic I forgot it existed

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Idle\_Thoughts](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/838e76/32.png) [@Idle\_Thoughts](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Idle_Thoughts)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 6:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/3 "2012-10-19T06:21:10Z")

</div>

Sure thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 6:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/4 "2012-10-19T06:40:41Z")

</div>

There are all manner of polls. 538 and Princeton Election Consortium average them and model election outcomes.

538 estimates that Obama will win 292-246. They peg his odds of winning at 70.4%. Intrade puts his odds at 62.2%.

Princeton Electoral Consortium has been more optimistic for the Democratic incumbant this cycle. But now they have him winning 286-252.

Chill.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 6:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/5 "2012-10-19T06:42:40Z")

</div>

I’d bet Obama wins. But I wouldn’t bet a lot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 7:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/6 "2012-10-19T07:15:18Z")

</div>

You already have.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 9:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/7 "2012-10-19T09:44:58Z")

</div>

> [@Measure\_for\_Measure](#):
>
> 538 estimates that Obama will win 292-246. They peg his odds of winning at 70.4%. Intrade puts his odds at 62.2%.

And [Betfair](http://sports.betfair.com/politics/market?id=1.21311313&origin=LHMA) has Obama at about 68%. There seems to be some convergence. (The Betfair page writes “Login to view the latest prices”, but I _think_ the data’s OK, just maybe a few minutes behind.)

I noticed a sort of innumeracy when chatting with a friend. I said I was worried that Obama might lose; he looked puzzled and said “But you said he had a 68% chance.” I then tried to explain to him that 68% is a far cry from 99%.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 10:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/8 "2012-10-19T10:51:58Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> I noticed a sort of innumeracy when chatting with a friend. I said I was worried that Obama might lose; he looked puzzled and said “But you said he had a 68% chance.” I then tried to explain to him that 68% is a far cry from 99%.

Maybe a bit of Russian Roulette thought experiment would help your friend. Your “32% chance of Romney winning” is like two bullets in a six-shooter.

Perhaps your friend confused “chance of winning” with “popular vote were election held today,” and had come to understand (correctly) that 68% of the latter figure would indeed represent a historic landslide victory for Obama.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 11:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/9 "2012-10-19T11:05:56Z")

</div>

Romney probably isn’t ahead at this point. But he’s come back from behind and it’s neck and neck.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Koxinga](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/4af34b/32.png) [@Koxinga](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Koxinga)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 11:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/10 "2012-10-19T11:34:17Z")

</div>

> [@JKellyMap](#):
>
> Maybe a bit of Russian Roulette thought experiment would help your friend. Your “32% chance of Romney winning” is like two bullets in a six-shooter.
> 
> Perhaps your friend confused “chance of winning” with “popular vote were election held today,” and had come to understand (correctly) that 68% of the latter figure would indeed represent a historic landslide victory for Obama.

In advising you guys to “chill,” I think (e.g.) Measure for Measure above may be subscribing to the same fallacy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fiddle\_Peghead](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fiddle_peghead/32/3506_2.png) [@Fiddle\_Peghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fiddle_Peghead)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2012, 11:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oh-god-no-is-romney-winning/638202/11 "2012-10-19T11:58:50Z")

</div>

> [@AdanTheSomali](#):
>
> Romney is leading 52 to 45% among likely voters  
> …

You’re probably referring to the Gallup Poll. Read [this](http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/18/gallup-vs-the-world/) and it might relieve your anxiety a bit.
