I didn’t know Bricker was a rab… no, can’t do it.
So in other words, Bricker, we are better off papering this over with euphemisms to give the mohels’ motivations the benefit of the doubt?
Why? I don’t think anyone gives a good G-ddamn what their motivations are. This is a graphic act that merits graphic description. Sanitizing this ghastly practice isn’t morally neutral; it banalizes something really foul. You may think you owe the mohels the benefit of the doubt. I don’t.
I’m okay with outlawing licking baby dicks. I’m gonna take a stand on that.
Bricker, keep fucking that chicken, KFTC.
Ok.
You all win. I withdraw my criticism. They are all sucking baby dicks. That’s the thing to say.
It’s not “the thing to say.” It’s what they are doing.
Yes, I agree now. I was wrong. The best, most fair way to describe this is: ultra-Orthodox Jews support sucking babies’ dicks.
I am totally on board.
You’re so full of shit. What a disingenuous douche.
What? How can I be wrong then and wrong now? I have totally repudiated my prior position.
I am.
There should be no act or thought that becomes legal (or illegal) only because you prefix it with the words “God says”.
So you do believe that this is an act of pedophilia?
Bricker, this thread will define you for me like these others:
(List to be read in Cartman’s voice)
Stoid = “I’m so fat, diets don’t work, I ate a box of donuts!”
Dio = “Did not, did not, did not, did not…”
Lindsaybluth = “I’m so rich, I have milk!”
Oakminster = “Screw you guys, I’m going home! Oh wait no I’m not”
Bricker = “Sucking baby dicks? Barack Hussein Obama…The Second!”
Do you believe a parent cares whether a pedophile or a non-pedophile killed their child?
Bricker posted:
“So sniggering about pedophilia is justified in response to a practice that’s stupid, even though it’s not related to pedophilia?”
Bricker, do you have some evidence that men don’t become mohels specifically because they like the idea of sucking baby dicks in the same way that people become catholic priests in order to have access to alter boys? Would you kindly share this evidence with the board?
So sniggering about pedophilia is justified in response to a practice that’s stupid, even though it’s not related to pedophilia?
That has nothing to do with my question or even with my stance on the issue.
Fucking word.
Do you believe that to be the case?
I don’t want to jump on the Bricker beatdown or bandwagon, but that is stupid reasoning. Do we have to prove now perversion doesn’t drive every career choice? Podiatrists all have foot fetishes. Physical therapists all have Acrotomophilia.
Need I prove otherwise?
You forgot to bat your innocent eyelashes above big brown eyes when you said this.
“who me”?
Likewise, if we admit to Bricker that we’re all anti-semites who are accusing mohels of being child molestors, you think he’ll STFU?
I’m not Jewish: but I do wonder… why is it the eighth day after birth? Why not the eighth month? Or the 8th year, and then the circumcision could be bandaged properly with sterile dressings, without being suffocated in a diaper, which do get dirty, and feces is an excellent substance to spread diseases.
It’s 2012 and there are plenty of bandage materials available that would do the job without the disease vector of a human mouth to a wound on a little boys penis.