# OK to cheat in this circumstance?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [October 4, 2009, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553 "2009-10-04T15:54:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ruby](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/13edae/32.png) [@Ruby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ruby)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2009, 2:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/81 "2009-10-09T02:27:57Z")

</div>

> [@Saintly\_Loser](#):
>
> Well, I didn’t say divorce should be outlawed, did I?
> 
> Still, I didn’t go into marriage with an escape route planned. And as long as I’m married to my wife, I’ll keep my promises.

Lets say, for example, that divorce will suddenly make your ex-spouse an uninsured ward of the state? Would that be holding to your vows?

We can come up with scenarios all day long and never have a good answer for this question. After having been married twice for a total of 27 years, I can tell you that my idea of “forever” has changed as I’ve matured. Forever is a word manufactured by Hallmark as far as I can tell.

It does make me wonder, however, if there is a correlation between those who are strongly biased toward “keeping their vows” and the number of years they have been married.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![furt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/439d5e/32.png) [@furt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/furt)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2009, 3:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/82 "2009-10-09T03:14:50Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> So, you’re getting married next year and you are lecturing those of us married for 30 years on long term commitment?  
> I’ve been lucky, but I know some people for whom divorce was absolutely the right thing to do. But we’re not really talking about divorce here, since I think someone who wants out of a marriage should do it and not cheat until the divorce if final in all but the signing. We’re talking about cheating on a block of wood, basically, when not being married might well cut off care or cause financial hardships to someone. If you were basically brain dead, would you really want your wife to not have a life?

I’m not lecturing anyone about anything. I gave my views on what marital vows meant _to me_, in response to **msmith537** ’s claim that marital vows are “not really a real vow” but only “ridiculous boilerplate” that nobody really takes seriously.

I do not assume other people should follow my moral code; I do get peeved when other people assume that everybody follows theirs.

> [@msmith537](#):
>
> Sounds like you just want trap someone in commiting to be with you no matter how miserable you make them.

Yes, that’s _totally_ it. :rolleyes:

> [@](#):
>
> Probably why I don’t make “vows” to people.

A perfectly fair stance, IMO.

> [@](#):
>
> I say exactly what I will do and how I will do it.

So if/when you get/got married, you leave out all the “boilerplate,” right? Because it’s clear that you _don’t_ in fact mean the bit about “richer and poorer, sickness and health, death do us part.”  
A lot of people – probably most, nowadays – regard marriage as more or less a contract between two autonomous individuals, and one that can be rescinded at any time. I don’t agree, but provided they’re both being upfront about it, I don’t really object. But that is not the only possible approach to marriage. Some of us really do mean every word of the boilerplate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![furt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/439d5e/32.png) [@furt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/furt)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2009, 3:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/83 "2009-10-09T03:18:13Z")

</div>

> [@Ruby](#):
>
> It does make me wonder, however, if there is a correlation between those who are strongly biased toward “keeping their vows” and the number of years they have been married.

It would be just as fair, and equally insulting, to wonder if there’s a correlation between those who are strongly biased against keeping their vows and the number of times they’ve been divorced.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ruby](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/13edae/32.png) [@Ruby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ruby)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2009, 4:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/84 "2009-10-09T04:03:07Z")

</div>

Fair enough…sort of. I’m not “strongly biased against keeping (my) vows”. Making a blanket statement that “I will keep my vows no matter what” is essentially the same as “I will NOT keep my vows no matter what”. Most people don’t go into a marriage intending to break their vows.

I entered into marriage with the intent that it would be forever. I was wrong. Circumstances change, people change, feelings change. Thankfully I’ve never been in the situation of the OP but I know in my heart that if my partner was no longer “in there”, then my marriage would be over. My commitment would remain to tend to my partners needs but the lack of an emotional and physical connection would likely be a deal-breaker for me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2009, 3:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/85 "2009-10-09T15:37:17Z")

</div>

> [@Ruby](#):
>
> It does make me wonder, however, if there is a correlation between those who are strongly biased toward “keeping their vows” and the number of years they have been married.

I don’t know about number of years, but I tend to think that exposure to really awful outcomes tends to change our attitudes toward life. Before we get married, or before anything really bad ever happens to us, we think we’ll behave in picture-perfect ways. Once bad stuff starts happening, we see more shades of grey in everything, and I think we tend to get less certain about whether things are always right or wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saintly\_Loser](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saintly_loser/32/4045_2.png) [@Saintly\_Loser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saintly_Loser)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2009, 2:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/86 "2009-10-10T02:57:24Z")

</div>

> [@Heart\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Will she, though? If there’s \*absolutely \*no chance of her coming out of it? Would that still be your wife, or just her body?
> 
> To me, people “are” their minds and personalities. I don’t believe in souls, but if you do, then that’s essentially what I’m talking about. If I lose a limb in an accident, I may have 20% less body, but I’m still 100% me. Conversely, if my body is intact, but my mind is gone, never to return, then I don’t exist anymore. The body which used to be mine might still be “living”, but nobody’s home. I’m gone.

This isn’t the place for a discussion of what exactly constitutes “brain death” or a vegetative state, but yes, I know those situations would necessitate some difficult decisions.

I do believe in souls, by the way. And also that if the brain is dead, the soul is gone. So, if I were to find myself in that situation, I would have to very carefully assess my wife’s condition. I might need advice from medical professionals, and from people whom I would trust to advise me on ethics. My presumption would be that I’d be bound by my vows until I’m convinced that my wife is no longer living. I would be open to discussion about what exactly “living” means.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saintly\_Loser](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saintly_loser/32/4045_2.png) [@Saintly\_Loser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saintly_Loser)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2009, 3:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/87 "2009-10-10T03:01:09Z")

</div>

> [@Ruby](#):
>
> Lets say, for example, that divorce will suddenly make your ex-spouse an uninsured ward of the state? Would that be holding to your vows?

I’d have a problem with that. Depriving my wife of health insurance? No, don’t think I could do that. “In sickness and in health”? I meant that.

> [@Ruby](#):
>
> We can come up with scenarios all day long and never have a good answer for this question. After having been married twice for a total of 27 years, I can tell you that my idea of “forever” has changed as I’ve matured. Forever is a word manufactured by Hallmark as far as I can tell.
> 
> It does make me wonder, however, if there is a correlation between those who are strongly biased toward “keeping their vows” and the number of years they have been married.

Don’t know. I’m 50 years old, so I’m pretty sure I’ve dropped whatever romantic and silly ideas I had about “love” and “forever” by the wayside.

All I’m saying is that when I, or anyone else, makes a promise, they should keep it. As I said earlier in this thread, I have no problem at all with anyone who knows they can’t or won’t keep such a promise and so doesn’t make it, or who tailors that promise to suit their needs and end up with a promise they can keep.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Markxxx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/5daacb/32.png) [@Markxxx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Markxxx)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 12:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/88 "2009-10-13T00:00:28Z")

</div>

It’s “for better or worse,” I’d say a coma is definately worse.

It’s “until death do us part” not till it becomes terribly inconvenient

Unless of course we rewrite our vows… Let’s try 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mama\_Zappa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/71e660/32.png) [@Mama\_Zappa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mama_Zappa)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 2:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/89 "2009-10-13T02:33:27Z")

</div>

Well, an irrevocable coma sounds like a pretty good approximation of death to me. Hell, when the original wedding vows were first conceived, the medical state of the art was such that a coma like that would have meant death within a very short time. Hence, problem solved, and the spouse could then remarry (or just fool around).

Let it stand for the record: If I’m ever in such a state, I would wish that my spouse remain married to me from a legal standpoint because it gives him the ability to protect the body that has not yet figured out that I’m dead. And, once he’s got things in place to see to my care, may he find whatever friendshop, comfort and hopefully love he can, and never consider it adultery - for at that point, mentally and spiritually, I am already dead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cesario](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecae2f/32.png) [@Cesario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cesario)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 3:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/90 "2009-10-13T03:41:05Z")

</div>

If I’m in a persistent vegitative state, my spouse should have them harvest my organs and move on. Just because I’m still breathing doesn’t mean I’m alive in any spiritually meaningful sense of the word.

It isn’t cheating in my eyes when I’m already dead in every respect except the strict biological definition.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tim-n-va](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tim-n-va/32/3001_2.png) [@tim-n-va](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tim-n-va)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 1:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/91 "2009-10-13T13:03:36Z")

</div>

Violation of the vows? Yes.

Cheating? I’d say that depends on the couple. If my wife tells me that I can have sex with another woman, that is not cheating. If I sneak and do it, it is cheating.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blut\_Aus\_Nord](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Blut\_Aus\_Nord](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blut_Aus_Nord)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2009, 11:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553/92 "2009-10-13T23:04:24Z")

</div>

Say the wife fully recovers from the coma after you’ve already built up a perfectly stable relationship with another woman. Now what?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-to-cheat-in-this-circumstance/512553.md?page=4)
