[QUOTE=scr4]
$600,000 doesn’t do much these days. It would only fund the Iraq occupation for 3 minutes, for example.
[/QUOTE]
And then we could leave? Sweet!
Wouldn’t it be cheaper just to take some black paint and paint in huge letters on the roof, “R U Offended? Call 1-800-GETALFE”
Can’t we just keep it the way it is. That way, we’d have a place to keep these critters .
Wait, this is the SeaBees’ barracks. Aren’t they the ones who built airfields in the middle of the Pacific using mud and baling wire? We should just give them a $50,000 gift certificate to Home Depot, some spackle and a couple cases of beer. That thing would look like the Taj Mahal by the end of the week.
According to the news story I read, they realized the shape when the structure was built, but didn’t worry about it because nobody would be looking at it from above. Wait 40 years, add satellite imagery, and we have a problem.
Seems to me the solution is to build covered walkways between the buildings. Paint these the same shade as the roofs and you’re good.
Surely it can’t cost $600,000 just to build a new roof in the shape of Janet Jackson’s breast, can it?
[QUOTE=garygnu]
They should raise money from people offended by it.
[/QUOTE]
Nicely put.
[QUOTE=lieu]
I know just the guy to conduct it.
[/QUOTE]
I don’t get it. What is that supposed to be? Pieces of felt glued to his face?
[QUOTE=silenus]
According to the news story I read, they realized the shape when the structure was built, but didn’t worry about it because nobody would be looking at it from above. Wait 40 years, add satellite imagery, and we have a problem.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, that’s what I read too. After all, how often do you enter a building thinking, “How does this structure look from the sky?”
[QUOTE=guizot]
Yes, that’s what I read too. After all, how often do you enter a building thinking, “How does this structure look from the sky?”
[/QUOTE]
When I look at the floorplan in the lobby to figure out where room 5237 is.
[QUOTE=Antinor01]
Absolutely. We should go back to living in **black and white ** like it was before color TV. 
[/QUOTE]
To make sure you don’t offend anyone, this should read “African American and white”.
[QUOTE=tdn]
IModels are short. Wouldn’t most people look down on them?
[/QUOTE]
No, models are generally taller than the average woman, although plenty of people look down on them. Certainly Naomi’s conduct hasn’t helped the perception.
Don’t mind me, this was a pass-by posting.
[QUOTE=Hakuna Matata]
As an Architect my take on it is that likely each phase was done at a different time and thus no one noticed that the overall image was a swastika. Today this would be much less likely as the whole thing would be on a computer based drafting program and all the surrounding area would be included.
These drawings all would have been hand drawn at the time and there would not be very many reasons to include phase 1, 2, 3 and 4 in a drawing that was used to construct Phase 5 for example. At most you would include the adjacent portion of a building if it touch and intersected your current building.
Doesn’t preclude that there was a master plan done for the whole thing—that is a very likely scenario. But given that these are government buildings it is just as likely they built and designed each piece individually as needed. Master planning wasn’t done on every government building.
[/QUOTE]
This sort of thing happens. We have a store that got moved when Wal-Mart expanded into our space. The new location is great, except that the loading dock is 6 feet back from the road, 8 feet in the air, and faces a busy street.
[QUOTE=scr4]
$600,000 doesn’t do much these days. It would only fund the Iraq occupation for 3 minutes, for example.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but it could fund a pretty good USO show with a decently popular act for a deployed command.
Except the Guest OP in the linked thread, I don’t actually see any expressions of outrage. ETA: I didn’t watch the CNN link so I can’t speak for it.
[QUOTE=NinjaChick]
(shuffles Conspiracy Of The Week cards, draws one)
[/QUOTE]
I would buy a deck of those in a heartbeat.
This is insane. You have to really be desperate to find something offensive to you if you have to resort to satellite photos.
[QUOTE=Mangetout]
Surely it can’t cost $600,000 just to build a new roof in the shape of Janet Jackson’s breast, can it?
[/QUOTE]
The Navy already did that for the Google Maps]building across the street.
You should see what’s under there. :eek:
[QUOTE=Arnold Winkelried]
The Navy has budgeted up to US$ 600,000 for the next fiscal year
[/QUOTE]
I’d get behind this only if they used captured gold the navy liberated from sunken Nazi submarines.
Sailboat
My question is this: How often does Google Earth update its satellite photos? Even if the $600,000 can change the building’s appearance, the photo on Google Earth might hang around for a while.
What they’re not telling everybody is that they’re actually spending the $600K to bribe Google into photoshopping the pictures so the building no longer looks like a swastika.