# "Opus" comic strip suppressed

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [August 25, 2007, 6:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907 "2007-08-25T18:08:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 2:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/81 "2007-08-29T14:19:37Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=lalenin]  
Now substitute…  
[/QUOTE]  
So what? Editorial cartoons are _often_ offensive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lalenin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/3da27b/32.png) [@lalenin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lalenin)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 2:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/82 "2007-08-29T14:24:28Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Squink]  
So what? Editorial cartoons are _often_ offensive.  
[/QUOTE]

I can’t disagree with you, however it seems that being offensive to muslims is against the policy of the Washington Post, any other group is fair game. Agreed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/83 "2007-08-29T14:25:49Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=tomndebb]  
Nose rubbed in what? Your inability to read for comprehension?  
[/quote]  
No, your stubborn refusal to read.

> [@](#):
>
> Sources told [FOXNews.com](http://FOXNews.com) that the strips were shown to Muslim staffers at The Washington Post to gauge their reaction, and they esponded “emotionally” to the depiction of a woman dressed in traditional Muslim garb and espousing conservative Islamic views.
> 
> There was also considerable alarm over the strip at the highest echelons of The Washington Post Co., according to the sources.

**Shodan** ’s rule of thumb - if they didn’t read it the first time, they won’t read it the second either.

> [@](#):
>
> However, the Washington Post Writers Group is an independent organization within the larger Washington Post Company and, other than the warning, it did nothing to suppress the comics, continuing to distribute them to any paper that would accept them.

No, the suppression of the comic came from the Washington Post itself, as mentioned.

> [@](#):
>
> I am quite willing to draw some inferences about you, based on your snide insistence that you have answered a question I posted when you have not.

I see you are back on the “make it personal” track instead of the “don’t make it personal” track.

> [@](#):
>
> has The Washington Post, (_that would be the actual newspaper, not a separate division of the company–a division that did not, itself, suppress the cartoons_), issued a statement regarding its decision to drop the strips?

As mentioned, they are not likely to admit their cowardice and hypocrisy. They seem to be as much in denial as you.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sqweels](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f19dbf/32.png) [@sqweels](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sqweels)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 3:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/84 "2007-08-29T15:56:33Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=lalenin]  
You are right, however being a Cuba-American is an ethnic identity, and it seems the Washington Post had no problem publishing a cartoon that is outright offensive and hostile to them.  
[/QUOTE]

Well, if your interpretation of that cartoon is correct, then that’s bad. But I’m skeptical that Oliphant is directly asserting that Cuban-Americans “interfere” with elections. He usually has pretty sophisticated satire. Are your sure he’s not satirizing something that Obama said?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 4:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/85 "2007-08-29T16:09:14Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=lalenin]  
it seems that being offensive to muslims is against the policy of the Washington Post, any other group is fair game. Agreed?  
[/QUOTE]  
I think rather that these little angst-fests over ‘offensive’ cartoons crop up semi-randomly. Someone gets their jaw out of joint, and once in a while impacts publishing decisions. This sort of thing happens a couple of times each year, and never seems to signify much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 4:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/86 "2007-08-29T16:14:35Z")

</div>

But if they riot in Denmark, it seems to signify a bit more.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/87 "2007-08-29T16:53:46Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Shodan]  
No, your stubborn refusal to read.  
**Shodan** ’s rule of thumb - if they didn’t read it the first time, they won’t read it the second either.  
No, the suppression of the comic came from the Washington Post itself, as mentioned.  
I see you are back on the “make it personal” track instead of the “don’t make it personal” track.  
As mentioned, they are not likely to admit their cowardice and hypocrisy. They seem to be as much in denial as you.  
[/QUOTE]  
The question I specifically asked was whether _The Washington Post_ had actually issued a statement on the issue. My original question was simply whether anyone had discovered a statement from the WaPo editors that I had missed. With all the ensuing hoopla, I was surprised that no statement had been issued, and my experience of old _Doonesbury_ strips had been that various papers generally stuck a tag on the strip mentioning that they were withholding the strip for that date because they found the material objectionable. I was doing nothing more than looking for whatever statement the WaPo might have issued in conjunction with refusing to run these strips.  
You have provided a statement from Fox News claiming unnmamed “sources” made several comments.  
Even if the sources are correct, this fails to answer my specific question as to whether the newspaper had addressed the issue.  
Repeating your erroneous claim that your citation provided a statement from WaPo management is simply silly.

I do not think that the decision was legitimate and it is obvious that the decision to not run the strip in _The Washington Post_ was made by the editors of _The Washington Post_. However, “unnamed ‘sources’” paraphrased in a competing news organization is not the same thing as a statement by the organization, itself, which was all that I sought.

You are the one who has tried to make this personal with your silly claims of rubbing noses and absurd claims of “denial.”  
**Shodan** ’s Rule of Thumb obviously describes **Shodan** ’s posting.  
**Shodan** ’s Rule of Action: Claim the same nonsense over and over, ignoring the actual statements of other posters until they get tired of the personal attacks and leave the falsehood standing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/88 "2007-08-29T17:01:38Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=lalenin]  
I don’t understand the standards of the Washington Post. The also ran [this cartoon](http://wpcomics.washingtonpost.com/client/wpc/po/2007/08/22/) which left a really bad taste in my mouth. I can sort of, kind of, rationalize it by thinking that perhaps the cartoonist is trying to lampoon the sentiments expressed in the cartoon. But I get the feeling that’s not the case.

In case you can’t see the link, a figure of Uncle Sam is pushing a small boat full of men labelled “Cuban-Americans”, in the direction of Cuba. Uncle Sam is saying “Mr. Obama has made the excellent suggestion that you nuisances be allowed to freely visit Cuba…which I think is a Dam’ fine idea. Bon Voyage!” The men in the boat are saying “Outrageous! We demand a chance to interfere with the '08 election!”. In the water a small worm(?) is saying “Say hello to Batista!”

There are so many thing offensive in that cartoon I simply can not imagine what it is trying to say. Is it implying that by voting in the 08 election Cuban-Americans would interfere with it? Is it saying that the USA would be well rid of Cuban-Americans? Is it implying that all Cuban-Americans are Batista supporters? Like with most instances of prejudice I am at a loss to explain it.

By the way, the cartoonist name is Pat Oliphant, for what it is worth.  
[/QUOTE]  
The fact that the artist is Oliphant makes it clear that it was a political cartoon–a medium that has even more free rein for insult and offense than stuff that runs in the regular comics.  
The folks in the rowboat, while labelled “Cuban-Americans” are all depicted as being very old wearing 1950s style hats and shawls. (Oliphant’s trademark little critter making the Batista comment is probably intended to reinforce the notion that Oliphant is expressly addressing the first generation of émigrés, not necessarily anyone living in Florida who happens to have immigrated from Cuba or been born to Cuban immigrants.)  
The reference to “interfering” is more likely an implication that all the cigar and rum money the first group of “rich” refugees brought out of Cuba has (in the minds of many) been used to buy patronage and political power–not a simple claim that they should not be allowed to vote. (I had not heard **NDP** ’s story of recount interference, but that would not apply to the first generation, anyway, as it is a bit difficult to picture a bunch of octogenarians ransacking a polling office.)

Now, I am not in any way pretending that it is not insulting. However, the fact that it is a political cartoon that provides most readers familiar with Oliphant\* a context for a specific target places it in a different category of editorial oversight than a strip placed in the “funny papers.” (I have not seen a print edition of the WaPo in years. In any other paper, Oliphant’s stuff would appear on the editorial page and not with the comics. I presume that that would also be the case in the WaPo, but I am open to correction.)

- (_Who reads Oliphant besides us geezers, anyway?_)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/89 "2007-08-29T17:16:00Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=tomndebb]  
Oliphant’s trademark little critter  
[/QUOTE]  
Does that thing have a name, or even a _species_?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/90 "2007-08-29T17:22:23Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Squink]  
Does that thing have a name, or even a _species_?  
[/QUOTE]  
I have several collections of Oliphant dating back to the 1950s and I cannot recall him (or anyone else) giving it any identification.

OTOH, Wikipedia claims it is a “[small penguin character named Punk](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Oliphant).”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 5:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/91 "2007-08-29T17:25:37Z")

</div>

By the way, the Post’s cartoonist is Tom Toles, not Oliphant. That cartoon didn’t run in their daily paper.

And I don’t understand why it’s only the right that’s annoyed by this. Kow-towing to any group of easily offended idiots sets a bad precedent, whatever the reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lalenin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/3da27b/32.png) [@lalenin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lalenin)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/92 "2007-08-29T17:31:52Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Larry Borgia]  
By the way, the Post’s cartoonist is Tom Toles, not Oliphant. That cartoon didn’t run in their daily paper.

And I don’t understand why it’s only the right that’s annoyed by this. Kow-towing to any group of easily offended idiots sets a bad precedent, whatever the reason.  
[/QUOTE]

I don’t think I qualify as right or left, I have never voted in any election in the US or Canada, and I don’t count Cuban elections. I am however Cuban, and if I ever meet Mr. Oliphant I will call him a racist idiot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/93 "2007-08-29T17:34:47Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=lalenin]  
I don’t think I qualify as right or left, I have never voted in any election in the US or Canada, and I don’t count Cuban elections. I am however Cuban, and if I ever meet Mr. Oliphant I will call him a racist idiot.  
[/QUOTE]

I was referring to the Opus cartoon, not the Oliphant cartoon. Sorry for not making that clear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GLWasteful](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/f05b48/32.png) [@GLWasteful](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GLWasteful)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2007, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907/94 "2007-08-29T18:44:47Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Larry Borgia]  
And I don’t understand why it’s only the right that’s annoyed by this. Kow-towing to any group of easily offended idiots sets a bad precedent, whatever the reason.  
[/QUOTE]

It doesn’t appear that it’s only the right who thinks this is a dumb idea. I’m not sure where you’re getting that impression.

And does anyone recall the row between Oliphant and Breathed when the latter won the Pulitzer? That they’re both being discussed is, I think, interesting to say the least.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/opus-comic-strip-suppressed/416907.md?page=4)
