# On Human Existence as Entirely Social

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-human-existence-as-entirely-social/301665>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [April 29, 2005, 3:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-human-existence-as-entirely-social/301665 "2005-04-29T03:14:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spatial\_Rift\_47](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a8b319/32.png) [@Spatial\_Rift\_47](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spatial_Rift_47)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2005, 6:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-human-existence-as-entirely-social/301665/21 "2005-04-30T06:33:57Z")

</div>

The whim of the gestalt is a complicated thing, it varies from person to person depending on the sociological factors surrounding that person’s position in society.

Innovation? Well, I haven’t exactly figured that part out yet. Best way I can say it is to go back to the analogy of the laws of thermodynamics, which while they stop me from decreasing the energy of the universe, don’t stop me from decreasing the entropy of a localized system at the expense of the rest of the universe. So thermodynamics allows a wide range of actions through what is essentially a loophole, even though the impossibility of the straightforward violation remains. Same for social forces.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SentientMeat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/43a26b/32.png) [@SentientMeat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SentientMeat)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2005, 1:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-human-existence-as-entirely-social/301665/22 "2005-04-30T13:04:20Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> is the whole greater than the sum of the parts?

No. There is no such thing as a gestalt: it violates the very conservation laws you appeal to in this thread which, if I may say, seems to consist of mere hot air and unnecessary verbiage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2005, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-human-existence-as-entirely-social/301665/23 "2005-04-30T13:19:30Z")

</div>

No such thing as a gestalt? A bit of a hyperbole methinks.

The functions of cells in my body are enabled and constrained by the function of the whole system. Individual neurons are reacting to a variety of inputs and firing or not based upon those inputs without an individual understanding of the greater whole being processed. So is my functionality enabled and constrained by the function of the societal organism. Pretty basic stuff really.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spatial\_Rift\_47](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a8b319/32.png) [@Spatial\_Rift\_47](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spatial_Rift_47)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2005, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-human-existence-as-entirely-social/301665/24 "2005-04-30T17:05:30Z")

</div>

The conservation laws I appeal to? Are you talking about the laws of thermodynamics, which I have been using as a mere analogy? How on Earth do you see thermodynamics contradicting the idea of a social gestalt? **DSeid** has the right idea.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2005, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-human-existence-as-entirely-social/301665/25 "2005-04-30T22:45:44Z")

</div>

> [@Spatial Rift 47](#):
>
> Innovation? Well, I haven’t exactly figured that part out yet. Best way I can say it is to go back to the analogy of the laws of thermodynamics, which while they stop me from decreasing the energy of the universe, don’t stop me from decreasing the entropy of a localized system at the expense of the rest of the universe. So thermodynamics allows a wide range of actions through what is essentially a loophole, even though the impossibility of the straightforward violation remains. Same for social forces.

I think that’s pretty easily debunked, unless you’re going to claim that the sum of all innovative thought in society has remained constant throughout the whole of Earth’s history.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-human-existence-as-entirely-social/301665.md?page=1)
