Hmm, how to put it into words what makes uncut more pleasurable. The extra skin makes for a smoother yet more complex feeling on the thrusting, I guess is the best I can do. I have heard of some women preferring cut for the opposite reason: the solidness and friction, but the women I’ve talked to who’ve had a preference all preferred uncut.
And for whatever reason, being uncircumcised is seen as quite sexy and desirable in the gay community.
I didn’t mean to use inflammatory language when I said that some might view a circumcised penis as looking “mutilated”, but it is distinctly odd if it’s not something you’re used to, much as how Westerners might view the large labrets of some South American indigenous peoples. Like a hand with the last joint of the pinky missing-- probably works just as well, probably wouldn’t be major surgery if done when the fingers were small, but still odd.
As far as penile aesthetics go, I have seen some lovely looking cut ones, and I’ve seen some less-than-attractive uncut ones, but I’ve seen some really nasty looking circumcision scars, skin that was very tight on the shaft due to circumcision (which then means more hair growing on the shaft), the two-toned look-- none of which is appealing, and I can’t shake the feeling that if one were to end up with a less than stunning penis due to quirks of nature, it would be less upsetting than wondering if you might have been better off if mom and dad hadn’t agreed to cosmetic surgery that had unattractive results.
With the cleanliness and disease-resistance issues being magnitudes more minor in the US than they might be in less-developed nations, I can’t help but think that the tiny statistical health boost is canceled out by the risks of circumcision itself. Anyone care to remember the Reimer case?
Since not cutting is now becoming more popular in the US, odds are any kids born today are going to grow up seeing both in the locker room, the social pressure to be one or the other should be easing. In most cases, it probably won’t make a significant difference either way, so erring on the side of not cutting a child’s genitals, then, seems most prudent to me.