# Ok, if I shouldn't \_shoot\_ the intruder, then...?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 19, 2009, 11:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060 "2009-01-19T23:15:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 42

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ivan\_astikov](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/58f4c7/32.png) [@ivan\_astikov](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ivan_astikov)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 3:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/821 "2009-01-24T15:56:11Z")

</div>

> [@BrandonR](#):
>
> **criminals are more concerned about a run-in with an armed homeowner than a police officer**

Why would that even be thought to be true? Police officers with guns are no less likely to kill you than a citizen with a gun, if you are a criminal. And even if they don’t kill you, they can lock your ass in jail.

I take it those forthright and upfront criminals who were asked gave these responses more to diss the police, than by any relation to truth.

This is like believing those surveys where someone asks a schoolboy of a certain age if they have had sex or ‘done drugs’ and expecting honest answers!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enipla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@enipla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enipla)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 4:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/822 "2009-01-24T16:06:41Z")

</div>

> [@ivan\_astikov](#):
>
> You live [here](http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/478845/the_usa_is_the_worlds_most_violent.html), why wouldn’t you already have the minimum of those things, ie. an alarm?
> 
> If after taking the minimum of the security precautions above someone still tries to enter your property, you are then entitled to defend yourself by any means neccessary. Leave your window open and catch someone in there, and you should really **be thanking him for exposing your bad habits.** He could have been an exiled Belgian clown doing a night shift.

Bolding mine. As YOU are a former burglar are you just trying to justify the crimes that you committed?

You can’t possibly be serious that I would be thankful for someone to break into my house. And yes crawling in an open window is B&E.

Your posts are bordering on trolling. I can’t imagine that you are serious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grumman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Grumman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grumman)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/823 "2009-01-24T16:12:09Z")

</div>

> [@ivan\_astikov](#):
>
> Why would that even be thought to be true? Police officers with guns are no less likely to kill you than a citizen with a gun, if you are a criminal. And even if they don’t kill you, they can lock your ass in jail.

Only if the police officer catches you. Unless you’re trying to break into a police station, you are more likely to encounter the person living there than the police officer who arrives 1-30 minutes after someone raises the alarm.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Freudian\_Slit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@Freudian\_Slit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Freudian_Slit)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/824 "2009-01-24T16:16:06Z")

</div>

> [@ivan\_astikov](#):
>
> Yes you do. Tourists are often advised not to flash their valuables about in certain places.

That’s preventative, though. There are precautions that we should all take, but it’s never the victim’s fault.

> [@ivan\_astikov](#):
>
> You do realise that besides those evil nasty cat-raping burglars, there are also what is known as “opportunist thieves” who just nick shit because they can? This means they could have just gone out to steal your lawnmower from your back garden, noticed that the downstairs window was open, and decided to chance their arm. Is that person deserving of a blast from a shotgun, because you failed in your duty to secure your home, and minimise crime?

This makes it seem like you’re blaming the victim. As in, tempting some otherwise good criminal. If you’re that easily induced into crime, it’s your fault–not someone who felt like opening their window. This also sounds so much like the rationalizations that I’ve read rapists give for their crimes–she was asking for it, secretly wanted it, etc.

No one _deserves_ to die for stealing. But if an irate or freaked out homeowner sees a stranger in their house ends up killing said intruder, then it sucks to be the intruder. It happens. And it’s the ultimately the fault of the person entering unlawfully into someone’s home.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ivan\_astikov](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/58f4c7/32.png) [@ivan\_astikov](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ivan_astikov)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/825 "2009-01-24T16:18:21Z")

</div>

> [@enipla](#):
>
> Bolding mine. As YOU are a former burglar are you just trying to justify the crimes that you committed?

I don’t need to justify them; I’ve been punished for them. They are exiled to the past. I am just offering my perspective. Take it, or leave it. It’s only words on a message board.

> [@enipla](#):
>
> You can’t possibly be serious that I would be thankful for someone to break into my house.

Of course not; I was being sarcastic.

> [@enipla](#):
>
> And yes crawling in an open window is B&E.

Here in the UK, I could change your locks and claim squatters rights if I didn’t actually cause any damage.

> [@enipla](#):
>
> Your posts are bordering on trolling. I can’t imagine that you are serious.

Okay, I’ve managed 104 posts without the dreaded troll word coming up! Are you really going to go down that route?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grumman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Grumman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grumman)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 4:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/826 "2009-01-24T16:38:39Z")

</div>

> [@ivan\_astikov](#):
>
> Here in the UK, I could change your locks and claim squatters rights if I didn’t actually cause any damage.

What’s your point? If it’s that UK government is a pack of morons who pass ridiculous laws, I’m _way_ ahead of you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enipla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@enipla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enipla)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/827 "2009-01-24T17:04:57Z")

</div>

> [@ivan astikov](#):
>
> Here in the UK, I could change your locks and claim squatters rights if I didn’t actually cause any damage.

ummm… Bullshit.

I don’t no much about UK laws but the US laws are based on them so I have to call…

Cite?

I know a bit about prescriptive rights. Been there done that.

Or are you being sarcastic again?

I guess I’m starting to understand the criminal mind a little better. “If it’s not nailed down and under constant guard, I can have it.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrandonR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/779978/32.png) [@BrandonR](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrandonR)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/828 "2009-01-24T17:24:07Z")

</div>

> [@ivan\_astikov](#):
>
> Why would that even be thought to be true? Police officers with guns are no less likely to kill you than a citizen with a gun, if you are a criminal. And even if they don’t kill you, they can lock your ass in jail.
> 
> I take it those forthright and upfront criminals who were asked gave these responses more to diss the police, than by any relation to truth.
> 
> This is like believing those surveys where someone asks a schoolboy of a certain age if they have had sex or ‘done drugs’ and expecting honest answers!

Because an encounter with an armed citizen is a.) surprising/unexpected and b.) the citizen isn’t exactly bound by strict requirements and procedures police officers are supposed to follow. In a state with a Castle Doctrine, you can essentially legally kill someone who breaks into your house. The police aren’t supposed to open fire unless they sincerely believe their life is in danger, and by the time they’re called, chances are they’re aware of the situation and what they’re facing.

And I sincerely doubt criminals are lying on the studies in order to “diss the police.” If I were a criminal, what would I be afraid of more whenever breaking into a house: a potentially well-armed homeowner who’s willing to kill any intruder (and whose state law backs them up in doing so), or a police officer who _could_ shoot (but likely won’t, especially on a robbery call) and if you get caught, you go to jail (where a lot of career criminals feel is their “home” anyway). The debate of who you fear more, armed citizens or police, comes down to the punishment you’re likely to receive from coming in contact with them: death or jail. Given the choice, I’d pick jail too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrandonR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/779978/32.png) [@BrandonR](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrandonR)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/829 "2009-01-24T17:26:08Z")

</div>

> [@enipla](#):
>
> Bolding mine. As YOU are a former burglar are you just trying to justify the crimes that you committed?
> 
> You can’t possibly be serious that I would be thankful for someone to break into my house. And yes crawling in an open window is B&E.
> 
> Your posts are bordering on trolling. I can’t imagine that you are serious.

Earlier in this very long discussion, ivan did indeed admit to being a former criminal/burglar. For that reason, it’s not surprising most of his posts blame the victim instead of the perpetrator…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scumpup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce73a5/32.png) [@Scumpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scumpup)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/830 "2009-01-24T17:28:38Z")

</div>

> [@ivan\_astikov](#):
>
> Why would that even be thought to be true? Police officers with guns are no less likely to kill you than a citizen with a gun, if you are a criminal. And even if they don’t kill you, they can lock your ass in jail.
> 
> I take it those forthright and upfront criminals who were asked gave these responses more to diss the police, than by any relation to truth.
> 
> This is like believing those surveys where someone asks a schoolboy of a certain age if they have had sex or ‘done drugs’ and expecting honest answers!

Once again, you presume that you and your cellmates are the totality of criminal knowledge. US criminals have reason to fear getting shot by armed citizens. We shoot more of them than cops do. That doesn’t even include the millions of times criminals flee at the sight of a gun in their victim’s hands.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enipla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@enipla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enipla)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/831 "2009-01-24T17:28:39Z")

</div>

> [@BrandonR](#):
>
> Earlier in this very long discussion, ivan did indeed admit to being a former criminal/burglar. For that reason, it’s not surprising most of his posts blame the victim instead of the perpetrator…

Yep. I saw that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/832 "2009-01-24T17:55:28Z")

</div>

> [@Una\_Persson](#):
>
> You have a better chance of successfully shuffling cards with your buttcheeks than getting gonzomax to produce valid cites for his wild claims.

I settle for being proven correct over and over. Besides that is absolutely not true. I bring shitloads of cites. That is false. You reserve the right to reject any and all claims that refute you. that is dishonest but I expect that now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Huerta88](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/82dd89/32.png) [@Huerta88](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Huerta88)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 6:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/833 "2009-01-24T18:03:34Z")

</div>

> [@ivan\_astikov](#):
>
> Are those till assistants who cost stores more than the shoplifters in losses, sub-human creatures? Just wondering about your delineation.

[mind reading cap on]Though I’ve admitted to finding it hard to follow the, uh, quirky leaps your mind takes, I’m going to have a go at this one: thus spake a former retail shoplifter (you, in my hypothetical) who rationalized his theft by telling himself “the till assistants are stealing more than I ever could, so this is really pretty venial.”[/cap off]

Seriously, because in what other mentality could you think I would be a-okay with till assistants stealing from their employer? In your world is “the Man” okay with till assistants stealing because they are “part of the Establishment?” Does not compute.

And why would it matter “who costs stores more?” Stealing is STEALING. I despise ALL thieves.

Stealing is WRONG.

Stealing HURTS.

Do you understand how much it sucks to have a business, say a small business, die? Somewhere from “a lot,” to devestating.

Knowing that it died partly because of pilferage and theft, which is a huge detriment to many smalll businesses, is even harder to bear, especially when the thieves are those you trusted and paid. Yet you think it’s relevant that shoplifters (in your view) steal less than the staff?

Every new post paints a blacker and more distorted picture of your character. You claim your venality is a thing of the past because you have now done a cynical cost-benefit calculus and stopped housebreaking because it’s no longer worth your trouble. I say it has marked (or is an integral part of) your current character. Tell me, how many forms of benefit are you on? Bogus disability claim? I’m putting good money that your f-everyone-but-me ways have not ended, just shifted their target. Tell me I am wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scumpup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce73a5/32.png) [@Scumpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scumpup)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/834 "2009-01-24T18:48:06Z")

</div>

> [@gonzomax](#):
>
> I settle for being proven correct over and over. Besides that is absolutely not true. I bring shitloads of cites. That is false. You reserve the right to reject any and all claims that refute you. that is dishonest but I expect that now.

Then where are the cites for handguns in colonial America? If you can’t link to the cites themselves for some reason, link to the thread here where you provided them. Like Kalhoun, you regularly turn up in these debates, but it is impossible to take you seriously.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cuckoorex](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ad7895/32.png) [@Cuckoorex](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cuckoorex)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/835 "2009-01-24T19:21:43Z")

</div>

This thread makes me think that someone should develop a MMOFPS called “home invasion” where you choose to be a gun-toting homeowner or a thief with ninja skills. The goal of every thief is to locate and steal the precious TiVo, and the goal of every gun-toting homeowner is to empty a full clip into a thief.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jolly\_Roger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/91b2a8/32.png) [@Jolly\_Roger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jolly_Roger)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 7:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/836 "2009-01-24T19:45:02Z")

</div>

> [@Cuckoorex](#):
>
> This thread makes me think that someone should develop a MMOFPS called “home invasion” where you choose to be a gun-toting homeowner or a thief with ninja skills. The goal of every thief is to locate and steal the precious TiVo, and the goal of every gun-toting homeowner is to empty a full clip into a thief.

But then someone would make a pit thread about how the game promotes violence against home invaders.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cuckoorex](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ad7895/32.png) [@Cuckoorex](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cuckoorex)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 7:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/837 "2009-01-24T19:55:01Z")

</div>

> [@Jolly\_Roger](#):
>
> But then someone would make a pit thread about how the game promotes violence against home invaders.

“Invasion kittens” is the preferred term.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Huerta88](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/82dd89/32.png) [@Huerta88](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Huerta88)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 8:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/838 "2009-01-24T20:44:28Z")

</div>

> [@Cuckoorex](#):
>
> “Invasion kittens” is the preferred term.

And an “invasion kitten” is nothing more than a “buddy kitten” who just couldn’t wait to be invited into your home, er, heart.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cuckoorex](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ad7895/32.png) [@Cuckoorex](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cuckoorex)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 8:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/839 "2009-01-24T20:49:51Z")

</div>

[Here](http://artiewayne.files.wordpress.com/2006/11/kitten-and-gun.jpg) we have graphic evidence of a mean ol’ homeowner perpetrating an atrocity against a cuddly widdle prison kitten.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2009, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060/840 "2009-01-24T20:55:57Z")

</div>

> [@Cuckoorex](#):
>
> This thread makes me think that someone should develop a MMOFPS called “home invasion” where you choose to be a gun-toting homeowner or a thief with ninja skills. The goal of every thief is to locate and steal the precious TiVo, and the goal of every gun-toting homeowner is to empty a full clip into a thief.

With the option of calling 911, which gives a (d20)x3 minute response time for the police. 😛

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060.md?page=41)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-if-i-shouldnt-_shoot_-the-intruder-then/482060.md?page=43)
