# Opinions on Ayn Rand

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [April 2, 2017, 3:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588 "2017-04-02T15:14:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beren\_Erchamion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/90ced4/32.png) [@Beren\_Erchamion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beren_Erchamion)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 3:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/141 "2017-04-06T03:24:26Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> Hold on to her respect for reason and reality.

lol

so much respect that she created a “philosophy” that is utterly irrational and completely divorced from reality

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beren\_Erchamion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/90ced4/32.png) [@Beren\_Erchamion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beren_Erchamion)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 3:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/142 "2017-04-06T03:25:35Z")

</div>

> [@HoneyBadgerDC](#):
>
> I got a similar impression but at the same time I was impressed with how impartial she could be when breaking down her logic on very subjective issues.

lolno

She was anything but.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beren\_Erchamion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/90ced4/32.png) [@Beren\_Erchamion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beren_Erchamion)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 3:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/143 "2017-04-06T03:35:39Z")

</div>

> [@Shagnasty](#):
>
> You make some good points but again, her family had to leave Mother Russia because of the brutalities of the Russian Revolution. She found some reprieve in the U.S. and used her freedom to write against totalitarianism and the virtues of self-guidance. I don’t think you can find fault with someone that hates communism or socialism because they experienced the horror of something like that personally.

But she didn’t. What she experienced wasn’t in any way communist or socialist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 3:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/144 "2017-04-06T03:44:48Z")

</div>

Lots of people say racism is evil, while still actually doing racist things. The concept is easy to agree on as evil. The problem is the particulars.

I’d comment for the rest, but all I know about Rand is from what other people say about her work. But, to continue discussion, I’ll ask this:

What do you think of the narrative that, while Rand was wrong, her (modern) followers have made what she said worse? Or that she provided excuses for people who were already awful?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 4:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/145 "2017-04-06T04:09:39Z")

</div>

> [@Beren\_Erchamion](#):
>
> A moron.
> 
> There’s a reason serious philosophers laugh at her: her “ideas” are 100% substance- and thought-free. They’re internally contradictory and externally divorced from reality.

> [@Beren\_Erchamion](#):
>
> lol
> 
> so much respect that she created a “philosophy” that is utterly irrational and completely divorced from reality

> [@Beren\_Erchamion](#):
>
> lolno
> 
> She was anything but.

> [@Beren\_Erchamion](#):
>
> But she didn’t. What she experienced wasn’t in any way communist or socialist.

Four posts that bring absolutely zero to the discussion. Talk about substance-free!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 4:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/146 "2017-04-06T04:12:55Z")

</div>

> [@HoneyBadgerDC](#):
>
> Another example of what I don’t buy into. I think she puts out a lot of garbage and a lot of good stuff. Sometimes we reject the whole product when only parts of it are bad.

Well, that’s the thing. Her work can largely be described as original and insightful. Unfortunately, the parts that are original are not insightful, and the parts that are insightful are not original.\*

What this boils down to is that, since the useful things you find in her writings are likely to be found elsewhere, you’re not depriving yourself of anything of value by turning your back on her.

Same principle that I use when deciding whether to put someone on my “Ignore” list.

\*not an original witticism of mine, btw. It is attributed to Samuel Johnson.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fredescu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/73ab20/32.png) [@Fredescu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fredescu)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 4:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/147 "2017-04-06T04:22:27Z")

</div>

> [@HoneyBadgerDC](#):
>
> My primary premise that I don’t know how Ayn Rand feels about is that when individuals do discover a source for increasing their own value they will fiercely defend it, primarily by stepping up to the plate and working harder, becoming better at it.

She didn’t have anything useful to say about motivation. If pressed I think she would outright deny that a rational person can have motivation to work harder than they already are, as long as they are focused and thinking. To her, the primary choice is whether to think or not. If you think, you will work to support your life. Asking what motivates this choice is considered an invalid question, as that is the primary choice. If someone feels unmotivated they are probably being irrational. If someone feels more motivated, they are probably just being more rational. Pretty much useless gibberish that doesn’t make any attempt to explain the world as it is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 1:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/148 "2017-04-06T13:43:21Z")

</div>

> [@HoneyBadgerDC](#):
>
> I really did think she was sexy!

[Hubba hubba!](http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/marvel_dc/images/e/ee/Vera_Webster.png/revision/latest?cb=20110426142531)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 5:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/149 "2017-04-06T17:36:42Z")

</div>

Since I took Atlas Shrugged as a science fiction novel about the death of a society like ours via the means of a philosophical collapse, I enjoyed it thoroughly. Kind of like Harry Turtledove’s “What if alien lizards invaded at the height of WW2” series of books. Both books have bad writing, stock characters, and wildly implausible scenarios (don’t forget, much of the plot in AS is the search for a perpetual motion machine invented by John Galt), but they are written with such an earnestness that I’m always drawn into them.

Fountainhead, though… that was a bunch of crap. Stick with the sci-fi, Ayn! 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 6:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/150 "2017-04-06T18:50:02Z")

</div>

Disclaimer: I have never read one word of any of her books. I cannot imagine my life being so empty that I would want to devote five minutes to reading any of her books. All I know about Ayn Rand is that her fans are generally libertarians and I consider libertarianism to be not only intellectually bankrupt but morally bankrupt as well. So if you’re a college freshman and have read her books and want to yammer on all night with your roommate about her, bully for you. In time, you’ll grow up and abandon her silly ideas.

Now if she had talent as an author in the Stephen King sense where you want to follow the stories, I’d give her a shot. But from everything I’ve ever heard about her work, it really doesn’t sound like it would be worth my while to open one up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/151 "2017-04-06T19:50:35Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> Disclaimer: I have never read one word of any of her books. I cannot imagine my life being so empty that I would want to devote five minutes to reading any of her books. All I know about Ayn Rand is that her fans are generally libertarians and I consider libertarianism to be not only intellectually bankrupt but morally bankrupt as well. So if you’re a college freshman and have read her books and want to yammer on all night with your roommate about her, bully for you. In time, you’ll grow up and abandon her silly ideas.
> 
> Now if she had talent as an author in the Stephen King sense where you want to follow the stories, I’d give her a shot. But from everything I’ve ever heard about her work, it really doesn’t sound like it would be worth my while to open one up.

One of the things Rand railed against, especially in The Fountainhead, is when people have opinions only based on what other people already think. If you don’t want to read her stuff, fine. But then you should probably reserve your opinions about her work to yourself, to avoid embarrassment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 8:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/152 "2017-04-06T20:09:03Z")

</div>

It is odd to hear an argument based on “I have no experience with it, but since I don’t like \<quality X\> about the people I know who like it, I think it’s the worst thing evah”, isn’t it?

Oh, wait… no it’s not. :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/153 "2017-04-06T20:19:23Z")

</div>

I’ve never read Mein Kampf either but have enough of an opinion on the fans of the author to make me not read it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/154 "2017-04-06T20:21:16Z")

</div>

No, you have an opinion on the author based upon his other work. Had he merely written the one book and then disappeared from history, you likely would have no opinion at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beren\_Erchamion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/90ced4/32.png) [@Beren\_Erchamion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beren_Erchamion)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/155 "2017-04-06T22:05:39Z")

</div>

> [@Roderick\_Femm](#):
>
> One of the things Rand railed against, especially in The Fountainhead, is when people have opinions only based on what other people already think.

Which is a great example of how irrational and divorced from reality she was.

Because in the real world, we have a limited amount of time, not nearly enough to fully investigate everything we have to make decisions about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/156 "2017-04-06T22:17:54Z")

</div>

> [@Beren\_Erchamion](#):
>
> Which is a great example of how irrational and divorced from reality she was.
> 
> Because in the real world, we have a limited amount of time, not nearly enough to fully investigate everything we have to make decisions about.

Then you’re totally ignorant of her epistemological writings, in which she discussed this subject extensively.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beren\_Erchamion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/90ced4/32.png) [@Beren\_Erchamion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beren_Erchamion)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 10:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/157 "2017-04-06T22:25:55Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> Then you’re totally ignorant of her epistemological writings, in which she discussed this subject extensively.

I’m not ignorant of them; I understand them well enough to know that they’re not worth giving serious consideration to because they’re utter nonsense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 11:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/158 "2017-04-06T23:09:32Z")

</div>

> [@Beren\_Erchamion](#):
>
> I’m not ignorant of them; I understand them well enough to know that they’re not worth giving serious consideration to because they’re utter nonsense.

You have made your contempt clear in several posts without backing any of it up with anything. I’m not clear why you think anyone should pay attention to your unsupported opinion.

As for your response to my post, you clearly don’t understand the difference between “I have decided, due to reviews, not to spend my time reading this” and “I have decided, due to reviews, not to spend my time reading this awful trash.” In the first case you are only making a decision about the judicious use of your time. In the second, you are deciding the objective value of something based only on other people’s opinions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/159 "2017-04-06T23:29:54Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> Disclaimer: I have never read one word of any of her books. . . . But from everything I’ve ever heard about her work, it really doesn’t sound like it would be worth my while to open one up.

I’m in the minority here; I enjoyed her novels.

If you want to give her a fair chance, pick up a library copy of “Apollo and Dionysus” and read the title essay. It’s pretty damning, I’m afraid. She takes a fairly straightforward premise – reason is better than emotion – and makes it into a nasty, vitriolic diatribe, bad-mouthing hippies (!) and otherwise making a horse’s ass of herself.

Still, you ought to read something of hers, just to know whereof you speak.

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> I’ve never read Mein Kampf either but have enough of an opinion on the fans of the author to make me not read it.

I’ve read that, too – okay, after a little while I just started skimming. Rand is by far the better writer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beren\_Erchamion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/90ced4/32.png) [@Beren\_Erchamion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beren_Erchamion)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2017, 11:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588/160 "2017-04-06T23:39:39Z")

</div>

> [@Roderick\_Femm](#):
>
> objective value

No such thing. “Objective value” is a meaningless, self-contradictory term.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588.md?page=7)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opinions-on-ayn-rand/783588.md?page=9)
