# On profanity against non-posters \[\[edited thread title\]\]

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-profanity-against-non-posters-edited-thread-title/540739>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [May 25, 2010, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-profanity-against-non-posters-edited-thread-title/540739 "2010-05-25T19:58:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 36

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gfactor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de053/32.png) [@Gfactor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gfactor)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2010, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-profanity-against-non-posters-edited-thread-title/540739/36 "2010-05-26T21:19:45Z")

</div>

> [@MTCicero](#):
>
> I’ll ask, too. Is [this](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=12501829&postcount=89) all right? No?

This is the post:

> [@Latest Sarah Palin idiocy: Oh noes, I have neighbors! How awful!!](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/latest-sarah-palin-idiocy-oh-noes-i-have-neighbors-how-awful/540810/89):
>
> It’s not like this is the first time she’s ever made [such spurious accusations](http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/06/12/2009-06-12_alaska_gov_sarah_palin_wont_over_david_letterman.html).
> 
> She’s the very definition of a loopy cunt. (I can call non-users cunts, no? If I’m out of line, please let me know, mods.)

The answer in The Pit is yes.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/on-profanity-against-non-posters-edited-thread-title/540739)._