Only one X chromosome active in a woman? But, but ...

Nothing to say, except that this thread is very interesting. I love this board. I would even pay to be here if it went on to be a subscription basis MB. :slight_smile:

Another common variation is Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. A female may be born with the XY combination. Because of her inability to respond to androgens, she will not develop as male, but will usually look completely female. Except for the lack of menses and the ability to bear children, many women with this condition wouldn’t be aware of it.

Not necessarily. The fate of individual cells is not determined to that level yet. Probably severel dozen cells at least will go on to become ectoderm, from which the skin and nervous system (including retinal cells) arise.

How would this apply to lesbians? For that matter, why not just make the kid smarter? Number of children is inversely correllated with academic achievement as well.

There are a couple of factors here. With many genes, even if only half your cells have active functional genes, you’ll make enough functional protein to get along just fine. Additionally, the “inactive” X chromosomes aren’t really completely inactive. There are some genes that are active, even if the rest of the chromosome is condensed and inactive. If this weren’t the case, a Turner syndrome woman (XO) would be completely normal, since their cells would all have one active X chromosome, like normal people, and they’re not.

Even with X-linked conditions, if a woman inherits the dodgy gene, and by some fluke it is expressed in the majority of her cells, she will inherit the disease to some extent…usually less severely than a male.

I’ve met one female haemophiliac, the daughter of an affected man and a non-carrier woman, who has mild haemophilia by that mechanism. She is quite different to another haemophiliac patient who is the daughter of an affected man and a carrier woman (who met each other through a support group), this girl is also a haemophilic, but is much more severly affected, since ALL of her cells have the dodgy gene.

Mosaicism can work with other chromasomes too, I met a child with mild learning disabilities who was found to have Down’s syndrome, but a mosaic form, so that only some of his cells contained the trisomy 21.

Very true, though that happens through different processes. Instead of one chromosome randomly inactivating, you’d need some sort of nondisjunction event early in development.

Is that correct?

I’m no expert, but what I seem to remember from biology lessons is somewhat different.

During Meiosis, that is the formation of sperm and egg cells, each pair of chromosomes exchange genes. So any chromosome you pass to your child, half the genes on that chromosome come from your father, and half from your mother.

Am I right?

It’s not that even or predictable a swap. Crossing over is somewhat random, so that the specific bits and pieces of chromosome exchanged will vary in each instance. But it is true that, although you have one copy of each gene from your father and one from your mother, the chromosomes themselves are not passed on in integral form. Also because of this, probably none of your siblings’ chromosomes are identical to your own.