OK Let's do this: who thinks social media's recent bannings are first amendment violations?

So, the argument is that Congress threatened to rein in these companies if they didn’t do something on their own, so it really is an act of Congress.

It then goes on to say our founders couldn’t have possibly foretold the growth of this fourth branch of government… Ignoring that the founders were pretty damn aware of the power of the press, and Twitter, etc., is really just a modern version of the press.

It would have been a better argument if they said that our founders were blind to the problems with monopolies. But that wouldn’t fit the style of worshipping our founding fathers.