# on cousins once-removed:

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-cousins-once-removed/583585
**Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports
**Created:** [May 28, 2011, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-cousins-once-removed/583585 "2011-05-28T17:51:54Z")
**Posts on this page:** 7
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![wei\_ji](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e9a140/32.png) [@wei\_ji](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wei_ji)
#### Post date: [May 28, 2011, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-cousins-once-removed/583585/1 "2011-05-28T17:51:54Z")

</div>

“Strictly speaking,” then, if my first cousin’s daughter, Kari, is my first-cousin-once-removed, then what am I to her? Can this term flow both ways, or does it require statement one-way due to ownership of the primary relationship?

–Can Kari say, accurately, that I’m HER “first cousin once-removed?” After all, I’m the one who owns the “first cousin” relationship with her mother: hence the “once-removed” status that descends from it refers to her specifically as the next generation down the line.

–She might state this as: “I’m Wei Ji’s first-cousin-once-removed,” but I don’t see how she could say “Wei Ji is my first-cousin-once-removed,” though linguistic convenience would dictate that she do just that. Usually, I introduce Kari thus: “This is my cousin Kathleen’s daughter, Kari.”

–I wonder how aboriginals in Australia handle this issue, given their notoriously complex relationship awareness?

* * *

LINK TO COLUMN: [What’s the term for your cousin’s children? - The Straight Dope](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/516/whats-the-term-for-your-cousins-children)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![needscoffee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/needscoffee/32/1076_2.png) [@needscoffee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/needscoffee)
#### Post date: [May 28, 2011, 11:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-cousins-once-removed/583585/2 "2011-05-28T23:40:10Z")

</div>

> [@wei\_ji](#):
>
> “Strictly speaking,” then, if my first cousin’s daughter, Kari, is my first-cousin-once-removed, then what am I to her? Can this term flow both ways, or does it require statement one-way due to ownership of the primary relationship?

First cousin once removed, goes both ways.

> [@](#):
>
> –Can Kari say, accurately, that I’m HER “first cousin once-removed?” After all, I’m the one who owns the “first cousin” relationship with her mother: hence the “once-removed” status that descends from it refers to her specifically as the next generation down the line.

Yes.

> [@](#):
>
> –She might state this as: “I’m Wei Ji’s first-cousin-once-removed,” but I don’t see how she could say “Wei Ji is my first-cousin-once-removed,” though linguistic convenience would dictate that she do just that.

Why not? That’s what is is. That’s how I refer to mine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![John\_W.Kennedy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_w.kennedy/32/1031_2.png) [@John\_W.Kennedy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_W.Kennedy)
#### Post date: [May 29, 2011, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-cousins-once-removed/583585/3 "2011-05-29T21:41:55Z")

</div>

Different languages have different rules. In Latin, there are two different words for “father’s brother” and “mother’s brother”. And in English, only a few centuries ago, “cousin” meant only “relative”, and “-in-law” was completely optional. (The 17th-century novel _Love Letters between a Nobleman and his Sister_ is only about adultery.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Powers](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/edb3f5/32.png) [@Powers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Powers)
#### Post date: [May 30, 2011, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-cousins-once-removed/583585/4 "2011-05-30T17:35:59Z")

</div>

> [@wei\_ji](#):
>
> –Can Kari say, accurately, that I’m HER “first cousin once-removed?”

Removal works in both generational directions. Your first cousin’s child and your second cousin’s parent (or your parent’s first cousin) are both your first cousins once-removed. The number of “removes” refers to the absolute value of the difference between your generational numbers.  
Powers &8^]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BrotherCadfael](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@BrotherCadfael](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrotherCadfael)
#### Post date: [May 30, 2011, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-cousins-once-removed/583585/5 "2011-05-30T18:18:46Z")

</div>

I typically call my mother’s first cousins (she has over twenty, down from thirty-one) “Uncle” or “Aunt” as appropriate. It’s not correct, but easier than “Cousin-once-removed”, which is correct.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![wei\_ji](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e9a140/32.png) [@wei\_ji](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wei_ji)
#### Post date: [June 1, 2011, 9:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-cousins-once-removed/583585/6 "2011-06-01T21:53:42Z")

</div>

> [@Powers](#):
>
> Removal works in both generational directions. Your first cousin’s child and your second cousin’s parent (or your parent’s first cousin) are both your first cousins once-removed. The number of “removes” refers to the absolute value of the difference between your generational numbers.  
> Powers &8^]

Ok, that’s interesting. So, my father’s Canadian first cousin would be my own first cousin once removed, just as I am his first cousin once removed (and his children would be my 2nd cousins). It’s a good thing we didn’t add gender to it, like “uncle, nephew and niece.”

I guess I’m just surprised that it seems potentially more complicated than it is in practical use. Thanks for the clarification and comments.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mbh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a6a055/32.png) [@mbh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mbh)
#### Post date: [June 6, 2011, 12:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-cousins-once-removed/583585/7 "2011-06-06T00:59:54Z")

</div>

“Nth cousin” indicates how far back is the nearest common ancestor. The number is the same if you and your cousin are the same number of generations from the ancestor. If you are different generations, the number will be different.

If you and your cousin are different generations, “N times removed” indicates how many generations apart you are.  
Descendants of yourself:  
son  
grandson  
great grandson  
great-great grandson  
etc.

Descendants of your parent:  
sibling  
nephew  
grandnephew  
great grandnephew  
great-great grandnephew  
etc.

Descendants of your grandparent:  
uncle  
first cousin  
first cousin once removed  
first cousin twice removed  
first cousin thrice removed  
etc.

Descendants of your great grandparent:  
granduncle  
2nd cousin once removed  
2nd cousin  
2nd cousin once removed  
2nd cousin twice removed  
etc.

Descendants of your great-great grandparent:  
great granduncle  
3rd cousin twice removed  
3rd cousin once removed  
3rd cousin  
3rd cousin once removed  
3rd cousin twice removed  
etc

The article under “Genealogy” in _Encyclopedia Americana_ has a nice tree diagram that makes this much easier to remember.
