# Onlookers for DJT's EO signings, relevant, random or PR?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/onlookers-for-djts-eo-signings-relevant-random-or-pr/778977>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 4, 2017, 8:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/onlookers-for-djts-eo-signings-relevant-random-or-pr/778977 "2017-02-04T08:46:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![naita](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/naita/32/5862_2.png) [@naita](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/naita)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2017, 8:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/onlookers-for-djts-eo-signings-relevant-random-or-pr/778977/1 "2017-02-04T08:46:30Z")

</div>

So after Donald Trump’s signing of the Global Gag Rule some memetic hay was made about the fact that his … scenery were all male. I just noticed in this picture from signing … whatever he was signing that pertains to Dodd-Frank, there are several women.

> <https://twitter.com/scarylawyerguy/status/827656074455048193>

My immediate knee jerk reaction was of course, human that I am, that someone is ensuring these pictures are less all white male, but quickly realized it is entirely possible whomever is in the background is there for a good reason, or at least a reason.

So does anyone have sufficient Who’s who-knowledge and free time to analyze who’s being drafted, or volunteers, to be stage props for Trump’s EO signings?