# On Music Theory

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Tags:** music\
**Created:** [May 6, 2023, 3:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652 "2023-05-06T03:14:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Pearse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/richard_pearse/32/13144_2.png) [@Richard\_Pearse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Pearse)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2023, 10:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/21 "2023-06-08T22:56:33Z")

</div>

Yes but without the D so it would be 20x212, and that’s why it’s not a D7. If you were to add another note it would be D#, so 201212, pretty awkward for the fingers.

But your observation brings up a natural sounding way to use a dim chord. You can turn a D7 into a D#dim just by walking the root note up half a step, then you can walk the root up another half step to E and play an Eminor. I think Pink Floyd do that somewhere in Dark Side of the Moon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![74westy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/74westy/32/3950_2.png) [@74westy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/74westy)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2023, 10:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/22 "2023-06-08T22:59:40Z")

</div>

> [@Richard\_Pearse](#):
>
> pretty awkward for the fingers.

That’s why God gave us thumbs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Pearse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/richard_pearse/32/13144_2.png) [@Richard\_Pearse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Pearse)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2023, 11:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/23 "2023-06-08T23:00:04Z")

</div>

That’s why God gave Hendrix thumbs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2023, 2:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/24 "2023-06-09T02:39:06Z")

</div>

> [@Richard\_Pearse](#):
>
> It tends to want to be resolved to something else (to my ears at least) so you wouldn’t normally linger on it for long, not in rock music at least

Yeah, it’s the top three notes of a V7 chord, so it wants to strongly resolve to a I (in the OP’s case, the F# wants to move to G and the C to B, the same movement as in the V7 chord, D7).

I personally don’t see vii chords much at all in popular music.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![outlierrn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/outlierrn/32/3005_2.png) [@outlierrn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/outlierrn)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2023, 7:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/25 "2023-06-09T07:37:36Z")

</div>

One way of thinking about the 7th chord is that it has a tritone interval between the 3rd and the 7th notes. In G major the V7 chord is D7 (DF#AC), thus the F# to C is a tritone (diminished 5th). That’s why neither the Dm7 (FC), or the Dmaj7 (F#C#) have as much need-to-resolve as the D7.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2023, 9:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/26 "2023-06-09T09:06:35Z")

</div>

> [@pulykamell](#):
>
> I personally don’t see vii chords much at all in popular music. ⁢

You’re more likely to see a flat VII major chord. It’s so commonly used that it’s like an honorary member of the major key.

The main place for the diminished seven chords in pop music is when it goes jazzy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alovem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b38774/32.png) [@alovem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alovem)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2023, 11:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/27 "2023-06-09T11:03:55Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> …flat VII major chord.

What do you mean by that? In the key of G, would that be an F major chord, or do you mean something else?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2023, 11:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/28 "2023-06-09T11:15:11Z")

</div>

Yes. All over pop music.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2023, 11:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/29 "2023-06-09T11:31:18Z")

</div>

I believe the traditional analysis would be that it’s borrowed from the parallel minor. You can also say that it’s a IV of IV, especially if the progression goes bVII, IV, I. (In other words, in C, the progression Bb-F-C, Bb to F is a IV-I movement if F is the tonic. Since F is the IV of C, the Bb can be thought of as the IV of IV.) You can also look at it as modal interchange with the bVII being borrowed from the mixolydian.

Traditional theory is not always very clean trying to analyze popular music. When it returns immediately to the I, I kind of just think of it as as a very soft cadence. So like if V7-I is a strong, “perfect cadence” and IV-I is a weaker “plagal cadence”, bVII-I is a softer version of that to me.

When the bVII is followed by IV, then it just feels like a IV-I to me centered on the IV chord.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alovem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b38774/32.png) [@alovem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alovem)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2023, 3:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/30 "2023-06-09T15:18:17Z")

</div>

Good analysis. That exact move appears in Davey Graham’s “Lashtal’s Room,” and it sounds as described. The fourth of the fourth before returning to the tonic, without much fuss or harmonic tension.

Here it is at 0:50-0:51:

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/vkNfEGF60qE/maxresdefault.jpg "Lashtal's Room") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkNfEGF60qE)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alovem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b38774/32.png) [@alovem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alovem)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2023, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/31 "2023-06-09T15:29:17Z")

</div>

Posting again to avoid messing up the imbedded video with an edit:

I’ve just checked on the guitar to be sure, and it actually happens twice in that part of the tune. Just before the part I indicated, it’s in G, with the cadence F-C-G. The part I indicated is in C, with the cadence Bb-F-C.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alovem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b38774/32.png) [@alovem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alovem)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2023, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652/32 "2023-06-09T15:52:21Z")

</div>

Argh…timeout. “_Embedded_.” Last post.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-music-theory/983652.md?page=1)
