Crucify me if you must, but I’d rather have Elmo be the focus of the show than Telly. Elmo is the lesser of two evils.
For a while there, before Elmo came around, there was a real danger that Telly was going to become the show’s focal Muppet. Telly was (and is) a whiny neurotic mess. So what if Elmo annoys us grownups, at least our kids won’t grow up afraid of their own shadows.
I really miss the Sesame Street of my youth. The show today is so different that it hardly deserves the same title. Back in the day, the idea was that kids (especially lower-income, inner-city kids without a lot of outdoor-play options) watched TV, so they might as well get something out of it. And they found that kids retained (and were entertained) most by commercials, due to their short duration, high production values, and catchy tunes, lyrics, and images. So, the show was designed as a series of commercials. Sure, things went fast, but that’s what kids liked, and that’s how they learned best.
Back then, live segments were split into chunks of a few minutes each, and they were evenly spaced throughout the show, every 10-15 minutes or so, with the commercial-like bits in between. Now, the show starts with a live segment that’s about 20 minutes long, then about 15 minutes of the shorter skits (maybe), and the last 20 are given exclusively to Elmo. I truly believe that they made these changes not to reflect a new philosophy of learning but so that they couldn’t be blamed for ADHD or promoting short attention spans, which, frankly, come naturally to kids. The thing is, I rather think the old approach is better, because somehow they managed to get kids to follow one storyline over the course of a whole hour, which when you think about it is pretty phenomenal.
Oh well. Maybe someday they’ll come out with that “classic Sesame” DVD set. Until then, I still have my memories.
“Do you know what a square is?” “I know WHO a square is!”